Case law

City of Bangor v. Beal

85 Me. 129 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 16, 1892

The city by an ordinance of its City Council passed March 13, 1883, placed the funds so received in the care and custody of a board of five men, styled "Trustees of the Iidi’sey Fund.” … See also case Ludwick v. Huntzinger, 5 Watts and Serg. 51, cited with approval in Eaton v. Boissonnault, 67 Maine, 540. But we only decide the single question imposed on us by the pleadings and evidence.

Town of Freeport v. Ocean Farms of Maine, Inc.

633 A.2d 396 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1993

Morris v. Resolution Trust Corp., 622 A.2d 708, 716 (Me.1993); see also Town of Freeport v. … The Superior Court affirmed the decision of the Board and awarded attorney fees to the town.

Davis v. Nash

32 Me. 411 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1851

The fence, which was taken down, was erected by the direction of the plaintiff, and a portion of the boards was purchased by him. … In the case of Starr v.

Merrow v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission

495 A.2d 1197 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1985

Paige v. Maine Employment Security Commission, 391 A.2d 321, 325 (Me.1978); Therrien v. Maine Employment Security Commission, 370 A.2d 1385, 1390 (Me.1977). … The record discloses that the Plaintiff had extensive experience operating boarding homes. 2 .

Fournier v. Department of Corrections

983 A.2d 403 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 2009

Corp. v. Bangor Historic Track, Inc., 2000 ME 102, ¶ 11 , 751 A.2d 1024, 1029-30 . This time limit must be applied uniformly and consistently to parties represented by counsel and self-represented parties alike. … See Brown v.

Plummer v. Walker

24 Me. 14 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1844

The case of Arnold v. Arnold, 17 Pick. 4 , affords a full elucidation of the doctrine relied upon by the plaintiff in this case, and contended against by the counsel for the defendant. … Dewey v. Brown, 2 Pick. 387 .

Maine AFL-CIO Housing Development Corp. v. Town of Madawaska

523 A.2d 581 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1987

In Green Acre Baha’i Institute v. … See, e.g., Yorgason v. County Board of Equalization of Salt Lake County, 714 P.2d 653 (Utah 1986); see also Senior Citizens Housing Development Corporation of Claremont v.

Inhabitants of Rangeley v. Snowman

115 Me. 412 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1910

Dingley v. … Salley v. Robinson, 96 Maine, 474.

Perry v. Curtis

148 Me. 438 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1953

Wolf v. W. S. Jordan Co., 146 Me. 374 , 82 Atl. (2nd) 93; Levesque v. Pelletier, 144 Me. 245 , 68 Atl. (2nd) 9. … Adams v. Ketchum, 129 Me. 212 , 151 Atl. 146 ; Young v. Witham, 75 Me. 536 . See also opinion by Justice Merrill in Sears, Roebuck v.

Davric Maine Corp. v. Maine Department of Transportation

606 A.2d 201 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 14, 1992

Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 595 A.2d 438, 442 (Me.1991). … Senty v. Board of Osteopathic Examination & Regulation, 594 A.2d 1068, 1072 (Me.1991).

Carle v. Ladd

111 Me. 422 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 26, 1914

Carle for boarding the men. It is not contended, as we understand, and there would be no merit in such contention, that Mrs. … Haggett v. Hurley, 91 Maine, 542. The only ground on which the defendant’s liability in these actions is predicated is the theory that Mrs.

State v. Steeves

115 Me. 220 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 1916

It was so held in State v. Hill, 48 Maine, 241; and also in State v. Gilman, 70 Maine, 329, 334. See also State v. Read, 62 Maine, 134, 135, 136; State v. Smith, 54 Maine, 33, 36 and Brown v. … In State v.

Hebert v. Portland Railroad

103 Me. 315 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1907

Doyle v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 162 Mass. 66 ; Same v. Same, 166 Mass. 492 ; Dickinson v. West End St. Ry. Co., 177 Mass. 365 ; L. & N. M. M. Co. v. Weaver, 22 Ky. L. Rep. 30, 50 L. R. A. 381; Gillenwater v. M. & T. R. R. … Ware v. Gay, 11 Pick. 106 ; Clark v. C. B. & Q. R. R. Co., 15 Fed. 588 ; Lavis v. Wisconsin Cent. R. R. Co., 54 Ill. App. 636 ; Breese v. Trenton R. R. Co., 52 N. J. L. 250; Gulf C. & S. F. R. R. Co. v.

Munsey v. Hanly

102 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1907

Ames v. Hilton, 70 Maine, 36; 12 Eng. & Am. Enc., 19; 28 Eng. & Am. Enc., 610. The gist of the action of trespass quare clausum is the disturbance of the possession. Brown v. Manter, 22 N. H. 468; 4 Kent Com. 120; 3 Bl. … Stevens v. Stevens, 96 Ga. 374 ; Frisbee v. *425 Marshall, 122 N. Car. 760.

Dunson v. South Portland Housing Authority

814 A.2d 972 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 2003

See Cust v. Univ. of Maine, 2001 ME 29, ¶ 10 , 766 A.2d 566, 568-69 . [¶ 7] Section 201(6) was enacted in response to our decision in Ray v. … See Johnson v. S.D. Warren, Div. of Scott Paper Co., 432 A.2d 431, 435 (Me.1981); Kidder v. Coastal Constr.

Davey v. Lincoln County

505 A.2d 818 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 28, 1986

Stone v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 503 A.2d 222, 227 (Me.1986); Concord General Mutual Insurance Co. v. Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance Co., 411 A.2d 1017, 1020 (Me.1980). … Stone v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 503 A.2d 222 , 227 n. 10 (Me.1986). . P.L.1975, ch. 622, § 51 substituted the term “average final compensation” for the word "pay." .

Abbott v. Chase

75 Me. 83 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 6, 1883

Page v. McGlinch, 63 Maine, 472, 475; Brown v. Nourse, 55 Maine, 230; Clark v. Pishon, 31 Maine, 503. … Woodside v. Wagg, 71 Maine, 207; Greene v. Walker, 63 Maine, 312, 313; Brown v. Lunt, 37 Maine, 423; Nason v. Dillingham, 15 Mass. 171; Bucknam v. Ruggles, id. 180 .

Bok v. Northeast Health

599 A.2d 815 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 16, 1991

board of incorporators for the parent and to provide more control over and integration of the subsidiaries’ boards of trustees. … See Luce Co. v. Hoefler, 464 A.2d 213, 215 (Me.1983).

Frothingham v. Mckusick

24 Me. 403 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1844

And, as the -law is settled in this State, (Smith v. Goodwin, 2 Greenl. 173) whoever cut and carried it way, without authority from them, was a trespasser; and could thereby acquire no property in it. … The defendant, as he proved by his witness, Royal McKusick, and, as he admitted, sawed and manufactured into boards six hundred and fifty thousand feet of the timber.

New England Trust Co. v. Penobscot Chemical Fibre Co.

142 Me. 286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1946

between the company and its stockholders, Spear v. … Spear v. Rockland-Rockport Lime Co., supra.