Case law

State v. Barrows

76 Me. 401 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 26, 1884

The Queen v. Thompson, L. R. 1 C. C. 378; The Queen v. Winsor, L. R. 1 Q. B. 390; The Queen v. Payne, L. R. 1 C. C. 349; The Queen v. Deeley, 11 Cox. C. C. 607. … Com. v. Brown, 130 Mass. 279 . If the argument for the defendant is sound, then the common law rule has become reversed.

Stevens v. Parsons

80 Me. 351 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1888

Little v. Rogers, 1 Met. 108 ; Masters v. Barretto, 8 C. B. 433; Brown v. De Winton, 6 C. B. 336 ; Gay v. Lander, 6 C. B. 336 ; Hooper v. Williams, 2 Ex. 13 ; Absalon v. Marks, 11 Q. B. 19. … Bigelow v. Colton, Clapp v. Rice , and Dubois v.

Madunkeunk Dam & Improvement Co. v. E. F. Allen Clothing Co.

102 Me. 257 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1906

Smith v. Kelley, 43 Mich. 390 ; Peterson v. Anderson, 44 Mich. 441 . … Improvement Co. v.

Inhabitants of Georgetown v. Hanscome

108 Me. 131 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1911

As was said in Grower v. … Ellsworth v. Brown, 53 Maine, 519; Farmingdale v. Berlin Mills Co., 93 Maine, 333.

Howe v. Saunders

38 Me. 350 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

Barrett v. Barrett, 8 Greenl. 353; Ware v. Webb, 32 Maine, 41; Austin v. Bostwich, 9 Conn. 496 ; Martin v. Williams, 17 Johns. 330 ; Newlin v. Duncan, 1 Harring. 204 ; Oliver v. Gray, 1 Har. & Gill. 264; Bell v. … C. 351; Lonsdale v. Brown, 3 Wash. C. C. 404 ; Ames v. LeRue, 2 McLean, 216 .

Furlong v. Polleys

30 Me. 491 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

. — The defendants made with the plaintiff, a contract of purchase of “ ten tons of merchantable meadow hay,” and of a “logging chance,” on township numbered nine, and gave their notes therefor, payable in boards. … Leigh v. Paterson, 8 Taunt. 540; Gainsford v. Carroll, 2 B. & C. 624; Boorman v. Nash, 9 B. & C. 145; Shepherd v. Hampton, 3 Wheat. 200 ; Day v. Dox, 9 Wend. 129 ; Davis v. Shields, 24 Wend. 322 ; Shaw v.

Estate of O'Connor

615 A.2d 1179 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 12, 1992

Browne v. Dubey, 251 A.2d 424, 425 (Me.1969) (citing Morrill v. Morrill, 116 Me. 154, 155 , 100 A. 756 (1917)). … Hamm v. Hamm, 584 A.2d 59, 62 (Me.1990).

Simpson v. Simpson

119 Me. 14 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1920

State v. Hill, 48 Maine, 24; Brown v. Moore, 79 Maine, 216. But our Law Court is not a court of common law jurisdiction, and therefore has no inherent power to grant new trials. … Referring to Holmes v. Holmes and Lord v.

Campbell v. Town of MacHias

661 A.2d 1133 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 19, 1995

In the seminal case, NLRB v. … until completion of the Board’s hearing. 437 U.S. at 236 , 98 S.Ct. at 2324 ...Similarly, in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v.

Saucier v. Portland

932 A.2d 1178 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 18, 2007

Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 651 A.2d 358, 360 (Me.1994). … Costales v. S.D. Warren Co., 2003 ME 115, ¶ 7 , 832 A.2d 790, 792 .

Watt v. Corey

76 Me. 87 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1884

White v. Carr, 71 Maine, 555. In Hewett v. … Stevens v. Fassett, supra; White v. Carr, supra.

Stewart v. Stewart

143 Me. 406 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 16, 1948

This principle was applied in the divorce field in Sweet v. Sweet, 119 Me. 81 ; 109 A. 379 ; Michels v. Michels, 120 Me. 395 ; 115 A. 161 ; 18 A. L. R. 570; Bond v. Bond, 127 Me. 117 ; 141 A. 833 ; and Alpert v. … Libelant’s allegation of her residence may be said to have the support of credible evidence in.proof that she was paying board at the place where she was living.

Wilson v. Condon

153 A.3d 98 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 2016

See Reardon v. Larkin, 2010 ME 86, ¶¶ 16-17 , 3 A.3d 376 ; Pelletier v. Fort Kent Golf Club, 662 A.2d 220, 224-25 (Me. 1995); Westlake v. Morton, 655 A.2d 334, 336 (Me. 1995); Stubbs v. … Brown, 288 A.2d 713, 715 (Me. 1972) (“The degree of credibility to which witnesses are entitled is for the jury and not the court to decide.”). [¶ 9] Wilson also contends, based on Questions 3 and 4 of the verdict form, 1

Town of Pownal v. Emerson

639 A.2d 619 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 25, 1994

Waterville Hotel Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 241 A.2d 50, 53 (Me.1968). … See Chandler v.

Dudley v. Wyler

647 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 25, 1994

See Niner v. … See Kleinschmidt v. Morrow, 642 A.2d 161, 165-66 (Me.1994); Bartner v.

State v. Dolan

69 Me. 573 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1879

State v. Gorham, 65 Maine, 273. State v. Wentworth, Id. 247. … In Com. v.

Express Scripts Inc. et al.

304 A.3d 239 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 2023

Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159, 169-70 (1983). … Dyer v.

Wells v. Northeastern Telephone Co.

101 Me. 371 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 9, 1906

(Derry v. Flitner, 118 Mass. 133 .) … Woodward v. Aborn, 35 Maine, 271; Smith v. Faxon, 156 Mass. 598 .

State v. Rees

748 A.2d 976 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2000

As the Supreme Court stated in Brown v. … This holding was limited in Brown v. Walker. See Brown, 161 U.S. at 608 , 16 S.Ct. 644 . . The underlying case arose before the Supreme Court’s opinion in Miranda v.

Hare v. McIntire

8 L.R.A. 450 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 1890

Dwelly v. Dwelly, 46 Maine, 377; Carle v. Bangor & Pisc. Canal R. R. Co., 43 Maine, 269. … And it has been directly adjudicated in Wright v. Roxburgh, 2 Ct. Sess. Cas. (3d series) 748; Hinds v. Harbou, 58 Ind. 121 ; Hinds v. Overacher, 66 Ind. 547 ; Griffiths v. Wolfram, 22 Minn. 185 ; and in Osborne v.