Case law

Kay H. Cox v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.

59 A.3d 1280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 15, 2013

Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 229 F.3d 56, 63 (1st Cir.2000) (applying Maine law); see Johnson v. Amica Mut. Ins. … On March 24, 1998, the Town of Ken-nebunkport Planning Board approved the condominium plan and a recorded plat of the condominium, as executed by the members of the Planning Board, was recorded on March 30, 1998 in the York

James v. Wood

8 L.R.A. 448 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1889

Com. part V, c. 35, § 2; Blades v. Higgs, 11, H. L. 621. … Union State Co. v. Tilton, 69 Maine, 244; Adams v. McGlinchy, 66 Maine, 474; Craig v. Gilbreth, 47 Maine, 416; Brown v. Ware, 25 Maine, 411; Burke v. Savage, 13 Allen, 408 ; Magee v. Scott, 9 Cush. 148 ; Armory v.

Parsons v. Stevens

107 Me. 65 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 14, 1910

Pitman v. Thornton, 65 Maine, 96, 99; Clapp v. Thaxter, 7 Gray, 384 ; Brown v. Aspden, 14 How. 26 ; 2 Smith’s Chancery Practice, pages 5 et seq. … In Brown v. Aspden, 14 How. 26 , it was said "By the established rule of chancery practice a rehearing in the sense in which that term is used in proceedings in equity cannot be allowed after a decree is enrolled.”

State v. Hubbard

486 A.2d 161 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 15, 1985

See, e.g., State v. Hudson, 325 A.2d 56 (Me.1974); State v. Brown, 142 Me. 16 , 45 A.2d 442 (1946). … See State v. Engstrom, 453 A.2d 1170, 1173 (Me.1982). We conclude the presiding justice did not commit error. The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

Neil v. Ford

21 Me. 440 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1842

Granite Bank v. Treat, 6 Shepl. 340. … The same doctrine was again stated in the case of Slasson v. Brown, 20 Pick. 439 , by Mr. Justice Dewey in delivering the opinion of the Court.

Moore v. Maine Industrial Services, Inc.

645 A.2d 626 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1994

See also Wilkes v. … Hall v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me.1985).

State v. Thompson

958 A.2d 887 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 2008

v. … .”); Lewien v.

Gaetan H. Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLC

187 A.3d 10 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 14, 2018

Prosecuted or not, the fact remains that Twin Rivers would be forced to commit a federal crime if it complied with the directive of the Workers' Compensation Board. 11 See Skinner v. Ry. Labor Execs.' … We therefore address the Board's reasoning as described in the latter case.

State v. Doucette

544 A.2d 1290 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1988

State v. Drown, 447 A.2d 466, 471 (Me.1982). … State v. Howes, 432 A.2d 419, 423 (Me.1981).

City of Lewiston v. Lincoln Street Associates

573 A.2d 29 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 19, 1990

Webb appealed to the board of appeals, which affirmed the planning board’s decision. … Inc. v. The Bank Josephine, 558 S.W.2d 597, 598-99 (Ky.1977).

Bickford v. Aetna Insurance

101 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 5, 1906

Herrman v. Merchants Ins. Co., 81 N. Y. 184 ; Allen et al. v. St. Louis Ins. Co., 85 N. Y. 473 ; Rann et al. exrs. v. The Home Ins. Co., 59 N. Y. 387 ; Hoffman v. Aetna Fire Ins. Co., 32 N. Y. 405 ; 1 May on Ins., (3rd. … Day v. Mut. Ben. L. Ins. Co., 1 MacArthur (D. C.) 41; Hartford F. Ins. Co. v. Walsh, 54 Ill. 164 ; Withered v. Maine Ins. Co., 49 Maine, 200; Aurora F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Kranich, 36 Mich. 288 .

Sabattus School Committee v. Department of Education

644 A.2d 1380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 21, 1994

International Paper Co. v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 629 A.2d 597, 599 (Me.1993). I. … Gulick v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207-08 (Me.1982). Under this standard, a factual finding will be set aside as clearly erroneous only if there is no competent evidence in the record, to support it.

Sacknoff v. Sacknoff

131 Me. 280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 1932

Spiller v. Close, 110 Me., 302, 86 A., 173 ; Laughlin v. Eaton, 54 Me., 156; Ballard v. Russell, 33 Me., 196. … Morrison v. Brown, 84 Me., 82, 24 A., 672 ; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 70 Me., 383. “It relates to cases when, by the very assumption, the hunsband may be a party with the wife, or not, at her election.” Hobbs v.

Brooks v. Clifford

144 Me. 370 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1949

Rogers v. Brown, 134 Me. 88 ; 181 Atl. 667 . If the writ issues, the court at nisi prius has the jurisdiction to decide what should be done. R. S. (1944), Chap. 116, Sec. 14. … Tuttle v. Lang, supra; Comm. v. Dowdican’s Bail, 115 Mass. 133,136 ; People v. Court of Sessions, 141 N. Y., 288 ; 36 N. E. 386 ; 23 L. R. A. 856.

Wentworth v. Sebra

829 A.2d 520 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 2003

Brown v. Dickey, 106 Me. 97, 103 , 75 A. 382, 385 (1909). We must assume the parties understood the meaning of the technical terms employed. … .”); but see Higgins v.

Andrews v. Department of Environmental Protection

1998 Me. 198 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1998

See Bush v. … See, e.g., Bartlett v.

State v. Kovtuschenko

521 A.2d 718 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1987

See Townsend v. Dollison, 66 Ohio St.2d 225 , 421 N.E.2d 146 (1981); State v. Wenof, 102 N.J.Super. 370 , 246 A.2d 59 (1968). … Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314-15 , 70 S.Ct. 652, 657-658 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1949). See also Mennonite Board of Missions v.

Nichols v. Dunton

113 Me. 282 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1915

See also High’s Extraordinary Legal Remedies, Sec. 24; Wood on Mandamus, Page 19; extensive note to Dane v. Derby, (54 Maine, 95) found in 89 Am. Dec., 722 ; and extensive note to State v. Gardner, 98 Am. St. … Rep., 858 ; Dennett v. Acme Mfg. Co., 106 Maine, 476.

First National Bank v. Grant

71 Me. 374 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 1880

J., in Harrington v. Dorr, 3 Rob. 283 , "cannottherefore be presumed in law to have limited such time to that before its maturity.” The authorities are decisive on this question. … Story on Promissory Notes, § 194: Dunn v. Weston, 71 Maine, 270; Brown v. Mott, 7 Johns. 362 ; Sturtevant v. Ford, 4 M. & G. 101; Parr v. Jewell, 81 E. C. L. 684; Maitland v. Citizens’ National Bank, 40 Maryland, 540 .

Coombs v. Mason

97 Me. 270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1903

M., the plaintiff boarded an electric car in Bath for the purpose of going to his home. At the time the seats, aisle, front and rear platforms of the car were full of passengers. … Atwood v. Bangor, Orono & Old Town Railway Co., 91 Maine, 399. That the plaintiff’s negligence, if he was guilty of negligence, preceded and was independent of the negligence of the defendant cannot be questioned.