Case law

Goodspeed v. Fuller

46 Me. 141 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

In Bambridge v. … . & R., 329, or that it was paid by some one other than the grantee, and thus raise a resulting trust, as in Scoby v. Blanchard, 3 N. H. 170. Pritchard v. Brown, 4 N. H. 397; Dudley v. Bosworth, 10 Humph. 9 .

Kennebec Water District v. City of Waterville

96 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 3, 1902

Allen v. Jay, supra; Talbot v. Hudson, 16 Gray, 417 ; Concord Railroad v. Greeley, supra; Olmstead v. Proprietors of Aqueduct, 47 N. J. L. 311. … V.

Dyer v. Maine Central Railroad

120 Me. 154 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1921

Smith v. M. C. R. R. Co., 87 Maine, 348. … A sign board as required by R. S., Chap. 56, Sec. 72, was at the time of the accident maintained by the defendant.

In Re Erika R.

563 A.2d 369 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1989

See, e.g., Minott v. F.W. Cunningham & Sons, 413 A.2d 1325, 1329-30 (Me.1980); Parker v. Hohman, 250 A.2d 698, 702 (Me.1969). … State v.

O'Connor v. Beale

143 Me. 387 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 1948

Thompson et al. v. Bowes, 115 Me. 6 ; 97 A. 1 ; 1 A. L. R. 1365; Dartnell v. Bidwell, 115 Me. 227 ; 98 A. 743 ; 5 A. L. R. 1320; Burnham v. Burnham et al., 130 Me. 409 , 156 A. 823 . … Ed. 440 ; and in Crosier v. Brown, 66 W. Va. 273 ; 66 S. E. 326 ; 25 L. R. A., N.

Russell v. Accurate Abatement, Inc.

694 A.2d 921 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 6, 1997

French v. Willman, 599 A.2d 1151, 1152 (Me.1991); Dongo v. Banks, 448 A.2d 885, 889-90 (Me.1982). Whether a particular building code ordinance applies to the facts of a case is a question of law for the court. … Swallow v.

Penobscot Railroad v. Weeks

52 Me. 456 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1864

In Harris v. … In Capel v.

Rhoades v. Varney

91 Me. 222 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 5, 1898

Mayhew v. Sullivan Mining Co., 76 Maine, 100, 108; Buzzell v. Laconia Manf. Co., 48 Maine, 113; Shanny v. Androscoggin Mills Co., 66 Maine, 420. … Nason v.

Sleeper v. Union Insurance

61 Me. 267 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1872

.” *271 The vessel was lost within the lime specified in the policy, with all on board, among whom was E. K. Alexander, the master. Annie 1). Alexander, the widow of E. K. … Burnham v. Ellis, 39 Maine, 320. The same rule applies to prospective intentions. The declarations as testified to by Frye are either the statements of what Alexander had done or proposed doing.

State v. Tauvar

461 A.2d 1065 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1983

Creamer was also the vice president of the corporation and a member of the board of directors. Creamer met the officer outside the hall and informed him that Tauvar, an “unwanted guest,” was inside the hall. … State v. Thibeault, 402 A.2d 445, 449 (Me.1979); State v. Tullo, 366 A.2d 843, 848 (Me.1976). By using “lawful” to describe “order,” therefore, the legislature intended that “lawful” have some independent meaning.

Smith v. Kennard

496 A.2d 660 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 1985

See Willette v. Umhoeffer, 245 A.2d 540, 542 (Me.1968). IV. … See Brown v. State, Department of Manpower Affairs, 426 A.2d 880, 887 (Me.1981).

Bither v. Packard

115 Me. 306 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 13, 1916

In Woodman v. … Co. v. Hill, 60 Maine, 178, 184. In the case of Chesterfield v.

Jackson Brook Institute, Inc. v. Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

861 A.2d 652 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 10, 2004

See Witkowski v. Brown, 576 A.2d 669, 672 (Del.Super.Ct.1989); Oliver v. Okla. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Guar. Ass’n, 774 S.W.2d 902, 904 (Mo.Ct.App.1989); Burke v. … Ass’n v. Harris, 827 P.2d 1139, 1142-43 (Colo.1992); Hasemann v. White, 177 Ill.2d 414 , 226 Ill.Dec. 788 , 686 N.E.2d 571, 573-74 (1997); Hetzel v.

Young v. Potter

133 Me. 104 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 10, 1934

Avery v. Thompson, 117 Me., 120, 123, 103 A., 4 ; Raymond v. Portland R. R. Co., 100 *113 Me., 529, 62 A., 602 ; Wilkinson v. Drew, 75 Me.,, 363; Pomroy v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 102 Me., 497, 67 A., 561 ; Bacon v. … Jenkins v. North Shore Dye House, Inc., 277 Mass., 440, 444 , 178 N. E., 644 ; Lounsbury v. McCormick, 237 Mass., 328, 337 , 129 N. E., 598 ; Ayers v. Ratshesky, 213 Mass., 589, 593 , 101 N. E., 78 .

Fortin v. Johnson

150 Me. 294 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 24, 1954

See Treasure Island Catering Co. v. State Board of E., 19 Calif. (2nd) 181, 120. P. (2nd) 1 (1941). See also 139 A.L.R. 392 . Clauses (c) and (d) were enacted in Rhode Island in 1947-48. … Treasure Island Catering Co. v. State Board of E., supra; 47 Am. Jur. 223 , Sales and Use Taxes, § 18.

Knowlton v. Attorney General

976 A.2d 973 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 28, 2009

Addy v. … See id.; see also Reid v.

Scott v. M'Lellan

2 Me. 199 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1823

In Jones v. … Hubbly v. Brown & al. 16 Johns. 70 . was assumpsit by the indorsee against the defendants, as indorsers of a note made by Rufus Clap, payable to their order.

State v. Boynton

379 A.2d 994 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 18, 1977

Small v. Maine Board of Registration and Examination in Optometry, Me., 293 A.2d 786, 788 (1972). … Finks v. Maine State Highway Commission, Me., 328 A.2d 791, 796 (1974). The statutes here challenged withstand the constitutional attack. As for standards, 12 M.R.S.A. §§ 4251-4252 are patently conservation measures.

Curtis v. Androscoggin Lodge, No. 24

99 Me. 356 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 1904

. • And a similar situation existed in Foxcroft v. … First Society of Hartford v. Hartford, 66 Conn. 368 ; Saint Mary’s Church v. Tripp, 14 R. I. 307; Salem, Lyceum v. Salem, 154 Mass. 15 ; Harvard College v. Assessors of Cambridge, 175 Mass. 145 .

State of Maine v. Nicholas P. Lovejoy

2024 ME 42 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 23, 2024

stains on the toe of a boot, red or brown stains on a roll of duct tape, a bottle of ammonia in the bathroom, and a mop in the kitchen sink. … State v.