Case law

Bickford v. Aetna Insurance

101 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 5, 1906

Herrman v. Merchants Ins. Co., 81 N. Y. 184 ; Allen et al. v. St. Louis Ins. Co., 85 N. Y. 473 ; Rann et al. exrs. v. The Home Ins. Co., 59 N. Y. 387 ; Hoffman v. Aetna Fire Ins. Co., 32 N. Y. 405 ; 1 May on Ins., (3rd. … Day v. Mut. Ben. L. Ins. Co., 1 MacArthur (D. C.) 41; Hartford F. Ins. Co. v. Walsh, 54 Ill. 164 ; Withered v. Maine Ins. Co., 49 Maine, 200; Aurora F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Kranich, 36 Mich. 288 .

Howard v. Card

6 Me. 353 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1830

In Badlam v. … In the case of Swett & al. v.

State v. Hachey

278 A.2d 397 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1971

This issue clearly falls within the scope of Harris v. United States (1968) 390 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 . See also State v. Chapman (Me.1969) 250 A.2d 203 ; Commonwealth v. … Brown’s absence, treated Mr. Buzzell. from July 29 until his death on August 2. Dr. Holzwarth testified: “I think he died of infection.”

City of Calais v. Whidden

64 Me. 249 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

The defendant, who was then the city solicitor of the plaintiff’s and their representative in the legisla *253 ture, appeared before the auditing board to procure the allowance of the plaintiff’s claims. … Stetson v. Howe, 31 Maine, 353; Hall v. Marston, 17 Mass., 575 .

Moody v. Town of Wells

490 A.2d 1196 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 1985

, inter alia, that the board erred in its interpretation of section 11(D)(5) of the Wells Zoning Ordinance (merger of lots in common ownership). … Moody’s basic argument is that the proper interpretation of the merger provision is controlled by our decision in LaPointe v. City of Saco, 419 A.2d 1013 (Me.1980).

Dascomb v. Marston

80 Me. 223 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1888

Rogers v. Goore, 17 Ves. 130; Brown v. Ricketts, 2 Johns, ch. 425. So for questioning the sufficiency of a plea. Greene v. Harris, 9 R. I. 401. I. … Andrews v. Boyd, 5 Maine, 199 ; Butterfield v. Haskins, 33 Maine, 392 ; Earl v. Rowe, 35 Maine, 414; Stone v. Worth, 41 Maine, 265 ; Sampson v. Randall, 72 Maine, 109.

Veitkunas v. Morrison

114 Me. 256 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 14, 1915

“The test of repeal by implication,” said the court in Starbird v. … Seiders v. Creamer, 22 Maine, 558; In re Penobscot Lumbering Asso., 93 Maine, 391. The letter may be departed from in order to reach the spirit and intent of the act. Holmes v. Paris, 75 Maine, 559.

Corey v. Greene

51 Me. 114 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

Hartshorn v. Eames, 31 Maine, 93. This case, therefore, did not need to be " reconciled” with that of Webster v. Clark, previously cited, as was attempted in Dana v. Haskell, 41 Maine, 25. In Webster v. … Pritchard v. Brown, 4 N. H., 397. But we have derived our laws relating to this subject from Massachusetts; and the construction given to them by the courts of that State is entitled to great weight.

Gorham Savings Bank v. Baizley

704 A.2d 398 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 8, 1998

See Town of Orrington v. … Mmnelusa Co. v.

Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.

219 A.2d 542 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 11, 1966

Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 (1965); certiorari denied in Estwing Mfg. Co. v. Singer, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 . See also Van Wagenberg v. … International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct. 154 , 90 L.Ed. 95 ; McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. 220 , 78 S.Ct. 199 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 ; Hanson v.

TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Hawkins

5 A.3d 1042 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 19, 2010

Brown v. … Comm’n v.

Leighton v. S.D. Warren Co.

883 A.2d 906 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 20, 2005

Klimas, 582 A.2d at 259 (stating “Klimas need only prove that [the employer] had the contemporaneous notice required by Pottle.”)', Lister v. … Because we are directed by statute to refrain from reviewing factual findings of Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officers, 39-A M.R.S.A. §§ 318, 322(3) (2001), 4 we decline to do so.

Berry v. Billings

44 Me. 416 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

Inst., 6 and 7, 298, 299; Hargrave’s note, 33; Sumner v. Williams, 8 Mass. R., 174 ; 4 Kent’s Com., 468. … Cruise, 334, note; Kent v. Waite, 10 Pick. R., 141; Blake v. Clark, 6 Greenl., R. 436; Brown v. Thissell, 6 Cush. R., 257, cited by counsel in argument.

Stubbs v. Pratt

85 Me. 429 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 1893

Hatfield v. Workman, 35 W. Va. 538 , S. C. 14 S. E. Rep. 153; Buker v. Bowden, 83 Maine, 67. In Evans v. Miller, 58 Miss. 120 ( 38 Am. … Irving Browne. In Copeland v.

State v. Arnold

421 A.2d 932 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1980

As we said in State v. … State v. Stone, Me., 294 A.2d 683 (1972). See also United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); Frisbie, Warden v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519 , 72 S.Ct. 509 , 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952).

Pinkham v. Haynes

103 Me. 112 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 23, 1907

of the words " on or before,” this court has said; "within” a certain period "on or before” a day named, and "at or before” a certain day, are equivalent terms and the rules of construction apply alike to each,” Leader v. … See Frommel v. Foss, 102 Maine, 176. The entry must accordingly be, Judgment for defendants.

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

153 Me. 471 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 14, 1958

Kelley v. School District, 134 Me. 414 ; Hamilton v. Portland Pier Dist., 120 Me. 15 ; Kennebec Water Dist. v. Waterville, 96 Me. 234 . … Morris v. Goss, 147 *475 Me. 89, 94. As for home rule, municipal plebiscites fulfill such requirements.

State v. Tait

483 A.2d 745 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 9, 1984

The defendant, when later seen with Zaccadelli, was wearing jeans, boots, and either a plaid shirt without a jacket, or a brown leather jacket. … State v. Jackson, 331 A.2d 361, 365 (Me.1975); State v. LeClair, 425 A.2d 182, 184 (Me.1981).

Pamela A. Dobbins v. Mark J. Dobbins

234 A.3d 223 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 21, 2020

Black v. … Dobbins Donald Brown, Esq., Don Brown Law, Brewer, for appellee Pamela A. Dobbins Bangor District Court docket number FM-2006-416 FOR CLERK REFERENCE ONLY

MacCormick v. MacCormick

478 A.2d 678 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1984

People v. … Schlehlein v.