Case law

Rice v. Alley

791 A.2d 932 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 22, 2002

A player would review and compare the bonanza cards he or she purchased to pre-posted letters and numbers on the bingo board. … Cole v.

Hayford v. Wentworth

97 Me. 347 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 5, 1903

Co. v. Cyr, supra. Thus in Munroe v. … Dec. 64 , a cistern and sinks fastened to the floor by nails or set in the floor by cutting away boards; water pipes fastened by hooks driven into the plastering and walls and passing through holes cut by the tenant in the

Rogers v. Saunders

16 Me. 92 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1839

And in Lennon v. … Browne, opposing the application for renewal, argued, that the proviso was intended to be strictly and precisely executed.

Inhabitants of Lebanon v. Shapleigh

154 Me. 325 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1958

In Fenn v. … See also, Hand, Admr. v. Nickerson, 148 Me. 465 , 95 A. (2nd) 813. The defendants never have agreed in compliance with the statute, and as was said in Whittemore v.

Miller v. Ward

111 Me. 134 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 6, 1913

Rowell v. … Munro v. Barton, 95 Maine, 262.

Haynes v. Jackson

744 A.2d 1050 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2000

See Masters v. … See Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Lee, 422 A.2d 998, 1002 (Me.1980). 9 .

DiPietro v. Secretary of State

802 A.2d 399 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2002

Koren v. Sec’y of State, 574 A.2d 895, 897 (Me.1990); accord Mathieu v. … V.

French v. Pratt

27 Me. 381 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1847

Jones & ux. v. Brewer, 1 Pick. 314 ; Scott, petitioner, v. Hancock & al. 13 Mass. … In the case of Jones & ux. v.

Milton v. Cary Medical Center

538 A.2d 252 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 22, 1988

See Picard v. Libby, 152 Me. 257 , 127 A.2d 490 (1956); Dostie v. Lewiston Crushed Stone Co., 136 Me. 284 , 8 A.2d 393 (1939); Carrier v. Bornstein, 136 Me. 1 , 1 A.2d 219 (1938); Curran v. … Corniea, 229 Minn. 365 , 38 N.W.2d 838 (1949); Rainey v. Horn, 221 Miss. 269 , 72 So.2d 434 (1954); O’Grady v. Brown, 654 S.W.2d 904 (Mo.1983); White v. Yup, 85 Nev. 527 , 458 P.2d 617 (1969); Poliquin v.

Shalit v. Shalit

126 Me. 291 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 29, 1927

hospital and twice afterwards; that there was nothing unusual, no complications in the case; that she was able to nurse the child and that “the patient had taken the baby off the breast against my advice and put it out to board … Stackpole v. Perkins, 85 Maine 298 ; Parsons v. Railway, 96 Maine 508 ; Drew v. Shannon, supra; White v. Andrews, supra; Bridgham v. Hinds, supra; Rodman Co. v. Kostis, 121 Maine 90 .

Patten v. Fullerton

27 Me. 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1847

Lord Chancellor Cowper, in the case of Whitlock v. … Henry Tallman testified “ that a portion of what he received from Fullerton was paid in lumber, boards, and timber, for his own use.”

Langley v. Home Indemnity Company

272 A.2d 740 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 21, 1971

Allison v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co., Fla.App., 222 So.2d 254 (1969); Ball v. California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau, 201 Cal.App.2d 85 , 20 Cal.Rptr. 31 (1962), Oatis v. … (emphasis supplied by plaintiffs) (Quoted by plaintiffs from In re Brown’s Estate, 168 Kan. 612 , 215 P.2d 203, 207 (1950).

Northup v. State

272 A.2d 747 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 20, 1971

Von Moltke v. … Moore v. State, 231 Ind. 690 , 111 N.E.2d 47 (1953); State v. Kruchten, 101 Ariz. 186 , 417 P.2d 510 (1966); Hand v. State, Mo., 447 S.W.2d 529 (1969); People v.

Maine Human Rights Commission v. City of South Portland

508 A.2d 948 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 25, 1986

Brown, Deputy Atty. Gen., Augusta, for Maine Human Rights Comm. Tureen & Margolin, Harold L. Lichten, (orally), Portland, for intervenors, Me. Ass'n of Handicapped Persons and Judy Roberts. William H. … In Percy v.

Veneer Products Co. v. Ross

127 Me. 442 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 8, 1929

Banton v. Shorey, 77 Me., 48; Buker v. Bowden, 83 Me., 67; Emerson v. Shores, 95 Me., 237 ; Brown v. Bishop, 105 Me., 272. But the contract right, created by the permit, is not revocable and is subject to breach. … Emerson v. Shores, supra.

Patricia Galouch v. Department of Professional and Financial Regulation

114 A.3d 988 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 2015

Fuhrmann v. … .”); Higgins v.

Ellsworth ME Solar, LLC v. Public Utilities Comission

2026 ME 10 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 2026

Found. v. Pub. Utils. … LLC v. Pub. Utils.

Bolton v. Bolton

73 Me. 299 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 7, 1882

Soc. v. Clendenien, 44 Md. 429 ; Arthur v. Odd Fel. Ben. Asso. 29 Ohio St. 557, 376 ; Ken. Mas. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 13 Bush. (Ken.) 489; Masons’ Benev. Soc. v. Winthrop, 85 Ill. 537 ; Same v. … Brown, 7 Maine, 420 ; Elder v. Elder, 10 Maine, 80,) it does admit, by necessity, sufficient extrinsic testimony to apply them to the subjects and objects to which by their terms they refer. Eveleth v.

Woodbury v. Gardner

77 Me. 68 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 1885

Stearns v. Hubbard, 8 Maine, 320 ; Wilton v. Harwood, 23 Maine, 131; Bubier v. Bubier, 24 Maine, 42; Farnham v. Clements, 51 Maine, 426. … So, in the absence of such relationship, where a husband and wife accepted the offer of an aged person in poor health, that if they would give himself and nurse lodging and board in a certain house and take care of him until

Agway, Inc. v. Ernst

394 A.2d 774 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 21, 1978

In 1969, Agway’s Board of Directors voted to discontinue its 2% discount policy. … Gulf Oil Corp. v. Lone Star Producing Co., 322 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1963), Savage v. Crag Lumber Co., 177 Cal.App.2d 770 , 2 Cal.Rptr. 498 (1960); Gilmore v. Texas Co., 100 Fla. 169 , 129 So. 587 (1930); Smart v.