Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

1.00s

  • Champagne v. Fortin

    402 A.2d 471 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 13, 1979

    Bourgeois v. Sprague, Me., 358 A.2d 521, 522 (1976). … See Brown v. Strickland, 32 Me. 174 (1850). Appellees first cite 18 M.R.S.A. § 2206 (1964) in support of their argument of implication by necessity. 1 We do not see its relevance.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Berube v. Town of Sanford

    561 A.2d 1031 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 1989

    The Berubes’ complaint alleged the Sanford Board of Selectmen seized a portion of their property by eminent domain absent public exigency, in violation of article I, section 21 of the Maine Constitution. … See, e.g., Giberson v. Quinn, 445 A.2d 1007, 1010 (Me.1982). The entry is: Judgment affirmed. GLASSMAN and COLLINS, JJ. concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vachon v. Inhabitants of the Town of Lisbon

    295 A.2d 255 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 20, 1972

    Browne v. Bowdoinham (1880), 71 Me. 144 . … Hooper v. Cummings (1858), 45 Me. 359 ; Browne v. Bowdoinham, supra.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Marble v. Snow

    14 Me. 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1837

    Yet it is said, in Brown v. Chase, 4 Mass. R. 436 , that “the Chief Justice ob *197 served, that he saw no sufficient reason why costs should not be given. … Rogers et al.; 5 Greenl. 19, Gibson v. Waterhouse; 5 Greenl. 74, Hathorne v. Cate.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Searsport

    438 A.2d 483 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 1981

    Plaintiff, Delta Chemicals, appeals from an order of the Superior Court, Waldo County, affirming a decision of the Sears-port Board of Assessment Review which refused to grant an abatement of plaintiff’s property taxes. … Shawmut Inn v. Inhabitants of the Town of Kennebunkport, Me., 428 A.2d 384, 393 (1981); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Inhabitants of the City of Presque Isle, 150 Me. 181, 189 , 107 A.2d 475, 479 (1954).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Robert Charest v. Hydraulic Hose & Assemblies, LLC

    247 A.3d 709 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 2021

    Packgen, Inc. v. … See Urrutia v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Slade v. Slade

    58 Me. 157 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1870

    We do not perceive that the case of Sheaf v. Sheafe, 24 N. … Chase, 58 Maine, 258; Sturtevant v. Randall, 53 Maine, 149.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Stuart

    68 Me. 61 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 1878

    It appears that one James Houdlette, having a bill of lading of a quantity of hay shipped on board the bark Savannah for New Orleans, indorsed the same to the plaintiffs, who thus as between them and Houdlette acquired a … Winslow v. Norton, 29 Maine, 419. There is nothing in the evidence which discloses any right on the part of the defendants to contest the plaintiff’s title.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Scott

    343 A.2d 177 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 1975

    State v. Brown, Me., 302 A.2d 322, 324 (1973); State v. McKeough, Me., 300 A.2d 755 (1973). … In State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Reardon v. Department of Human Services

    822 A.2d 1120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 5, 2003

    In Maine Real Estate Commission v. … See, e.g., Ogunquit Sewer Dist. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kay H. Cox v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.

    59 A.3d 1280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 15, 2013

    Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 229 F.3d 56, 63 (1st Cir.2000) (applying Maine law); see Johnson v. Amica Mut. Ins. … On March 24, 1998, the Town of Ken-nebunkport Planning Board approved the condominium plan and a recorded plat of the condominium, as executed by the members of the Planning Board, was recorded on March 30, 1998 in the York

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Maine Industrial Services, Inc.

    645 A.2d 626 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1994

    See also Wilkes v. … Hall v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me.1985).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Boston Milk Producers Inc. v. Halperin

    446 A.2d 33 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 1982

    Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Freddie F. … In Morris v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Thurston v. Carter

    112 Me. 361 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1914

    See also Yates v. Higgins, L. R., 1 Q. B. D., 1896, 166; Harper v. Marcks, L. R., 1894, 2 Q. B. D., 319, 322, 323. … See Osborn v. Lennox, 2 Allen, 207 , 209; Brown v. Graham, 80 Neb., 281, 284 . Exceptions overruled.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Rand v. Michaud

    122 Me. 65 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1922

    Brown v. Blunt, 72 Maine, 415, 418. The defendant under the pleadings occupies the position of a plaintiff in an action for deceit. … Brown v. Blunt, 72 Maine, 415.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Cookson

    204 A.3d 125 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2019

    State v. … See Cooper v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Barrett v. Herbert Engineering, Inc.

    371 A.2d 633 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1977

    In Canning v. … See also Brown’s Case, 1924, 123 Me. 424 , 123 A. 421 , 60 A.L.R. 1293 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Whitten v. Greeley-Shaw

    520 A.2d 1307 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1987

    Co. v. Brown, 113 Me. 51 , 92 A. 993 (1915); Maine Mutual Ins. Co. v. Hodgkins, 66 Me. 109 (1876). … Zamore v. Whitten, 395 A.2d 435, 440 (Me.1978).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Doucette

    544 A.2d 1290 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1988

    State v. Drown, 447 A.2d 466, 471 (Me.1982). … State v. Howes, 432 A.2d 419, 423 (Me.1981).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Alley v. Caspari

    80 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1888

    Burrell v. Benjamin, 15 Mass. 354 ; Roberts v. Knights, 7 Allen, 449 ; Peabody v. Hamilton, 106 Mass. 217 . These cases cover the ground fully. … transitory nature might be maintained against a citizen of another state, oven if the plaintiff be an alien, if the defendant be personally served with process, either by summons or arrest, although the process be served on board

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.