Case law

Jorgensen v. Department of Transportation

969 A.2d 912 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 28, 2009

See Rodriguez v. … Id. ¶ ¶ 19-20, 948 A.2d at 1230-31 ; see also Darling v.

Delogu v. City of Portland

843 A.2d 33 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 2004

Delogu v. State, 1998 ME 246, ¶ 18 , 720 A.2d 1153, 1156 (quoting McBreairty v. Comm’r of Admin, and Fin. … Milk Producers, Inc. v. Comm’r of Agric., 483 A.2d 1213 , 1220 n. 11 (Me.1984) (quoting Boston Milk Producers, Inc. v. Halperin, 446 A.2d 33, 40 (Me.1982)).

Gosselin

141 Me. 412 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1945

O’Malia v. Wentworth, 65 Me., 129; Hibbard v. Bridges, 76 Me., 324; 25 Am. Jur. 144 , Par. 2; 39 C. J. S., 425, Par. 1. … A., 764; State v. Arris, 121 Me., 94, 115 A., 648 , 24 A. L. R., 990; State v. Vashon, 123 Me., 412, 123 A., 511 .

Homeward Residential, Inc. v. Marianne A. Gregor

165 A.3d 357 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 22, 2017

Brown v. Town of Starks, 2015 ME 47, ¶ 6, 114 A.3d 1003. Otherwise, the issue is deemed waived. Id.; see Foster v. … See Runnells v.

Bank of America, N.A. v. James A. Cloutier

61 A.3d 1242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 2013

P. 24(a), we conduct an independent examination to decide if answering the question is consistent with our basic function as an appellate court, or would improperly place us in the role of an advisory board. Baker v. … Similarly, in HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v.

Corey v. Independent Ice Co.

106 Me. 485 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1910

Cleaves v. Lord, 43 Maine, 290; North Bank v. Brown, 50 Maine, 214; Sweet v. Brackley, 53 Maine, 346; Whiting v. Burger, 78 Maine, 287; Const. U. S. Art. 4, sec. 1, an act of Congress of May 26, 1790. … See also Stout v. Lye, 103 U. S. 66 ; Werlein v. New Orleans, 177 U. S. 390 ; Harlow v. Bartlett, 170 Mass. 584 . Corbett v.

Hatch v. Portland Terminal Co.

125 Me. 96 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1925

Reed v. Director General, supra. And Hatch’s duties although he had no occasion to board any train, were with and related to that train. His work was so closely connected therewith as to be part of it. Pederson v. … Co v. Groeger, 266 U. S. 521 , 69 L. ed., 419; decided January 5, 1925; Bragg v. Hatfield, 124 Maine, 391; Jannell v. Myers, 124 Maine, 229, Daughraty v. Tebbetts, 122 Maine, 397; Mears v. Biddle, 122 Maine, 392.

Bowen v. Peters

71 Me. 463 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 7, 1880

The articles were necessary to make the schooner seaworthy; they were delivered on board and became a part of the vessel and outfit. … Elder v. Larrabee, 45 Maine, 590. But in Hardy v.

Hayford v. Cunningham

72 Me. 128 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1881

An. 30; Jackson v. Propeller Kinnie, 8 Am. Law. Peg. (N. S.) 470; Murphy v. Mobile Co. 49 Ala. 436 ; Crawford v. Bark Caroline Reed, 42 Cal. 471 ; Cavender v. Fanny Barker, 40 Mo. 235 ; Wyatt v. … Y. 52 ; Brookman v. Hamrill, Id. 554; Happy v. Mosher, 48 Id: 313; King v. Greenway, 71 N. Y. 417 ; Wilson v. Lawrence, 82 N. Y. 409 .

Markley v. Semle

713 A.2d 945 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1998

Mariello v. Giguere, 667 A.2d 588, 591 (Me.1995). Generally, we review the trial court’s implicit *947 factual findings for clear error. See Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Sylvester, 650 A.2d 702, 704 (Me.1994). … Cutts v.

Coker v. City of Lewiston

710 A.2d 909 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 1998

The City, relying on Rad-vanovsky v. Maine Dept. of Manpower Affairs, 427 A.2d 961 (Me.1981) and Closson v. … See Beaulieu v. City of Lewiston, 440 A.2d 334, 344 (Me.1982). 3 We look first to the plain meaning of the statutory language as a means of effecting the legislative intent. See Daniels v.

State v. Clarke

738 A.2d 1233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 13, 1999

State v. Lewis, 1998 ME 83, ¶ 7 , 711 A.2d 119, 122 . In State v. … Ric-ci, a board-certified pediatrician and emergency physician and director of a child abuse program, gave his opinion that Deanna was a chronically and acutely abused child.

Sinclair v. Sinclair

654 A.2d 438 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 10, 1995

SINCLAIR et al. v. Rita M. SINCLAIR. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued June 24, 1994. Decided February 10, 1995. Lara M. Nomani (orally), Perkins, Townsend, Shay & Brown, P.A., Skowhegan, for plaintiffs. Brett D. … See Hubert v.

Inhabitants of Ripley v. Inhabitants of Hebron

60 Me. 379 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1872

The case of Parkman v. … Hampden v.

State v. Phillips

107 Me. 249 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 2, 1910

Bristol v. … So in Eudora v.

State v. Adams

457 A.2d 416 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1983

See Talbot v. Board of Education, 171 Misc. 974 , 14 N.Y.S.2d 340, 347 (1939). As stated in Hann v. … State v.

Hammond v. Woodman

41 Me. 177 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

Johnson v. Jordan, 2 Met. 234 ; Blake v. Clarke, 6 Greenl. 439; New Ipswich Factory v. Batchelder, 3 N. H. 190; Nichols v. Luce, 24 Pick. 102 . … Prescott v. White, 21 Pick. 341 ; Prescott v. Williams, Adm’r, 5 Met. 429 , and cases cited; Pomfret v. Recroft, 1 Ware’s Saunders, 323, note 6.

Poulin v. Bilodeau

161 Me. 306 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 8, 1965

Bragdon v. Shapiro, 146 Me. 83, 84 . … Walker v. Norton, 131 Me. 69, 70 . The mandate shall be: Appeal denied.

Smith v. Lovell

146 Me. 63 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 26, 1950

Another leading case, and one exactly in point in the instant case is Brown v. Commonwealth, 4 Rawle (Pa.) 259. This case was decided and reported several years prior to Kite v. Commonwealth and has been often cited. … Rep. 1 ; Gregory v. Queen, 15 Q. B. 974 and also Blitz v. United States, supra. An analysis of these cases, however, shows that they are not in point. In Blitz v.

State v. Williams

395 A.2d 1158 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 1978

See State v. Hurd, Me., 360 A.2d 525, 527 (1976). V. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 164 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). It also protects against conviction for two offenses, one of which is necessarily included in the other. Newell v.