Case law

Randall v. F. W. Abbott Co.

111 Me. 7 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 1913

Jensen v. Kyer, 101 Maine, 106. … Labatt Master and Servant, Secs. 450- 451; McKee v. Tourtelotte, 167 Mass., 69 .

Durstin v. Dodge

138 Me. 12 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 1941

The plaintiff relies on Fenlason v. Shedd et al., 109 Me., 326, 84 A., 409 ; Westbrook Manufacturing Company v. Grant, 60 Me., 88; and Windsor v. China, 4 Me., 298. Fenlason v. … In Second National Bank v.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Pelletier

31 A.3d 1235 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 9, 2011

As with the rescission remedy available in equity, see Getchell v. … Following the certification of the original opinion in this case, Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v.

Rush v. Buckley

70 L.R.A. 464 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 19, 1905

In Brown v. … In Bell v.

Baker v. Johnson

41 Me. 15 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

But in the case of Com. v. … A mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel the county treasurer to pay, when he refuses to pay a demand which the board of supervisors have legally audited and allowed, or directed to be paid. People v.

Alan Miller v. Steve N. Miller

167 A.3d 1252 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 2017

See Aiello v. Aiello, 852 N.E.2d 68, 79-80 (Mass. 2006); see also Wilson v. … Cf., e.g., FDIC v.

Viles v. S. D. Warren Co.

132 Me. 277 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 1934

In Barker v. … In Peterson v.

Erskine v. Commissioner of Corrections

682 A.2d 681 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 15, 1996

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Brennan , BAR-95-6 (Dec. 26, 1995) (Dana, J.). … In Farmer v.

State v. Gauthier

939 A.2d 77 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 2007

. [¶ 3] On December 8, 2005, the State Police received a call from a caretaker in Pownal indicating that he found a bleach bottle, beer cans, a baseball bat, and a bag of brown/red stained clothing on a property in Pownal … State v. Small, 2000 ME 182, ¶ 5 , 763 A.2d 104, 105 (citing State v.

State v. Hebert

455 A.2d 925 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 1, 1983

The prosecutrix’s mother testified that she had found very dark brown stains over the crotch of the prosecutrix’s underwear. … In State v.

Stavis Ipswich Clam Co. v. Green

236 A.2d 708 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 9, 1968

(emphasis added) Such submission is equivocal, see England et al. v. … See also State of California v. Copus (1958) 158 Tex. 196 , 309 S.W.2d 227 , [1-3] 229, cert. den. 356 U.S. 967 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 . So ordered.

Herrick v. State

159 Me. 499 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1963

*. * * * (I) ts *503 force and meaning must be determined with relation to the particular object sought, and is a relative and comparative term, depending upon its application to the object sought, * * Kay County Excise Board … v.

Wescott v. Mitchell

95 Me. 377 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 25, 1901

Wimer v. Overseers of the Poor of Worth Township, 104 Pa. St. 317; King v. Duluth M. & N. Ry. Co., 61 Minn. 482 ; Lewis v. McReavy, 7 Wash. 294 ; Vanderbilt v. Schreyer, 91 N. Y. 392 ; Jackson v. Cobbin, 8 M. & W. 790. … See note to Ferguson v. Harris, 39 Am. St. Rep., at p. 745.

Davis v. Bruk

411 A.2d 660 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1980

We said in State v. … See Brown v. Bradbury, 110 Colo. 537 , 135 P.2d 1013 (1943); Cozby v. Arm strong, 205 S.W.2d 403 (Tex.Civ.App.1947); Stewart v. Compton, 549 S.W.2d 832 (Ky. App.1977). But this Court, in Gore v.

Marble

136 Me. 52 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 13, 1938

These items constitute charges for the board and expenses of Helen O’Connell, minor daughter of the beneficiary for the period of six years, and aggregate $1934.69. … The Court in Roberts v.

Norway National Bank v. Oates

297 A.2d 898 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 1972

Thaxter v. Fry, Me., 222 A.2d 686 (1966); Bradbury v. Jackson, 97 Me. 449 , 54 A. 1068 (1903). … In re Estate of Brown, 86 Me. 572, 579 (1894). In Article Second of her second codicil Mrs.

Libby v. Clark

88 Me. 32 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 18, 1895

Thereupon the board of managers of the Bank, on the day before the above memorandum was signed, voted, " That the Treasurer be authorized to quitclaim the lot *35 of land forty feet by one hundred feet, with the two-story … Rowell v. Jewett, 69 Maine, 293; Stinchfield v. Milliken, 71 Maine, 567; Lewis v. Small, 71 Maine, 552; Reed v. Reed, 75 Maine, 264; Jameson v. Emerson, 82 Maine, 359.

Geary v. Stanley Medical Research Institute

939 A.2d 86 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 15, 2008

See, e.g., Perry v. St. … Mid-America Transplant Ass’n, 135 S.W.3d 527 (Mo.Ct.App.2004); Nicoletta v. Rochester Eye & Human Parts Bank, Inc., 136 Misc.2d 1065 , 519 N.Y.S.2d 928 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1987); Brown v. Del.

State v. Richard L. Hodges, Inc.

420 A.2d 247 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 1, 1980

Board of Review, 210 N.W.2d 828, 830 (Iowa 1973); Billings Transfer Corp. v. County of Davidson, supra, 276 N.C. at 33 , 170 S.E.2d at 884 ; Hemingway Transport, Inc. v. … See, e. g., Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky, 199 U.S. 194, 202-03 , 26 S.Ct. 36, 36-37 , 50 L.Ed. 150 (1905). . E. g., Northwest Airlines, Inc. v.

State v. Hawkins

261 A.2d 255 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 22, 1970

Chimel v. … Maine never used the rule of exclusion until required to do so by Mapp v. Ohio, supra. See for example, State v. Plunk-ett, 64 Me. 534 ; State v. Burroughs, 72 Me. 479 ; Brown v.