Case law

Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Searsport

438 A.2d 483 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 1981

Plaintiff, Delta Chemicals, appeals from an order of the Superior Court, Waldo County, affirming a decision of the Sears-port Board of Assessment Review which refused to grant an abatement of plaintiff’s property taxes. … Shawmut Inn v. Inhabitants of the Town of Kennebunkport, Me., 428 A.2d 384, 393 (1981); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Inhabitants of the City of Presque Isle, 150 Me. 181, 189 , 107 A.2d 475, 479 (1954).

Chapman v. Decrow

93 Me. 378 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1899

In State v. … Janson v. Brown, 1 Camp. 41. See also Wells v. Head, 4 Car. & P. 568.

Dorman v. City Council

81 Me. 411 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 19, 1889

In Preble v. … In Cassidy v.

State v. Boyington

56 Me. 512 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1869

that "in voting for representatives to the State Legislature, in the wards of a city, the names shall be on the same ballot with the other officers to be chosen at the meeting, by voters of like qualifications, unless the board … The rule as here stated is fully recog *515 nized in State v.

Sleeper

147 Me. 302 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 19, 1952

As we said in Bennett v. … Porter v. Ritch, supra.

Bennett v. Prawer

786 A.2d 605 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 2001

Anderson v. Elliott, 555 A.2d 1042, 1049 (Me.1989). Rule 9 is remedial in nature and, therefore, should be construed broadly. See Director of Bureau of Labor Standards v. … Board of Dirs. of Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 33 v. Teachers’ Ass’n of Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 33, 395 A.2d 461, 463 (Me.1978).

Davric Maine Corp. v. Bangor Historic Track, Inc.

751 A.2d 1024 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 2000

See Brown v. Maine State Employees Association, 690 A.2d 956, 958 (Me.1997). … See Brown v. State, 426 A.2d 880, 888 (Me.1981). The December 7th decision specifically notifies the parties that appeal to the Superior Court must be made within thirty days of the receipt of the decision.

Town of Steuben v. Lipski

602 A.2d 1171 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 13, 1992

Gulick v. Board of Envt’l Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207-08 (Me.1982). … Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Town of Searsport, 438 A.2d 483, 484 (Me.1981).

Ames v. Dipietro-Kay Corp.

617 A.2d 559 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1992

Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1215 (Me.1990) (quoting Pombriant v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Maine, 562 A.2d 656, 659 (Me.1989)). … Wing v. Morse, 300 A.2d 491, 495 (Me.1973) (quoting Johnson v. Dubois, 256 A.2d 733, 734 (Me.1969)).

Marble v. Snow

14 Me. 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1837

Yet it is said, in Brown v. Chase, 4 Mass. R. 436 , that “the Chief Justice ob *197 served, that he saw no sufficient reason why costs should not be given. … Rogers et al.; 5 Greenl. 19, Gibson v. Waterhouse; 5 Greenl. 74, Hathorne v. Cate.

Inhabitants of Smithfield v. Inhabitants of Waterville

64 Me. 412 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

In Lee v. Deerfield, 3 N. … Andover v. Grafton, 7 N. H., 315; Mason v. Bristol, 10 N. H., 36; Glidden v. Unity, 33 N. H., 577.

Forest City, Inc. v. Payson

239 A.2d 167 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1968

Toulouse et al. v. Board of Zoning Adjust., City of Waterville, 147 Me. 387, 393 , 87 A.2d 670, 673 . … In Hutzler v.

Ross v. Gould

5 Me. 204 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1828

Little v. Megquier 2, Greenl. 276. Robinson v. Swett & al. 3. Greenl. 316, and Proprietors of Kennebec Purchase v. Laboree 2. Greenl. 275, and the cases there cited. … A disseisin cannot be committed by mistake; Gay v. Brown 3.

Gashgai v. Maine Medical Association

350 A.2d 571 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 19, 1976

Attorney General and the Board of Environmental Protection v. R. D. Realty Cor poration, Me., 349 A.2d 201 (1975). … California State University, Hayward v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 47 Cal.App.3d 533 ; 121 Cal.Rptr. 85 (1975); Niner v. Hanson, 217 Md. 298 , 142 A.2d 798 (1958); Junkins v.

Marshall v. State

105 Me. 103 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 1909

A board of State assessors shall be chosen biennially by the legislature by joint ballot of the senators and represenatives in convention, consisting of three members .... who shall' *105 take and subscribe the oath provided … V, Part Third, Sect. 1Part Fourth, Sect. 1, and Art. IX, Sect. II.

Littlefield v. Inhabitants of Webster

90 Me. 213 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1897

It is alleged in the plaintiffs declaration that, at a point in the sidewalk about thirty-five feet north of Margaret Moody’s house and opposite Charles Meres, was a plank or board that had become rotten and incapable of … But as stated in the case of Hurley v.

Pope v. Cutler

22 Me. 105 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1842

While in the case of Blanchard v. … A’nd in the case of Berry v.

Calaska Partners, L.P. v. Dahl

676 A.2d 498 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 1996

It is well established that the attorney’s actions are to be regarded as the actions of the client, Moulton v. Brown, 627 A.2d 521, 523 (Me.1993); Mockus v. … Bank v. Brooks, 578 A.2d 1174, 1176 (Me.1990).

Turner v. Footman

71 Me. 218 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 29, 1880

It is substantially the same instruction which was given in Watson v. … Rogers v. Waite, 44 Maine, 276; Jewell v. Mahood, 44 N. H. 474; approved in Dingley v. Buffum, 57 Maine, 379; Brown v. Gordon, 1 Gray, 185 ; Esty v. Wilmot, 15 Gray, 168 ; Coleman v. N. Y. & N. H. R. R.

Snyder v. Talbot

589 A.2d 443 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1991

The Superior Court (Browne, A.R.J.) granted the motion to reopen. The motion to alter or amend or for relief from judgment was scheduled for hearing before the trial judge. … See Durgin v. Robertson, 428 A.2d 65, 65 (Me.1981). Both parties filed motions for reconsideration.