Case law

Eaton v. Town of Wells

760 A.2d 232 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 20, 2000

Warren Co. v. … Irene Brown, age 76, born and raised on the Mile Road accessing Wells Beach, testified to her memories of the beach.

Inhabitants of Andover v. McAllister

119 Me. 153 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1920

Richards, 10 Maine, 429, and followed in Hilborne v. Brown, 12 Maine, 162; Tapley v. Smith , 18 Maine, 12; and Peaks v. … Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass., 542 ; Thompson v. Vinton, 121 Mass., 139 ; Tibbetts v. Horne, 65 N. H., 242; Powers v. Dennison, 30 Vt., 752 ; Prince v. Case, 10 Conn., 375 ; Stillman v.

Denison Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Robinson Manufacturing Co.

74 Me. 116 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 2, 1882

In Garnsey v. … Burnham v. Hempton, 44 N.

Hawkins v. Hersey

86 Me. 394 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 24, 1894

Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass. 542 ; Thompson v. Vinton, 121 Mass. 139 ; Hunt v. Iron Co. 97 Mass. 279 . … Everett v. Hall, 67 Maine, 497; Brown v. Haynes, 52 Maine, 578.

City of Auburn v. City of Lewiston

85 Me. 282 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1893

The case of Salem v. Andover, 3 Mass. 442 , seems to be in point, although decided upon statutes differing from ours. The pauper, an adult, fell terribly sick with some loathsome disease at his parents’ home. … Eoss for care and board, and these had been approved by the overseers and were payable. The liability to pay them was a cause of action, precisely as if they had been paid. Fayette v.

State v. Gilbert

473 A.2d 1273 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1984

State v. Howes, 432 A.2d 419, 424 (Me.1981); see also State v. Brown, 410 A.2d 1033, 1034 (Me.1980). … As we stated in State v.

City of Auburn v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n

86 Me. 244 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 1894

Inhabitants of Foxcroft v. Piscataquis Valley Camp Meeting Association, ante, p. 78. That case fully covers and controls the present case. … Cressey v. Parks, 76 Maine, 532. Defendants defaulted.

State v. Parkinson

389 A.2d 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 5, 1978

Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 43 , 365 F.2d 976 (1966). See, United States v. Easter, 552 F.2d 230 (8th Cir. 1977); People v. Ramey, 16 Cal.3d 263 , 127 Cal. Rptr. 629 , 545 P.2d 1333 (1976). … In addition, appellant may also have been entitled to automatic standing under Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960). But see Brown v.

Jackson Advertising Corp. v. State Tax Assessor

551 A.2d 1365 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1988

See also Lovely v. … Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Presque Isle, 259 A.2d 666, 668 (Me.1969) {de novo proceeding in the Superior Court is still in the nature of appellate review; proper test on appeal is whether zoning board’s decision was

State v. Jobin

510 A.2d 527 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 29, 1986

Delaware v. Van Arsdall, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1435 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986). … Id.; see State v. Brown, 321 A.2d 478, 485 (Me.1985). In camera we have carefully examined Gilbert’s employment and military records, which the Superior Court had impounded.

Shaw v. McKenzie

131 Me. 248 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 13, 1932

Moore v. Protection Insurance Co., 29 Me., 97; Brown v. Moran, 42 Me., 44; Tomlinson v. Clement Bros., 130 Me., 189, 154 A., 355 . … In Jackson v.

Randall v. Patch

118 Me. 303 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 13, 1919

W., 64 ; Smith v. State Board, (Iowa), 117 N. W., 1117 . A hearing before a judicial tribunal is not essential, but there must be notice and a reasonable opportunity for a hearing before some tribunal. Bennett v. … E., 326 ; Miller v. Horton, 152 Mass., 544 ; Brill v. Ohio Humane Society, 4 Ohio C. C., 358; Sahr v. Scholle, 35 N. Y. S., 97; Goodwin v. Toucy, 71 Conn., 262 , 41 Atl., 806 ; Jenks v. Stump, (Col.), 93 Pac., 17 .

State v. F. H. Vahlsing, Inc.

147 Me. 417 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 10, 1952

the State Board of Agriculture, and three more appointed by the governor. … Rep. 629 ; Board of Directors of Alfalfa Irrigation District v. Collins, 46 Neb. 411 , 64 N.W. 1086 ; State v. Robinson, 35 Neb. 401 , 53 N.W. 213 , 17 L.R.A. 383 ; State v. Miller, 104 Neb. 838 , 178 N.W. 846 .

Sawyer v. Androscoggin Electric Co.

131 Me. 60 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1932

The plaintiff, while waiting to board a trolley car of the defendant, was struck by it and suffered serious injuries. … Haarland v. Maine Central Railroad Co., 125 Me., 52, 54. The case is distinguishable from Verrill v.

C-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Depositors Trust Co.

438 A.2d 262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1981

Brown v. Manchester, Me., 384 A.2d 449, 451 (1978); Nichols v. City of Rockland, Me., 324 A.2d 295, 297 (1974). … See Michaud v. Steckino, 390 A.2d at 534 , Towle v. Aube, 310 A.2d at 266 .

Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

156 Me. 295 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 16, 1960

Moore v. Protection Insurance Co., 29 Me., 97; Brown v. Moran, 42 Me., 44; Tomlinson v. Clement Bros., Inc., 130 Me. 189 .” Watkins Co. v. Brown, 134 Me. 473, 474 . … The Mill Act applies to reservoir dams as well as working dams, Brown v.

Lambert v. Wentworth

423 A.2d 527 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1980

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. … See *536 Barnes v. Board of Trustees, etc., 369 F.Supp. 1327 (D.C.W.D.Mich. 1973).

Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

651 A.2d 358 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1994

We have noted that decisions of the Board interpreting the Workers’ Compensation Act are “entitled to great deference and will be upheld on appeal unless the statute plainly compels a different result.” Nielsen v. … See 42 U.S.C. § 402 (v) (1993).

Carroll F. Look Construction Co. v. Town of Beals

802 A.2d 994 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 5, 2002

Monroe v. … Circa Ltd. v.

Chivvis v. Chivvis

158 Me. 354 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 18, 1962

Chiwis, and from his bed and board forever, as prayed for in the complaint, upon the ground of abandonment of the said plaintiff by the defendant ...” … See also Cole v. Blankenship, 30 Federal Reporter (2nd) 211, Adair v. Adair (Ala.), 62 S. (2nd) 437, 444 ; Re Bennett’s Estate, 34 N. Y. S. (2nd) 27; Thompson on Real Property, Sec. 841; 17A Am. Jur.