Case law

Bartlett v. Newton

148 Me. 279 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 14, 1952

Crosman v. Fuller, 17 Pick. 171 ; Bu *284 ckanon v. Adams, 49 N. J. L. 636, 10 A. 662 , 60 Am. Rep. 666 ; Patrick v. Petty, 83 Ala. 420 , 3 So. 779 ; Consolidated Oil Co. v. Schaffner, (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. … v.

City of Bangor v. Peirce

106 Me. 527 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1910

Smith v. Portland, 30 Fed. 734 ; Carey v. Brown, 92 U. S. 171 , at page 172 and cases there cited; Obert v. Bordine, 20 N. J. L. 394; 1 Perry on Trusts (3 Ed.); sec. 32. … Baldwin v. Trustee, 37 Maine, 369; Tracy v. Reed, 38 Fed. 69 ; Miner v. Pingree, 110 Mass. 47 ; Richardson v. Boston, 148 Mass. 508 ; Knight v. Boston, 159 Mass. 551 ; Dunham v. Lowell, 200 Mass. 468 ; Latrobe v.

Bradbury v. Cony

62 Me. 223 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

In Coster v. … In McDaniels v.

Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Correction

431 A.2d 1304 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 10, 1981

Cote v. Zoning Board of Appeals, Me., 398 A.2d 419, 420 (1979); Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, *1307 Inc., Me., 217 A.2d 217, 224 (1966). … As we emphasized in Chase v.

State v. Hudson

325 A.2d 56 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 6, 1974

People v. Brown, 131 Ill.App.2d 244 , 266 N.E.2d 131 (1970). … State v. Shannon, 135 Me. 325 , 196 A. 636 (1938). If the Justice attempts a summation of the evidence, the position of one side must not be emphasized unfairly. State v. Brown, 142 Me. 16 , 45 A.2d 442 (1946).

Lancaster v. Augusta Water District

108 Me. 137 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1911

Wilson v. Hathaway, 42 Iowa, 173 ; McIntire v. … York Shore, Water Co., 94 Maine, 83; Brown v. Gerald, 100 Maine, 351; Holt v.

First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine Turnpike Auth.

153 Me. 131 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 1957

Detroit v. Detroit Street Ry. 184 U. S. 368, 394 ; Louisville City Ry. v. Louisville, 71 Kentucky, (8 Bush), 534; West River Bridge v. Dix, 6 How. 507, 534 ; Board of Morristown v. East Tenn. Tel. Co., 115 Fed. … Rorick v. Board of Com’rs of Everglades Drainage Dist., 57 F. (2nd) 1048 (Fla.) (1932). P. 1055.

Ziehl Ex Rel. Ziehl v. Maine National Bank

383 A.2d 1364 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 1978

See Webb v. … Brown et al., 152 Me. 360, 371-377 , 131 A.2d 191 (1957).

Weeks v. State

267 A.2d 641 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 16, 1970

It follows the Parole Board was without jurisdiction to extend the parole eligibility date to December 5, 1969.” … As stated in United States v.

Maine Central Railroad v. Public Utilities Commission

156 Me. 284 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1960

Co. v. Railroad Commission (1949), 220 S. … Lines v. Board of Pub. U. (1950), 5 N.

Lawrence v. Richards

111 Me. 95 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 12, 1913

Bangor v. County Commissioners, 87 Maine, 294; Spelling on Extraordinary Remedies, sections 687, 1384. This principle is admitted in argument by the petitioner. … It is proper to say that the case of Robbins v.. Railway Co., ioo Maine, 496, on which the petitioner strongly relies, is easily distinguishable from this ¡case.

Kidder v. Inhabitants of Knox

48 Me. 551 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1860

, testified, without objection, that “ he purchased the liquors named in said account annexed, in Boston, in his said capacity as one of the selectmen of Knox, under the direction and by the decree of a majority of said board … See Wilkins v. Reed, 6 Maine, 220, 2d ed., and note by editor, citing Butts v. Dean, 2 Met., 76 ; C urtis v. Hubberd, 9 Met., 328 , and Perrin v. Keene, 19 Maine, 355. Nonsuit taken off, and Case to stand for trial.

Inhabitants of Topsham v. Purinton

94 Me. 354 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 31, 1900

It was properly observed in Cressey v. … But in Inhabitants of Norridgewock v.

Town of Mount Desert v. Smith

751 A.2d 445 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 2000

. [¶ 4] After the last deadline passed, the Board of Selectmen authorized legal action against Smith for the “autograveyard and junkyard violations.” The Town filed a Land Use Citation and Complaint pursuant to M.R. … See, e.g., Banks v.

Inhabitants of Milford v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.

106 Me. 316 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1909

In Hone v. … In the leading case of Hadley v.

Saliem v. Glovsky

132 Me. 402 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1934

Wheeler v. Nichols, 32 Me., 233, 240; Gower v. Stevens, 19 Me., 92; Brown v. Howard, 86 Me., 342, 344, 29 A., 1094 . … Knight v. Herrin, 48 Me., 533.

Central Maine Power Co. v. Waterville Urban Renewal Authority

281 A.2d 233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 9, 1971

See, Burke v. Board of Representatives of Stamford, 1961, 148 Conn. 33 , 166 A.2d 849 ; 62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 160; 37 Am.Jur., Municipal Corporations, § 52. … See, Boston Edison Company v. Board of Selectmen of Concord, supra.

State v. Haag

48 A.3d 207 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 2012

State v. … State v.

Cote v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

596 A.2d 1004 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 18, 1991

In Smyers v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 157 Cal. … Clair v. County of Grant, 110 N.M. 543, 552 , 797 P.2d 993, 1002 (N.M.Ct.App.1990); Ross v. Northern States Power Co., 442 N.W.2d 296, 300 (Minn.1989); Trejo v.

Calaska Partners Ltd. v. Corson

672 A.2d 1099 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1996

The Board thereafter promulgated Regulation B, that provides in pertinent part: (d) Signature of spouse or other person. (1) Rule for qualified applicant. … F.D.I.C. v.