Case law

Esty v. Baker

48 Me. 495 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1860

Anderson v. Nesmith, 7 N. H., 167. If the close is “illegally entered, a cause of action at once accrues. Whatever is done after the breaking and entering is but an aggravation.” Brown v. Menter, 2 Foster, 468 . … Forbush v. Lombard, 13 Met., 109 ; Moore v.

Phinney v. Holt

50 Me. 570 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1862

Brown, 3 Watts and Serg., 395, because the papers were in the hands of a person who could not be reached by process of Court; same in Brown v. Wood, 19 Miss., 475 ; Bridge Co. v. Shannon, 1 Gilman, 15 ; Lemon v. … Blanchard v. Young, 11 Cush., 341 ; Pierce v. Gray, 7 Gray, 67 .

Moscone v. Andrews

600 A.2d 107 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 1991

In conformance with that settlement agreement, the Superi- or Court (Penobscot County, Browne, A.R.J.) entered summary judgment for defendants Philip R. Andrews, John M. … Defendants sought to enforce the settlement agreement by filing a counterclaim in the pending action, a manner of proceeding approved in Phillips v. Fuller, 541 A.2d 629 , 629 n. 1 (Me.1988).

State v. Russo

260 A.2d 140 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1969

Mempa v. Rhay, 1967, 389 U.S. 128 , 88 S.Ct. 254 , 19 L.Ed.2d 336 ), it is generally held that constitutional requirements have no application. State v. Oliver (Me.1968) 247 A.2d 122 ; Escoe v. … People v. Rudnik (1952) 333 Mich. 216 , 52 N.W.2d 671 ; Arney v. State (1953) 195 Tenn. 57 , *142 256 S.W.2d 706 ; State v. Edelblute (1967) 91 Idaho 469 , 424 P.2d 739 ; State ex rel. Halverson v.

Penney v. Earle

87 Me. 167 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 17, 1895

Lawry v. Ellis. 85 Maine, 500. There may be exceptions, as in Phillips v. Brown, 74 Maine, 549. There a barn was sold during "an inclement season of the year.” This sale was in June.

Grant v. Elliot & Kittery Mutual Fire Insurance

76 Me. 514 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1884

The counsel' for the defense learnedly and’ elaborately argues the point in this case that was determined im Grant v. Insurance Co. 75 Maine, 196. … See Brown v. Haynes, 52 Maine, 578. Although the damages recovered may be more than we should have estimated them, we think the verdict should not be disturbed on that account. Exceptions and motion overruled.

Goddard v. Mitchell

17 Me. 366 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1840

The case, so far as this principle is involved, bears a near resemblance to that of Charles & al. v. Dana, 14 Maine R. 383, to which we refer. … Brown v. Gammon, 14 Maine R. 276. To justify the remedy by assumpsit, the least that could be required, would be clear and unequivocal proof, that the defendant had rescinded the contract, when the action was brought.

Heather J. Thumith v. Kenneth D. Thumith

70 A.3d 1232 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 16, 2013

Chamberlin, 2001 ME 167, ¶ 4, 785 A.2d 1247, and its underlying factual findings for clear error, Brown v. … See Douglas v.

Frothingham v. Maxim

127 Me. 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 14, 1928

Hoxie v. Weston, 19 Maine, 322, 329; County of Washington v. Brown, 33 Maine, 442; Packard v. Brewster, 59 Maine, 404; Farmington v. Hohert, 74 Maine, 416; Carleton v. Bird, 94 Maine, 182. … Sibley v. Brown, 15 Maine, 185; Gower v. Emery, 18 Maine, 79; Lothrop v. Arnold, 25 Maine, 136.

Maine State Employees Ass'n, SEIU Local 1989 v. Bureau of Employee Relations

652 A.2d 654 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 19, 1995

V, § V-l. … Lane v. Board of Directors, Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 8, 447 A.2d 806, 809-10 (Me.1982). “This rule ... is not based upon contract law ...

Mosher v. Berry

30 Me. 83 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

Davis v. Rainsford, 17 Mass. 210 ; Bancroft v. Makepeace, 12 Mass. 469; Wyatt v. Savage, 11 Maine, 429; Loring v. Norton, 8 Maine, 61; Emerson v. Tarbox, 9 Maine, 42; Moody v. Nichols, 16 Maine, 25; Rust v. … Boston Mill Corporation, 6 Pick. 158 ; Proprietors of Kennebec Purchase v. Tiffany, 1 Maine, 219; Brown v. Gay, 3 Maine, 126; Clark v. Wethy, 19 Wend. 320 .

Harrington v. Town of Kennebunk

496 A.2d 309 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 1, 1985

The facts surrounding this controversy are fully set forth in our opinion on the Plaintiffs’ first appeal of this case, Harrington v. Inhabitants of Town of Kennebunk, 459 A.2d 557 (Me.1983). … Ricci v. Superintendent, Bureau of Banking, 485 A.2d 645, 647 (Me.1984).

Green Acre Baha'i Institute v. Town of Eliot

159 Me. 395 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 4, 1963

Persons who require board and lodgingpay for those services, but are required to participate in the classes and lectures. … In Camp Emoh Associates v.

Thurlow v. Perry

107 Me. 127 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 1910

O’Donnell v. Leeman, 43 Maine, 158 ; Williams v. Robinson, 73 Maine, 186 ; Kingsley v. Siebreckt, 92 Maine, 25. … Browne on Statute of Frauds, secs. 376-381. Judgment for defendant.

Odell v. Dunn

591 A.2d 465 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 4, 1991

See Paradis v. Webber Hosp., 409 A.2d 672, 675 (Me.1979). … See Brown v. Corriveau, 576 A.2d 200 (Me.1990). Beyond that, he is not involved in the conclusion of this disclosure proceeding. The entry is: Judgment affirmed. All concurring.

Small v. Rose

97 Me. 286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 29, 1903

Taylor v. Witham, 3 Ch. D. 605; 1 Greenl. … Ro se v. Bryant, 2 Camp. 321; Wood on Limitations, § 115; 1 Greenl. Evidence, § 149; Libby v. Brown, 78 Maine, 492. Exceptions sustained.

State v. Preston

411 A.2d 402 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1980

. *407 In Orozco , defendant was questioned by the police in his boarding house bedroom at four o’clock in the morning. … See also, concurring opinion of White, J., and opinion of Powell, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, in Brown v.

Tolman v. Ward

86 Me. 303 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1894

In Smith v. … And in Gibson v.

Edgecomb v. Town of Limestone

538 A.2d 767 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 8, 1988

No. 5 v. M.S.A.D. No. 5 Teach. … McNally v. Mokarzel, 386 A.2d 744 (Me.1978).

Bates Street Shirt Co. v. Waite

130 Me. 352 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 15, 1931

National Bank v. Wade, 84 Fed., 10 ; Ventress v. Wallace (Miss.), 71 So., 636 ; Notes, 1917A L. R. A., 980. … Kidd v. Traction Co., 74 N. H., 178.