Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

0.72s

  • Cayton v. National Sea Products

    373 A.2d 1229 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 9, 1977

    Kidder v. Coastal Construction Co., Me., 309 A.2d 119, 122 (1973). The commission’s decree is critically deficient. The commission accepted Dr. … Johnson v. Kostis Fruit Co., Me., 281 A.2d 318, 320 (1971); see Clark v. State Employees Appeals Board, Me., 363 A.2d 735, 737-39 (1976).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Murray v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.

    117 Me. 165 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1918

    Duchemin v. Springfield St. Ry. Co., 186 Mass., 353 ; Payne v. … To the same effect is Hines v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 198 Mass., 346 ; Benston v. Same, 202 Mass., 577 The nonsuit was properly ordered. Exceptions overruled.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wagner v. Congress Square Hotel Co.

    115 Me. 190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 18, 1916

    Shaw v. Berry, 31 Maine, 478; Norcross v. Norcross, 53 Maine, 163. … Milliken v. Randall, 89 Maine, 200; Foster v. Essex Bank, 17 Mass., 479 ; Brown v. Waterman, 10 Cush., 117 ; Lichtenhein v. B. & P. R. Co., 11 Cush., 70 ; Maynard v. Buck, 100 Mass., 40 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Strout v. Lord

    103 Me. 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 10, 1908

    It was so expressly held in Hemmenway v. Lynde, 79 Maine, 299. See, also, Bird v. Keller, 77 Maine, 270. … Hawes v. Williams, 92 Maine, 483.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • South Bay Meadow Dam Co. v. Gray

    30 Me. 547 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

    Trott v. Warren, 2 Fairf. 227; Penobscot Boom Corporation v. Lamson, 16 Maine, 224; State v. Carr, 5 N. H. 367; Ameriscoggin Bridge v. Bragg, 11 N. H. 102; Middlesex Husbandmen v. Davis, 3 Metc. 133 . … The Queen v. Corporation of Durham, 10 Mod. 146; People v. Runkel, 9 Johns. 147 ; McCall v. Byram, 6 Conn. 428 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Littlebrook Airpark Condominium Association v. Sweet Peas, LLC

    81 A.3d 348 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 31, 2013

    Underwriters, Inc. v. Estate of Faulkner, 2008 ME 149, ¶ 5, 957 A.2d 94. We have discretion to accept or reject a report pursuant to Rule 24, see Despres v. … Co., 663 A.2d 6, 8 (Me. 1995); see also Morris v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ramsdell v. Ramsdell

    21 Me. 288 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1842

    Pells v. Brown, Cro. Jac. 592 ; Jackson v. Robins, 16 Johns. 589 . … Attorney General v. Hall, Fitzg. 314; Timewell v. Perkins, 2 Atk. 102; Ide v. Ide, 5 Mass. R. 500 ; Burbank v. Whitney, 24 Pick. 146 ; Jack *294 son v. Coleman, 2 Johns. 391 ; Jackson v. Bull, 10 Johns. 18 ; Jackson v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Boucher v. Maine Employment Security Commission

    464 A.2d 171 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 1983

    Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 35 Pa.Cmwlth. 647, 650 , 387 A.2d 510, 511 (1978) (general rule is that when one accepts job, he admits suitability of that job). … Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Board of Review, 122 N.J.Super. 366, 370 , 300 A.2d 572, 575 (1973); see Therrien v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Terroni

    270 A.2d 75 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 1970

    Brown *77 rigg, 87 Me. 500, 502 , 33 A. 11 , and followed in State v. Peloquin, 106 Me. 358, 362 , 76 A. 888 . … State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Simpson v. Ritchie

    110 Me. 299 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 1913

    Hinkley v. Fowler, 15 Maine, 289; Porter et als. v. Railroad, 37 Maine, 349; Packard v. Brewster, 59 Maine, 404; Varney v. Bradford, 86 Maine, 514; Baldwin v. Emery, 89 Maine, 497. … Davies v. Skinner, 58 Wis., 638 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Jonesport v. Inhabitants of Beals

