Case law

Moreland v. Vomilas

127 Me. 493 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 31, 1929

Smith v. Putney, 18 Me., 87; Jewell v. Gage, 42 Me., 247. … Brown v. Hume, 16 Gratt (Va.), 456. The intent of the legislature in its use of the word “vacation” is what we are seeking.

Barnes v. Inhabitants of Rumford

96 Me. 315 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 20, 1902

Moore v. Abbot, 32 Maine, 46 ; Moulton v. Sanford, 51 Maine, 127; Aldrich v. Gorham, 77 Maine, 287. So in State v. Boston & Maine R. … Holmes v. Paris, 75 Maine, 559.

Carleton v. Patrons' Androscoggin Mutual Fire Insurance

109 Me. 79 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 25, 1912

May on Insurance, sec. 49, et seq; Wainer v. Milford Fire Ins. Co., 153 Mass., 339 ; Allen v. M. M. Acc. Assm., 167 Mass., 18 ; Hoyt v. M. B. Ins. Co., 98 Mass., 539 ; Markey v. M. B. Ins. Co., 103 Mass., 78 . … Lindley v. Union Ins. Co., 65 Maine, 368; Bigelow v. Ins. Co., 94 Maine, 39.

Kobeckis v. Budzko

225 A.2d 418 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 1967

Ingersoll Candy Co. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 674 , 59 P.2d 144 [3, 4], 148; Brown v. Nebiker (1941) 229 Iowa 1223 , 296 N.W. 366 [2], 371, and that properly prepared it will cause no harm. … Holt v.

Farmington Village Corp. v. Sandy River National Bank

85 Me. 46 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 13, 1892

Other authorities to the same effect are : Sheffield Waterworks v. Yeoman, L. R. 2 Ch. App. 8, 12; Brown v. Truesdale, 138 U. S. 389 ; Winsor v. Baily, 55 N. H. 218, 221; Pom. Eq. §§ 269, 1394. … Co. v. Reals, 79 N. Y. 202 ; Venice v. *54 Woodruff, 62 N. Y. 462 ; Noah v. Webb, 1 Edw. Ch. 604, 608 , 615 ; Shotwell v. Shotwell, 24 N. J. Eq. 378. In the case of Noah v.

State v. Fishing Vessel, Flying Yankee

589 A.2d 461 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1991

Robinson v. Board of Trustees of Maine State Retirement System, 523 A.2d 1376, 1379 (Me.1987). … State v. Eaton, 577 A.2d 1162 (Me.1990).

Antler's Inn & Restaurant, LLC v. Department of Public Safety

60 A.3d 1248 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 28, 2012

When the Town’s Board of Selectmen denied the requested license, the Inn appealed to the Bureau of Liquor Enforcement within the Department of Public Safety pursuant to 28-A M.R.S. §§ 82(5), 653(3) (2012). … Oronoka Rest, Inc. v. Me.

State v. DiPietro

964 A.2d 636 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 2009

Swanson v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, 1997 ME 63, ¶ 6 , 692 A.2d 441, 443 ; see also Luhr v. Bickford, 661 A.2d 1141, 1142 (Me.1995); State v. … See Maryland v.

State of Maine v. Richard Griffin

159 A.3d 1240 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 2017

State v. … See State v. Brown, 2017 ME 59, ¶ 8 n.4, --- A.3d ---. It is possible to conceive of facts by which the operation of a vehicle is caused by a spasm, seizure, or convulsion.

State v. Nigro

24 A.3d 1283 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 19, 2011

State v. … See United States v. Brown, 500 F.3d 48, 54 (1st Cir.2007) ("Since [the informant] was known to the police, he could have been held accountable if his information proved inaccurate or false.”).

Bean v. Butler

155 Me. 106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 18, 1959

The rule is well stated in Ward v. … Hamlin v. N. H. Bragg & Sons, 128 Me. 358 .

Witham v. Wing

108 Me. 364 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1911

In the case of Palmer v. … Brown v. Lawton, 87 Maine, 86; Bugbee v. Sargent, 23 Maine, 269.

International Paper Company v. State

248 A.2d 749 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 26, 1968

Bilodeau Realty, Inc. v. Lewiston Urban Renew. Authority (1968) 237 A.2d 398 (Me.), and that of the president of the *751 plaintiff corporation in Knox Lime Company v. … In Warren v.

State of Maine v. Ronald A. Harding

2024 ME 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 2024

State v. Brown, 2017 ME 59, ¶ 9, 158 A.3d 501. [¶15] Harding claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he inflicted a traumatic brain injury causing the victim’s death. Although he includes Dr. … State v.

Prince v. Maine Central Railroad

122 Me. 130 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 25, 1922

Moran v. Street Railway, supra, has no application to this state of facts. 2. Contributory Negligence. … Apparently the plaintiff and his companion King, thinking that the hand car with its load of materials and tools weighing several hundred pounds might afford a serious obstruction to the train and endanger the lives on board

Guardianship of Ella M. Grenier

185 A.3d 728 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 8, 2018

Pitts v. … See Tucker v.

State of Maine v. Jerry Philogene

2018 ME 126 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 23, 2018

Haskell v. … Moulton v. Brown, 627 A.2d 521, 523 (Me. 1993). [¶21] Philogene timely filed a Rule 60(b) motion and has continued to seek to have the merits of his argument heard.

Brinley v. Spring

7 Me. 241 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1831

Haskell v. Greely, 3 Greenl. 425 ; Reed v. Jewett, 5 Greenl. 96 ; Holbrook v. Baker, ibid. 309 ; Badlam v. Tucker, 1 Pick. 389. … Before eleven o’clock on the same morning, King went on board of the vessel himself, and repeated the same directions.

Haskell Implement & Seed Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

114 Me. 277 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 28, 1915

Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S., 542 , and cases cited; Boston & Maine Railroad v. Hooker, 233 U. S., 97 , and cases cited; Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Plff. in Error, v. … Co. v.

O'GRADY v. Partridge

319 A.2d 115 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 1974

French, Appellant, 134 Me. 140 , 183 A. 130 (1936); American Can Co. v. Milk Control Board, 313 Mass. 156 , 46 N.E.2d 542, 545 (1943). … Pettingill v. Pettingill, 60 Me. 411 (1872).