Case law

Mann v. Sumner

121 Me. 360 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1922

McLaughlin v. Randall, 66 Maine, 226, Jewell v. Harding, 72 Maine, 124, Brown v. Dicky, 106 Maine, 97. The deed was admitted, however, for the purpose of showing color of title in the defendant.

State v. Crowell

25 Me. 171 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1845

Rex v. Smith, 3 Bur. 1475 . The Apothecaries v. … This board are not required to keep a record of their proceedings; the license itself, signed by the members of the board, is the evidence of qualification, and is delivered to the person licensed.

Wass v. Maine Mutual Marine Insurance

61 Me. 537 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

Hopkins for insurance on a cargo of hay, shipped on board schooner Julia, from Dover, N. B., to Boston. … Loss payable to V. D. Wass. Under deck, $800 at li per cent, $4.50. On deck, $300 at 5 per cent, $15.00. GeoRge A. HopiciNS, agent.

Ross v. Hanson

227 A.2d 606 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 29, 1967

In Nichols v. … In Taft v.

Mitchell

133 Me. 81 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 1934

Gerrish v. Nason, 22 Me., 438; Robinson v. Adams, 62 Me., 369; Thomson, Aplt., 92 Me., 563, 43 A., 511 ; American Board of Commissioners, etc., Aplts., 102 Me.,72, 66 A., 215 . … Needham Trust Co. v. Cookson, 251 Mass., 160 ; American Board of Commissioners, etc., Aplts., supra.

Ashley L. Whitmore v. Nicholas A. Whitmore

288 A.3d 799 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 10, 2023

See Ehret v. … “We review factual findings regarding a party’s income for clear error,” Brown v. Brown, 2007 ME 89, ¶ 11, 929 A.2d 476, and we review an award of child support for an abuse of discretion, Dube v.

Appletree Cottage, LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

169 A.3d 396 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 2017

Assocs. v. Town of Wells, 2001 ME 178, ¶ 13 , 787 A.2d 137 (quotation marks omitted). *399 [¶ 10] Here, in granting Bond’s application for a building permit, the CEO made no factual findings. … Similar to the circumstances before us in Mills v.

Begin v. Town of Sabattus

531 A.2d 1261 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1987

In such circumstances, the Board’s rejection of the revised map presents no issue suitable for judicial review. See Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland, 505 A.2d 488 (Me.1986). … The function of the Planning Board is confined to the approval of park design as a preliminary step to the issuance of a construction permit by the Board of Selectmen.

Angell Family 2012 Prouts Neck Trusts v. Town of Scarborough Kenyon C. Bolton III v. Town of Scarborough

2016 ME 152 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 13, 2016

v. … Light Co. v.

Very v. McHenry

29 Me. 206 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1848

Brown, 5 East, 124, Lord Ellenborough says, “ the rule was well laid down by Lord Mansfield in Ballantine v. … Russell, 13 Mass. 1 ; Hunter v. Potts, 4 T. R. 182; Smith v. Buchanan, 1 East, 6; Sturgis v. Crowinshield, 4 Wheat. 122; McMillan v. McNiel, ibid. 209 ; Le Roy v. Crowninshield, 2 Mason, 152 , 161, 162; Phillips v.

Webster v. Bath Iron Works

1998 Me. 222 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 2, 1998

See Parker v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 644 A.2d 1037, 1039-10 (Me.1994). … See e.g., LaPointe v. United Eng’rs & Constructors, 680 A.2d 458, 460 (Me., 1996) (Offset for duplicative state recoveries); Webber v.

Nichols v. S.D. Warren/Sappi

928 A.2d 732 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 2007

Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc., 678 A.2d 583, 588 (Me.1996). [¶ 10] We first examine the plain language of the statute. … The entry is: The judgment of the hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board is affirmed.

State v. Lane

649 A.2d 1112 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 1994

State v. Munsey, 152 Me. 198 , 127 A.2d 79, 81-82 (1956); State v. … State v.

Bushey v. S.D. Warren Co.

642 A.2d 1352 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1994

Rudolph Carroll v. Celsius Contractors, 637 A.2d 111, 112 (Me.1994), (quoting Ladner v. … Because the Board issued inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law in response to S.D. Warren’s motion, we vacate the decision and remand for further proceedings. Gallant v.

Conley v. Inhabitants of Woodville

97 Me. 240 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1903

Warren v. Islesborough, 20 Maine, 442; Boothby v. Troy, 48 Maine, 560. … In this case the plaintiffs, living in the town of Lincoln, sue the inhabitants of the town of Woodville, for the board of a person having her pauper settlement in the latter town, which board was furnished in .the town where

Farrand v. Redington Memorial Home

270 A.2d 871 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 18, 1970

Monk v. Morton, 139 Me. 291 , 30 A.2d 17 (1943). … Smith, Adm’r v. The Eliza Jennings Home, 176 Ohio St. 351 , 199 N.E.2d 733 (1964); First *874 National Bank of Lawrence v. Methodist Home, 181 Kan. 100 , 309 P.2d 389 (1957); Brydges v.

In re Knox County Electric Co.

119 Me. 179 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 10, 1920

Small v. Danville, 51 Maine, 359; Goddard v. Harpswell, 84 Maine, 499; Woodcock v. Calais, 66 Maine, 234. … Arlington Board of Survey v. Bay State Street Ry., 224 Mass., 463, 469 . The principle seems to be no longer debatable. Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., U. S. Sup. Ct., June 9, 1919. 250 U. S., 394 ; Law. Ed.

State v. Poulin

105 Me. 224 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1909

It will *235 be observed that Brown v. … Now Chief Justice Butler in discussing Brown v.

Horn v. Town of Boothbay

672 A.2d 1105 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1996

Pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 80B, Horn sought judicial review of the Board’s decision. … When, as here, the Superior Court acts as an intermediate appellate tribunal, we review directly the decision of the Board. Roberts v. Town of Phippsburg, 642 A.2d 155, 156 (Me.1994) (citing WLH Management Corp. v.

McCaffrey v. Silk

150 Me. 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1954

Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R.R., 111 Me. 263 , 88 A. 988 (1913); Glazier v. Tetrault, 148 Me. 127 , 90 A. (2nd) 809 (1952). … :Graham, referring to the plan that is on the board, .with the pressure reducing valve here and the relief valve, here as indicated, was there ány protection to excessive heating for this boiler? A.