    131 Me. 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 8, 1932

    The legislature fixed no limit to the time within which the commissioners should act, and the reasoning in Auburn v. … The giving of notice of the meeting of a board of arbitrators in a case such as this is required. Auburn v. Paul, supra. But in such case, actual notice will suffice. Second Soc. of Universalists v. Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Millett

    392 A.2d 521 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 19, 1978

    Millett was carrying a pistol the brown colored handle of which with trigger hammer was protruding from his belt in plain view of Osborne. … State v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Bradbury Memorial Nursing Home v. Tall Pines Manor Associates

    485 A.2d 634 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1984

    See Williams v. … See also Lundrigan v. Maine Labor Relations Board, 482 A.2d 834 (Me.1984); Council 74, AFSCME v. Maine State Employees Association, 476 A.2d 699, 703 (Me.1984).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Garland v. Hilborn

    23 Me. 442 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1844

    The cases of Butterfield v. Baker, 5 Pick. 522 ; Bailey v. Fillebrown, 9 Greenl. 12; and Turner v. … In the case of D’ Wolf & al. v. Brown, cited for the defendant, the plaintiff’s testator had agreed with his son, for a certain amount of compensation, to manage his farm, and to take his pay in the produce of it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Poor

    40 Me. 415 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1885

    It was held in Smith v. … Robinson v. Smith, 3 Paige, 222 ; Hersey v. Veazie, 24 Maine, 9; Cunningham v. Pitt, 5 Paige, 607 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Tripp v. Park Street Motor Corp.

    122 Me. 59 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 30, 1922

    Chitty on Pleading, Vol. 1 pages 301, 302; Bean v. Ayers, 67 Maine, 488; Brown v. Starbird, 98 Maine, 292; Coffin v. Hall, 106 Maine, 126, 128; Hopkins v. Erskine, 118 Maine, 276. The case of Chickering v. … See Smith v. Hunt, 91 Maine, 572; Copeland v. Hewett, 93 Maine, 556; Cole v. Cole, 112 Maine, 315; Gilbert v. Cushman, 113 Maine, 525; Stowell v. Hooper, 121 Maine, 152.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hamlin v. Perticuler Baptist Meeting House

    103 Me. 343 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1907

    Paúl shall stand,” Walsingham’s Case, 2 Plowd. 557, "As long as used for said canal,” State v. Brown, 27 N. J. … Packard v. Old Colony R. R. Co., 168 Mass. 92 ; Craig v. Inhs. of Franklin Co., 58 Maine, 479.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kimball v. North East Harbor Water Co.

    107 Me. 467 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 1911

    v. … Lumbard v. Stevens, 4 Cush. 60 ; Turner v. Revere Water Co., 171 Mass. 329 ; Water Co. v. Adams, 84 Maine, 472; Wood v. Auburn, 87 Maine, 287; Robbins v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Marcel Dubois v. Department of Environmental Protection

    2017 ME 224 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 7, 2017

    v. … v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Watson v. Portland & Cape Elizabeth Railway Co.

    44 L.R.A. 157 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 13, 1898

    Meesel v. Lynn & Boston Railroad Co., 8 Allen, 234 ; Maguire v. Middlesex Railroad Co., 115 Mass. 239 ; Fleck v. Union Railway Co., 134 Mass. 480 ; Germantown Passenger Railway Co. v. Walling, 97 Penn. St. 55; Vail v. … Elliot v. Newport Street Railway Co., 18 R. I. 707, (23 L. R. A. 208): Pray v. Omaha St. Railway Co., 44 Neb. 167 ; Wilde v. Lynn & Boston R. R. Co., 163 Mass. 533 ; Reber v. Pittsburg & B. Traction Co., 179 Penn.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.