Case law

State v. D'ANGELO

605 A.2d 68 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 28, 1992

The State appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Browne, A.R.J.) reversing the denial of defendant Clement D’Angelo’s motion to suppress and vacating the judgment of the District Court (Millinocket … State v. Fuller, 556 A.2d 224 (Me.1989); State v.

State v. Shortsleeves

580 A.2d 145 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 30, 1990

State v. Huff, 469 A.2d 1251, 1253-54 (Me.1984). … See State v. Hallowell, 577 A.2d 778 (Me.1990).

Robinson v. Clark

76 Me. 493 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 13, 1884

Call v. Perkins, 65 Maine, 439 ; Hamlen v. McGillicuddy, 62 Maine, 268 ; R. S., c. 60 § 1. … It is said that money obtained from her exertions in raising and selling poultry upon the place has gone into its value, and that money received for her board at home while teaching school went in the same direction; and

Dale v. City of Bath

135 Me. 504 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 30, 1938

. *505 The plaintiff on April 1, 1936, was duly elected for the current year city solicitor of the City of Bath by a joint convention of the board of aldermen and the common council. … Van Buren Light & Power Co. v. Inhabitants of Van Buren, 116 Me., 119, 100 A., 371 . The presiding Justice in finding for the defendant decided against the plaintiff on these points.

Lajoie v. Bilodeau

148 Me. 359 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 7, 1953

Giguere v. Morrisette, 142 Me. 95 ; Andreu, Dostie v. Wellman, 144 Me. 36 . … Evidence in some negligence cases indicating carelessness, if not satisfactorily explained, may be conclusive (as wrong side of road in automobile cases), Larrabee v. Sewall, 66 Me. 376, 381 ; Brown v.

Richardson v. Richardson

146 Me. 145 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 6, 1951

See Ames v. Hilton, 70 Me. 36 (1879); Winslow v. Reed, 89 Me. 67 , 35 A. 1017 (1896); Coleman v. Lord, 96 Me. 192, 194 , 52 A. 645 (1902) and cases cited. See also Young v. Braman, 105 Me. 494, 497 , 75 A. 120 (1909). … In 1930 in Stuart et al. v.

State v. Perry

253 A.2d 705 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 5, 1969

These cases were State v. Elsey, tried January 25, 1967; and State v. Lingner, tried January 26, 1967. State v. … State v. Brown, 142 Me. 106 , 48 A.2d 242 . In the instant case counsel for the defendants argues that because of the alleged inconsistencies the witnesses were, in fact, committing perjury.

Morrill v. Noyes

56 Me. 458 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

Parker v. Browning, 8 Paige, 388 ; Wynne v. Newborough, 3 Bro. Ch., 88; Green v. Winter, 1 Johns. Ch., 60 . … Holly v. Brown, 14 Conn., 255 . A similar decision was made in this State, in the case of Head v. Goodwin, 37 Maine, 181. But that case was questioned in Jones v.

Bradstreet v. Clarke

394 A.2d 270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 5, 1978

Hilton v. State, Me., 348 A.2d 242 (1975); Statler Industries, Inc. v. Board of Environmental Protection, Me., 333 A.2d 703 (1975); Greenlaw v. Rodick, 158 Me. 440 , 185 A.2d 895 (1962); Beckwith v. … See Haskell v. Planning Board of Yarmouth, Me., 388 A.2d 100 (1978). As provided in Rule 56(b), M.R.Civ.P., the moving party may move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary judgment in his favor.

State v. Barbelais

101 Me. 512 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 1906

Jones v. Sanford, 66 Maine, 585. … And in Commonwealth v.

Cushman v. Holyoke

34 Me. 289 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

The logs, before they were removed from the bank, measured, according to the scale bills introduced at the trial, five hundred and fifty-one thousand one hundred feet, board measure. … Such was the case in Macomber v. Parker, 13 Pick. 175 , and Riddle v. Varnum, 20 Pick. 280 . It was undoubtedly competent for the parties to transfer the logs at one place and to determine the quantity at another.

Ellis v. Buzzell

60 Me. 209 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1872

See note (a) to Willmet v. Harmer, 8 Car. & P. 695, in E. C. L. R., vol. 34, p. 590, and the cases there cited. … Matthews v. Huntley, 9 N. H. 150, per Parker, C. J.; Folsom v. Brown, 5 Foster, 122 ; Kincade v.

Hall v. Barker

64 Me. 339 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1875

In Clendanil v. … In Cross v. Beard, 26 N.

Bolduc v. Watson

639 A.2d 629 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1994

See also Inniss v. Methot Buick-Opel, Inc., 506 A.2d 212, 218 (Me.1986); Blue Spruce Co. v. Parent, 365 A.2d 797, 802 (Me.1976). Cf. Desotell v. … Phillips v. Gregg, 628 A.2d 151, 152 (Me.1993); Canadian Nat’l Ry. v. Sprague, 609 A.2d 1175, 1179 (Me.1992). The entry is: Judgment affirmed. All concurring. 1 .

Lincoln v. Edgecomb

28 Me. 275 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1848

Brown v. Gay, 3 Greenl 126; Wyatt v. Savage, 2 Fairf. 429. This rule would not however become applicable, if the northerly line of lot No. 34 should be satisfactorily established by testimony.

Maine Energy Recovery Co. v. United Steel Structures, Inc.

1999 Me. 31 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 16, 1999

Brawn Co. v. … Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Me.1990) (quoting McCain Foods, Inc. v. St. Pierre, 463 A.2d 785, 788 (Me.1983)) (discussing j.n.o.v. motions). 4 .

Davis v. Secretary of State, Division of Motor Vehicles

577 A.2d 338 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 1990

Gulick v. Board of Environmental Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207 (Me.1982). This standard of review is identical to the “clear error” standard used to review a trial court’s factual findings. Id. at 1207-08 . … See also Beaulieu v.

Stevens v. Odlin

109 Me. 417 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 1912

Rogers v. White, 6 Maine, 1903; Hilton v. Hanson, 101 Maine, 21. Upon the first allegation of fraudulent representation in connection with Mr. … Brown v. Blunt, 72 Maine, 415. It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions, because the verdict is so manifestly wrong upon the evidence that the motion for a new trial must be granted. Motion sustained.

Elwell v. Elwell

32 Me. 337 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

We have already decided, (Motley v. Motley, 31 Maine, 490,) that the statute 4of 1849 does not repeal any part of the 89th chapter of the Revised Statutes. … It is provided in chapter 89, § 6, that “ a divorce from bed and board may be granted, for the cause of extreme cruelty; or whenever the husband shall grossly, or wantonly, and cruelly neglect or refuse to *339 provide suitable

White v. Estes

44 Me. 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

that Talentine Estes delivered himself into his custody, as jailer, November 24, 1854; and went into close confinement, and so remained in jail, till the 8th of December, 1854, when he was discharged for non-payment of his board … Rollins v. Dow, 24 Maine R., 124; Fales v. Goodhue, 25 Maine R., 425.