Case law

State v. Thomes

697 A.2d 1262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 10, 1997

See State v. … Brown, 552 A.2d 12, 14 (Me.1988) (although evidence not excluded pursuant to Rule 404(b) was unfavorable to defendant, it was relevant and probative on issue of opportunity and was not so prejudicial to rise to level of obvious

State v. Boynton

379 A.2d 994 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 18, 1977

Small v. Maine Board of Registration and Examination in Optometry, Me., 293 A.2d 786, 788 (1972). … Finks v. Maine State Highway Commission, Me., 328 A.2d 791, 796 (1974). The statutes here challenged withstand the constitutional attack. As for standards, 12 M.R.S.A. §§ 4251-4252 are patently conservation measures.

Daley v. COM'R, DEPT. OF MARINE RESOURCES

698 A.2d 1053 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 1997

Richardson, 285 A.2d 842, 844-45 (Me.1972) (state may legitimately prohibit possession of lobsters on board any boat rigged for otter or beam trawling). … Board of Bar Overseers v.

Cady v. Tuttle

127 Me. 104 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1928

II, Sec. 989; Haley v. Palmer, 107 Me., 314; Buck v. Swasey, 35 Me., 50; Lawry v. Spaulding, 73 Me., 33; Young v. Snow, 167 Mass., 287, 288 , 23 R. C. L., 573, 575; Ricker v. … Coates v. Lunt, 210 Mass., 314, 318 ; Brown v. Cowell, 116 Mass., 461 ; Perry on Trusts, 5th Ed., Vol. I, Sec. 195; Farnam v. Brooks, 9 Pick., 212 . From the record in this case, an assignment or release by Mrs.

Crosby v. Maine Central Railroad

113 Me. 270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1915

Norcross, 162 Mass., 546 (the case of a child of about six years of age), Gleason v. Smith, 180 Mass., 6 , (a boy of twelve), Godfrey v. Boston Elevated Ry., 215 Mass., 432 , (a boy of seven); Brown v. European & N. A. … Day v. R. R., supra.

Estate of Campbell

704 A.2d 329 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 1997

John, relying on Gaulin v. … See Hall v. Hall, 106 Me. 389, 391 , 76 A. 705, 706 (1910); Brown v. Dickey, 106 Me. 97, 103 , 75 A. 382, 385 (1909).

Chandler v. Wilson

77 Me. 76 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 1885

Tebbetts v. Estes, 52 Maine, 566 ; Hubbard v. Little, 9 Cush. 475 ; Hunt v. Hunt, 3 Metc. 175 . … J., in Dewey v. Brown, 2 Pick. 387 , a case in point. Somes v. Skinner, 3 Pick. 52 ; 1 Wash. Re. Pr. 421; Bruce v. Mitchell, 39 Maine, 390. Judgment for demandant for three-fifths undivided of the premises demanded.

Curtis v. Maine State Highway Commission

160 Me. 262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 1964

The amount of just compensation was decided by the Land Damage Board. The instant plaintiff and defendant each appealed from the decision of the Board. … Portland and Rochester Railroad Company v. Inhabitants of Deering, 78 Me. 61, 66, 67 . See also Gilmore v.

State v. Morton

125 Me. 9 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 2, 1925

State v. Rogers, 95 Maine, 94; State v. Chadwick, 119 Maine, 45. These principles applied to the contentions of the respondent upon this branch of the case render futile the exceptions immediately under consideration. … The present statute enjoins immediate liberation alive, of short lobsters, State v. Chadwick, supra.

Pope v. Remisa

463 A.2d 714 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1983

See Calthorpe v. Abrahamson, 423 A.2d 231, 233-34 (Me.1980). II. … Thornton v. Estate of Cressey, 413 A.2d 540, 544 (Me.1980); see M.R.Civ.P. 53(c), (e)(1); Boothbay Harbor Condominiums v. Department of Transportation, 382 A.2d 848, 853 (Me.1978).

State of Maine v. Calixte Fleury

2025 ME 18 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 2025

State v. … The sergeant permitted him to do so but searched him beforehand and located a bag in Fleury’s groin area that contained brown powder, later determined to be 18 grams of fentanyl.

Villar v. Kernan

695 A.2d 1221 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1997

State v. … See, e.g., Ulmer v.

State v. Sheehan

337 A.2d 253 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 5, 1975

State v. Grant, 284 A.2d 674, 676 (1971). See also State v. Atkinson, Me., 325 A.2d 44 (1974); State v. Levesque, 146 Me. 351 , 81 A.2d 665 (1951). … hole appeared to have been created by the removal of a section of ceiling tile; on entering the stockroom, the officers found that above this ceiling hole was an overhead area of the stockroom from the floor of which two •boards

Stone v. Waitt

31 Me. 409 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

The hay in this case “ was shipped on board the schooner Echo, of which the defendant was master, to *413 be carried to Boston, and consigned, or entrusted to the defendant as master of said vessel, for sale.” … The Waldo, before cited; Lawler v. Keaquick, 1 Johns. Cas. 174 ; Day v. Noble, 2 Pick. 615 .

Alexander v. Division of Community Services

556 A.2d 222 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 1989

M.R.Civ.P. 80B(a); see Lyons v. Board of Directors of School Admin. Dist. No. 43, 503 A.2d 233, 235 (Me.1986).

Annis v. Butterfield

99 Me. 181 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 30, 1904

Robinson v. Robinson, 73 Maine, 170; Gamage v. Harris, 79 Maine, 531; Frost v. Walls, 93 Maine, 405. … Brown v. Kimball Company, 84 Maine, 492. But this statutory equitable remedy is limited to creditors, and therefore cannot be invoked in this case. This is the case of ,a purchaser, not a creditor.

Perry v. Cobb

49 L.R.A. 389 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 11, 1896

Andover v. County Commissioners, 86 Maine, 185; Fletcher v. Railroad, 74 Maine, 434; Jones v. Larrabee, 47 Maine, 474; Warren v. Baxter, 48 Maine, 193. … Co. v. Adler, 65 Md. 162 ; Baldwin v. London C. & D. Railway Co. L. R. 9 Q. B. 582; Baker v. Insurance Co. 12 Gray, 603 ; Cory v. Boylston Ins. Co. 107 Mass. 140; Boyd v. Dubois, 3 Camp. 133.

Inhabitants of Lewiston v. Inhabitants of Androscoggin

151 Me. 457 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 1956

The controversy here is over $7,370.71 which the City of Lewiston paid to the Board of Trustees of the Maine State Retirement System on September 28, 1954, which sum it deducted from its 1954 county tax. … Steele v. Smalley, 141 Me. 355 , 44 A. (2nd) 213 (1945). However, as said by this court in Sweeney v.

Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77

2000 Me. 143 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2000

See United States v. … See, e.g., Miller v. Board of Educ., Unified Sch. Dist. No. 470, 12 Kan.App.2d 368 , 744 P.2d 865, 868 (1987), aff'd 242 Kan. 817 , 752 P.2d 113 (1988).

Kennebec Water District v. City of Waterville

96 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 3, 1902

Allen v. Jay, supra; Talbot v. Hudson, 16 Gray, 417 ; Concord Railroad v. Greeley, supra; Olmstead v. Proprietors of Aqueduct, 47 N. J. L. 311. … V.