Case law

Lovell v. One Bancorp

614 A.2d 56 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 1992

York v. … In Jameson v.

Ashley L. Whitmore v. Nicholas A. Whitmore

288 A.3d 799 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 10, 2023

See Ehret v. … “We review factual findings regarding a party’s income for clear error,” Brown v. Brown, 2007 ME 89, ¶ 11, 929 A.2d 476, and we review an award of child support for an abuse of discretion, Dube v.

Richert v. City of South Portland

740 A.2d 1000 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 3, 1999

Juliano v. Town of Poland, 1999 ME 42, ¶ 5 , 725 A.2d 545, 547 (quoting Driscoll v. … Redevelopment Auth. of Allegheny County v.

Hilborn v. Bucknam

78 Me. 482 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 9, 1886

Harmon v. Harmon, 61 Maine, 227; Higgins v. Brown, 78 Maine, 473 (New England Reporter, Aug. 17, 1886). Motion sustained. Verdict set aside. JSTew0 trial granted. Peters, C.

Petit v. Key Bancshares of Maine, Inc.

635 A.2d 956 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1993

Id.; see also Brown v. … Moulton v. Brown, 627 A.2d 521, 523 (Me.1993).

Littlefield v. Eaton

74 Me. 516 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 10, 1883

Scott v. Hancock, 13 Mass. 162 ; Brown v. Anderson, 13 Mass. 201 ; Thompson v. Brown, 16 Mass. 172 ; Emerson v. Thompson, 16 Mass. 429 ; Heard v. Meader, 1 Maine, 156; Manson v. Gardiner, 5 Maine, 108, 115; Parkman v. … Riker v. Morse, 104 Mass. 277 ; Tarbell v.

Appletree Cottage, LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

169 A.3d 396 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 2017

Assocs. v. Town of Wells, 2001 ME 178, ¶ 13 , 787 A.2d 137 (quotation marks omitted). *399 [¶ 10] Here, in granting Bond’s application for a building permit, the CEO made no factual findings. … Similar to the circumstances before us in Mills v.

Franklin Wharf Co. v. City of Portland

46 Me. 42 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

Bangor House v. Brown, 33 Maine, 314.

Town of York v. Cragin

541 A.2d 932 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 1988

Such an interpretation is contrary to the plain language of the statute and to our decisions in Town of Arundel v. Swain, 374 A.2d 317 (Me.1977) and Planning Bd. of the Town of Naples v. Michaud, 444 A.2d 40 (Me.1982). … Cragin appealed the denial to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Board has not acted upon the appeal pending the outcome of this litigation. . An additional defendant was named in the complaint.

Lemaire v. Crockett

116 Me. 263 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 1917

Commonwealth v. Plaisted, 148 Mass., 375 -386. … People v. Johnson, 34 Col. 143 . *267 It is true, as was said in Andrews v.

Hascall v. Whitmore

19 Me. 102 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1841

Whitaker v. Brown, 8 Wend. 490 . He could have collected it, for the want of consideration could not be set up against him. A knowledge of the fdcts acquired afterward would not affect his rights. … In Smith v. Hiscock, 14 Maine R. 449, where a negotiable promissory note had been indorsed bona fide and for value before it was payable, the C.

Burton v. Mayo

106 Me. 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 2, 1909

by no more than one-fourth of an inch that board must be scaled as of the next lesser specified length. … The case of Chase v. Bradley, 17 Maine, 89, cited by the defendant, is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar.

Appletree Cottage, LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

169 A.3d 396 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 2017

Assocs. v. Town of Wells, 2001 ME 178, ¶ 13 , 787 A.2d 137 (quotation marks omitted). *399 [¶ 10] Here, in granting Bond’s application for a building permit, the CEO made no factual findings. … Similar to the circumstances before us in Mills v.

State v. Sterling

685 A.2d 432 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 21, 1996

State v. O’Connor, 681 A.2d 475, 476 (Me.1996). The Double Jeopardy Clauses of the federal and Maine constitutions are coextensive, State v. … State v. Sarvard, 659 A.2d 1265, 1266 (Me.1995) (citing United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 440 , 109 S.Ct. 1892, 1897 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989)).

Tiedemann v. Town of Limington

517 A.2d 322 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 1986

See Bacon v. Penney, 418 A.2d 1136, 1139 (Me.1980). In Cole v. … See Cole v. Peterson Realty, Inc., 432 A.2d at 755-56 .

Dunton v. Parker

97 Me. 461 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 27, 1903

See Storer v. Freeman, 6 Mass. 435 . … Sawyer v. Beal, ante, p. 356.

Mullen v. Lewiston Evening Journal

147 Me. 286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1952

The decision of this court in Brown v. Guy Gannett Publishing Co., 147 Me. 3 , 82 A. (2nd) 797, is entirely controlling of the instant case. … Newspapers are not entitled, in commenting upon court proceedings, to publish false statements with complete lack of good faith, and with motives of personal malice, and on the record, the principle declared in Brown v.

City of Augusta v. Augusta Water District

101 Me. 148 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 1906

In Camden v. … So in Mayo v.

Jones v. City of Portland

113 Me. 123 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 27, 1915

The principles of law relied upon by the plaintiffs were considered by the court in Laughlin v. … The reasons urged in this case, in support of the bill, were fully considered by the court in Laughlin v.

Phillips v. Phillips

40 Me. 160 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1885

Brown v. Veazie, 25 Maine, 359. In this case, Whitman, C.