Case law

State v. Cloutier

544 A.2d 1277 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1988

See State v. Wentworth, 480 A.2d 751, 757 (Me.1984). … Superior Court, 9 Cal.3d 626 , 108 Cal.Rptr. 585, 594 , 511 P.2d 33, 42 (1973), and to reasonable times of day, again depending on the circumstances, Brown v. State, 392 So.2d 280, 284 (Fla.App.1980).

State v. Toppi

275 A.2d 805 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1971

See: Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 151 , 348 F.2d 763 (1965) ; Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 220 , 370 F.2d 242 (1966). See: Bustillos v. … Wisdom, J., writing in Green v. United States, 309 F.2d 852 (CCA 5). Brown, J., dissenting in Huffman v. United States, 297 F.2d 754 (CCA 5).

Spaulding v. Adams

32 Me. 211 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

Bradeen v. Brooks, 22 Maine, 463; Oakes v. Moore, 24 Maine, 214. … Picquet v. McKay, 2 Blackf. 465 .

Chase v. Dwinal

7 Me. 134 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1830

Knibbs v. Hall, 1 Esp. 84 ; Brown v. M'Kinally, ibid. 279 ; Cartwright v. Rowley, 2 Esp. 723. These cases illustrate and enforce the legal maxim, volenti non fit injuria. … Moses v. McFarlane, 2 Burr. 1005; Smith v. Bromley, cited in Doug. 696. In Astley v.

Wood v. Superintendent of Insurance

638 A.2d 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 14, 1994

International Paper Co. v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 629 A.2d 597, 599 (Me.1993). … See State v.

Powers v. Patten

71 Me. 583 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1880

Crocker v. Pierce, 81 Maine, 177. And the defendant also relies upon the case of Blanchard v. … Wilson v. Widenham, 51 Maine, 566; Brown v.

State v. Smith

256 A.2d 580 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1969

See, Smith v. Speers, Opinion May 22, 1969, Me., 253 A.2d 701 . … State v. Allen, 1967, Me., 235 A.2d 529 .

LeClair v. Commercial Union Insurance

679 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1996

McCain Foods, Inc. v. Gervais, 657 A.2d 782, 783 (Me.1995) (citing C.N. Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1209 (Me.1990)). … State v.

Erskine v. Plummer

7 Me. 447 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1831

Bufa sale of growing grass, i Crosby v. Wadsworth, 6 East 602, was held to be within the staute. In Parker v. … In New York the sale of a growing crop by parol has been held good, and the authority of Crosby v. Wadsworth questioned. Newcomb v. Ramer, 2 Johns. 421, in note. Freer v. Hardenburgh, 5 Johns. 271 .

Keybank National Association v. Estate of Eula W. Quint

176 A.3d 717 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 2017

See State v. Dilley, 2008 ME 5, ¶ 25, 938 A.2d 804; State v. … See Teel v.

Eveleth v. Little

16 Me. 374 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1839

In the case of Heywood v. Hildreth, 9 Mass. R. 393 , it was decided, that the whole proceedings after the seizure, hare relation to the day of the seizure. And in Brown v. Maine Bank, 11 Mass. … In the case of Allen v.

Thompson v. Earle W. Noyes & Sons, Inc.

935 A.2d 663 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 20, 2007

Holt v. S.A.D. … Ladd v. Grinnell Corp., 1999 ME 76, ¶ 7 , 728 A.2d 1275, 1277 .

State v. Chase

490 A.2d 208 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1985

State v. … See also State v. Brown, 479 A.2d 1317, 1319 (Me.1984); State v. Chubbuck, 406 A.2d 282, 283 (Me.1979); State v. Gervais, 394 A.2d 1183, 1186 (Me.1978); State v. Pinkham, 383 A.2d 1355, 1357-58 (Me.1978). .

Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc.

600 A.2d 1111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1991

Senty v. Board of Osteopathic Examination & Registration, 594 A.2d 1068, 1072 (Me.1991). Neither the language nor the purpose of the statute requires us to vacate the Commission’s decision. … Nielsen’s additional argument based on Ashby v. Rust Etig’g Co., 559 A.2d 774 (Me.1989), is without merit. See Clark v. Rust Eng’g Co., 595 A.2d 416 (Me.1991); see also P.L.1991, ch. 615. §§ A-20, D-25.

State

153 Me. 469 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 13, 1958

Do any of the provisions of Sections 1 and 2 of Legislative Document 1637 delegate legislative power to the State Board of Education and the School District Commission in violation of Section 1 of Part First of Article IV … V.

Strickland v. Parker

54 Me. 263 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

Luffkin v. Griffiths, 35 Barb., 62 . Riley v. … Phillips v. Brown, 7 Gray, 26 . The common case of trees severed from the freehold and converted, which are always regarded as personal property, is another illustration of the general rule.

Beal v. Beal

388 A.2d 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 23, 1978

In White v. … In Levy v.

Rich v. Gilkey

73 Me. 595 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 28, 1881

Brunt v. Brunt, L. R. 3 Pro. and Div. 37 ; Cheese v. Lovejoy, L. R. 2 P. D. 251; Suyden v. Lord St. Leonards, L. R. 1 P. D. 154; James v. Shrimpton, L. R. 1 Pro. and D. 431; Brown v. … Brown, 8 Ell. and Bl. 876 ; Bowell v. Powell, 1 Pro. and D. (L. R.) 209. I therefore have no doubt, that a will destroyed by a person not possessing testamentary capacity, is not a revocation of such will.

Barnes v. Hathorn

54 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

Norcross v. Thoms, 51 Maine, 503, and more fully in the case of Brown v. Perkins, 12 Gray, 97 . It is unnecessary for us to repeat them here. … State v. Haines, 30 Maine, 65; Rex v. White, 1 Burr., 337; Fish v. Dodge, 4 Denio, 311 ; State v. Pierse, 4 McCord, 472 ; Catlin v. Valentine, 9 Paige, 575 ; Rex v. Neil, 2 Carr & Payne, 485.

Hann v. Merrill

305 A.2d 545 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 24, 1973

More than six years later, on July 29, 1969, the Secretary of the Board of Selectmen purported to amend the minutes by adding: “I, R. A. … Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 30 N.J. 381 , 153 A.2d 10 (1959); 50 Am.Jur., Statutes, § 28; 82C.J.S. Statutes § 380.