Case law

McInnis v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission

513 A.2d 857 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 1986

Nothing in the cases cited to us by Mclnnis, namely, Nisson v. Maine Employment Security Commission, 455 A.2d 945 (Me.1983), and Skeink v. … When, as here, the Superior Court acts as an appellate court reviewing an action of an administrative board, the Law Court directly examines the record developed before the board. Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v.

Bowers v. Barrett

85 Me. 382 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1893

But in Sprague v. … The principle involved in this decision was further developed and the correct rule formulated in the recent case of Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Maine, 450.

Neal v. Flint

88 Me. 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1895

Bonney v. Morrill, 57 Maine, 368, 373, and cases cited. See Grant v. Frost, 80 Maine, 202; Bradstreet v. Rich, 72 Maine, 233, 237, and cases cited. Brown on Parol Evidence, ch. xii, § 50, and cases cited. … Hulbert, 117 Mass. 151 ; Nickerson v. Saunders, 36 Maine, 413; Goodspeed v. Fuller, 46 Maine, 144; Bradstreet v. Rich, supra. In Dorr v.

Inman v. Willinski

144 Me. 116 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1949

Brown v. Rhoades, 126 Me. 186 ; 137 A. 58 ; 53 A. L. R. 834; Bank v. Kingsley, 84 Me. 111 at 113 ; 24 A. 794 . Bastardy proceedings are purely statutory and were unknown to the common law. Woodbury v. … This principal has been recognized by our court in Starbird v. Brown, 84 Me. 238 ; 24 A. 824 and Mace v. Cushman, 45 Me. 250 at 260 .

Smart v. Department of Public Safety

959 A.2d 756 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 20, 2008

Numerical Impairment Rating for a Mental Stress Injury [¶ 7] We noted in our recent decision in Harvey v. H.C. … See also 39-A M.R.S. § 201(3); Townsend v. Me. Bur. of Pub. Safety, 404 A.2d 1014, 1016-17 (Me.1979); Cote v. Osteopathic Hosp. of Me., Inc., 447 A.2d 75, 78 (Me.1982).

Pease v. Inhabitants of Parsonsfield

92 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 1898

Painter, 17 Conn. 585 , and cases cited; Smith v. State, 19 Conn. 493 . In Woodbury v. … See also Brown v. Lunt, 37 Maine, 423; Belfast v. Morrill, 65 Maine, 580. In Woods v. Bristol, 84 Maine, 358, there was an attempt to usurp an office, not to fill one under color of right. Bunker v.

Simpson v. Garland

72 Me. 40 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 18, 1881

In Nobleboro' v. … Sturdivant v. Hull, 59 Maine, 172; Atkins v. Brown, 59 Maine, 90; Sheridan v. Carpenter, 61 Maine, 83; Winship v. Smith, 61 Maine, 121; Ballou v. Talbot, 16 Mass. 461 ; Tucker Man’f’g Co. v.

Michael F. Bailey v. City of Lewiston

2017 ME 160 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 2017

Hird v. … See State v.

Leonard Advertising Co. v. Flagg

128 Me. 433 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 11, 1930

Corthell v. Holmes, 87 Me., 24. … Clark v. Pishon, 31 Me., 503; Brown v. Nourse, 55 Me., 230; Strang v. Hurst, 61 Me., 9; Bresnahan v. Soap Co., 108 Me., 128.

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

146 Me. 295 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 10, 1951

board and charged to the appropriate project or projects and the board shall keep proper records of accounts showing each amount so charged. … Upon the issuance of revenue bonds for any project or projects, the funds so expended by the board in connection with such project or projects shall be reimbursed to the board from the proceeds of such bonds. Sec. 225.

State of Maine v. Angelena Quirion

2025 ME 75 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 14, 2025

See Brown, 142 Me. at 18-22, 45 A.2d at 443-45; Bachelder, 403 A.2d at 759; State v. Linnell, 408 A.2d 693, 694-95 (Me. 1979); Edwards, 458 A.2d at 423-25. … See State v.

Weeks & Potter Co. v. Elliott

93 Me. 286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1899

Motley v. Sawyer, 34 Maine, 540; Webster v. Webster, 58 Maine, 139; Blake v. Blake, 64 Maine, 177. … Lane v. Lane, 76 Maine, 521; Blake v. Blake, supra. The wife’s administrator was allowed to recover against the husband’s executor, in Morrison v. Brown, 84 Maine, 82.

Cust v. University of Maine

766 A.2d 566 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 9, 2001

In Lamonica v. … The entry is: The decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board is vacated. Remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1 .

Claire Trott v. H.D. Goodall Hospital

66 A.3d 7 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 21, 2013

P. 32; see also Henry v. … Scott v.

Katherine Stovall v. New England Telephone Company

2025 ME 47 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2025

See Boober v. Great N. Paper Co., 398 A.2d 371, 375 n.10 (Me. 1979); Bradbury v. … See Downing v.

State v. Colby

756 A.2d 946 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 2000

Board; transportation. Every prisoner gainfully employed is liable for the cost of board in the jail, as fixed by the county commissioners. … The sheriff shall charge the prisoner’s account, if there is one, for board. * * * * 5. Disbursements.

State of Maine v. Jason J. Follette

2026 ME 7 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 2026

See United States v. … Brown, Esq. (orally), Don Brown Law, P.C., Brewer, for appellant Jason J. Follette Justine T. Barry, Asst. Dist. Atty. (orally), and Kirk Bloomer, Asst. Dist.

Wiswell v. Starr

50 Me. 381 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1862

Brown, that the bill be dismissed as to him. But the truth of the facts upon which the motion is predicated, is not sustained by any testimony whatsoever. … Upon this point we are referred to Spurr v. Scovill & al., 3 Cush., 578, as conclusive.

Langdon v. Pickering

19 Me. 214 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1841

This rule was received in the case of Bowes v. … This is the doctrine as established by the case of Brown v. Selwin, Cas. temp. Talbot, 240; and recognized in the case of Jackson v. Sill, 11 Johns. 201 ; where many of the previous cases are examined.

Sanborn v. Matthews

141 Me. 213 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 27, 1945

J., 29, Par. 37; Fuller v. Tabor, 39 Me., 519; Moulton v. Witherell, 52 Me., 237; *216 McPheters et al. v. … J., both supra; Hayden v. Bartlett, 35 Me., 203; Brown v. Haynes, 52 Me., 578; Wing v. Milliken, supra.