Case law

Hird v. Bath Iron Works Corp.

512 A.2d 1035 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 22, 1986

Mullen v. Brown Homes, Inc., 358 A.2d 557, 560 (Me.1976) (commission has no equitable powers to allow employer to suspend its payment of compensation following receipt of 3rd party recovery by employee). … In Pino v.

State v. Day

79 Me. 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1887

State v. Quimby, 51 Maine, 395. … State v. Wright, 53 Maine, 344; State v. Forshner, 43 N. H. 89.

Morse v. Machias Water Power & Mill Co.

42 Me. 119 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

In Bush v. … Attorney General v. Nichol, 16 Vesey, 338.

State v. Elliott

987 A.2d 513 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 21, 2010

For instance, the right to travel is not violated by statutes that require protective headgear when riding a motorcycle, id., or regulate the recreational use of a river for rafting, Brown v. … See Brown v. Dep’t of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife, 577 A.2d 1184 , 1185 & n. 4 (Me.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1122 , 111 S.Ct. 1078 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1183 (1991). 11 .

State v. Nason

498 A.2d 252 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 3, 1985

See State v. Brown, 479 A.2d 1317, 1318 (Me.1984); State v. Henderson, 435 A.2d 1106, 1108 (Me.1981). … State v. Johnson, 434 A.2d 532, 537 (Me.1981); see State v. Pickering, 491 A.2d 560 (Me.1985).

Drake v. Town of Sanford

643 A.2d 367 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1994

Lerman v. City of Portland, 675 F.Supp. 11, 16 (D.Me.1987) (citing Culebras Enters. Corp. v. Rivera Rios, 813 F.2d 506, 515 (1st Cir.1987)). Maine does allow inverse condemnation claims. See Foss v. … Zoning Board of Appeals, 313 A.2d 741, 746-47 (Me.1974) (allowing such temporal distinctions to arrest unwanted trends).

Maquoit Bay LLC v. Department of Marine Resources

271 A.3d 1183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2022

See Kurzon v. U.S. … In Uliano I, we vacated a Board of Environmental Protection decision after holding that the Board misapplied the Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) rule that “‘no activity shall be permitted if there is a practicable

J.R.M., Inc. v. City of Portland

669 A.2d 159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 26, 1995

In Mitchell v. … (quoting Hall v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me.1985)). III.

Chase v. Chase

55 Me. 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867

Deane v. Richmond, 5 Pick., 468 . Alimony or maintenance was granted the wife, for her separate use during the absence from the bed and board of her continuing husband.

State v. Lovell

390 A.2d 1107 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 6, 1978

State v. Pomerleau, Me., 363 A.2d 692 (1976). … State v. Elwell, supra. The entry is: Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed. .

Inhabitants of Milford v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.

104 Me. 233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1908

In Watson v. … In Stock v.

State v. Blackington

111 Me. 229 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 5, 1913

This, however, is but a restatement of the view expressed in State v. Robinson, 85 Maine, 195. … Without further comment, if precedents were required, we think State v. Robinson and Commonwealth v.

Gould v. Bangor & Piscataquis Railroad

82 Me. 122 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1889

This principle was decided in McCluer v. Manchester & Lawrence Railroad, 13 Gray, 124 , 129. True that case was founded upon an alleged breach of a contract. But the defense was the same as in this. … It must, perhaps, be further conceded that a fence made of barbed wire “protected by an upper rail or board of wood,” may, under the proviso attached to § 1, c. 22, R.

Pride v. King

133 Me. 378 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1935

McLellan v. Crofton, supra, at page 337; Lancey v. Maine Central Railroad, supra. … Words & Phrases, Third Series, Vol. 1, page 145; McMahon v. Brown, 219 Mass., 23, 27 , 106 N. E., 576 , 578; Chace v. Trafford, 116 Mass., 529, 532 .

Woodward v. Livermore Falls Water District

116 Me. 86 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 6, 1917

Piper v. Madison, 140 Wis., 311 ; 122 N. W., 730 ; People v. Detroit, 28 Mich., 229 ; 15 Am. Rep., 202 ; Aldrich v. Tripp, 11 R. I., 141; 23 Am. Rep., 434 ; Judson ,v. Winsted, 80 Conn., 384 ; 68 Atl., 999 ; Wagner v. … E., 545 ; Esberg Cigar Co. v. Portland, 34 Ore., 282 ; 55 Pac., 961 ; Brown v. Salt Lake City, 33 Utah, 222 ; 93 Pac., 540 ; Hourigan v. Norwich, 77 Conn., 358 ; 59 Atl., 487 ; Lynch v.

Damon v. S.D. Warren Co.

990 A.2d 1028 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 23, 2010

We are thus presented with the question that we expressly left open in Pendexter v. … See, e.g., id,.; Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 651 A.2d 358, 360-61 (Me.1994); Berry v. H.R.

Somes v. White

65 Me. 542 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 18, 1876

In Sproat v. … In Sproul v.

Talberth v. Guy Gannett Publishing Co.

149 Me. 286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 1953

Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. McGovern, (Penn.), 174 Atl. 400, 404 , (underscoring ours), citing Lynch v. U. S., 292 U. S. 571 , 54 S. Ct. 840 . In Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. … McBride v. Retirement Board (Penn.), 199 Atl. 130, 132 .

State of Maine v. Dale F. Thistle

2024 ME 6 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 25, 2024

See State v. Hanscom, 2016 ME 184, ¶ 10, 152 A.3d 632; State v. Lajoie, 2017 ME 8, ¶ 13, 154 A.3d 132; supra n.2. … State v.

State v. Dow

392 A.2d 532 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 20, 1978

Leasing Corp. v. United States, 429 U.S. 338 , 97 S.Ct. 619 , 50 L.Ed.2d 530 (1977); United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38 , 96 S.Ct. 2406 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 (1976); Air Pollution Variance Board v. … Burney v. United States, 339 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1964); Commonwealth v. Welch, 142 Mass. 473 , 8 N.E. 342 (1886); Napolet v. Board of Liquor Control, 119 N.E.2d 93 (Ohio App.1953); Williams v.