Case law

Knight v. Burnham

90 Me. 294 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 27, 1897

Plaintiff claims to recover the price of boards sold by him to defendant by the thousand feet. Defense that the boards were not surveyed by a sworn surveyor, before delivery as *295 required by R. S., c. 41, § 15. … Richmond v. Foss, 77 Maine, 590. Plaintiff replies that he surveyed the boards, and that he was a legal surveyor of lumber.

J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. Stahl

117 Me. 190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1918

People’s National Bank v. Nickerson, 108 Maine, 341; Austin v. Baker, 112 Maine, 267. For this reason we should be amply justified in overruling the exceptions. … Co. v. Hodgkins, 66 Maine, 109. When a person signs a written contract he is presumed, by the ordinary rales of law, to know its contents, whether read or not. Great Northern Mfg. Co. v. Brown, 113 Maine, 51.

Stratton v. Bailey

80 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1888

True the father paid nothing for his board, and that may have been furnished by the husband. But providing the board is not a provision of the labor. … Colby v. Lamson, 39 Maine, 119 ; Oxnard v. Swanton, Id. 125. By R.

Thompson v. Consolidated Constructors

677 A.2d 554 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1996

We conclude that the Board, pursuant to Beaulieu v. … Gurney v. Commercial Welding Co., Me. W.C.C.App.Div. 733, 735 (Me.1992); Milles v. Carl Thompson, Jr., Me. W.C.C.App.Div. 4152, 4155-56 (Me.1990). See also Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr.

Hanson v. European & North American Railway Co.

62 Me. 84 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

Bryant v. Rich, 106 Mass., 180 , where the case of Goddard v. Grand Trunk Railway Company, 57 Maine, 202, is cited, and the carrier’s liability, as there declared, approved. … Rogers v. Waite, 44 Maine, 275; Brown v. Gordon, 1 Gray, 182 ; Com. v. Clark, 2 Met. 23 ; 2 Greenl.

Coombs v. Hogan

116 Me. 437 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 20, 1917

This is an action of assumpsit for board and lodging furnished Hannah B. Hogan, deceased. It is before the court on a general motion to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Mrs. … Leighton v. Nash, 111 Maine, 525.

Richardson v. Maine Employment Security Commission

229 A.2d 326 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 1967

Category B: Ball Brothers Company, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division (1963), 135 Ind.App. 68 , 189 N.E.2d 429 , no compensation. Fahl et al. v. … Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation (June 1965), 2 Ohio App.2d 286 , 207 N. E.2d 774 , remanded to the Board of Review due to insufficiency of the record. Marcum v. Ohio Match Co. et al.

Nutter v. Bailey

32 Me. 504 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1851

This suit appears to have been commenced to recover the value of boards sold and delivered by the intestate to the defendant. … Whitman v. Freeze, 23 Maine, 185. The testimony of Samuel Ames was legally admissible to prove the acts of the defendant, and that a survey was made by his direction.

Garing v. Fraser

76 Me. 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 23, 1884

Dunlap v. Glidden, 31 Maine, 435, 439; Severance v. Judkins, 73 Maine, 379 ; Damport v. Sympson, Cro. Eliz. 520; Eyres v. Sedgwicke, Cro. Jac. 601; Phelps v. Stearns, 4 Gray, 106 ; Rice v. … Parker v. Huntington, 2 Gray, 128 ; Brown v. Lakeman, 12 Cush. 482 and cases there cited; Parker v. Farley, 10 Cush. 279 . And even if we adopt the suggestions as to the inflexibility of the rule of Ch. Jus.

Cottle Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Farmington

693 A.2d 330 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 5, 1997

According to the Town’s sewer ordinance, such permits may be obtained only by applying to the Sewer Commission, comprised of the Board of Selectmen. [¶4] In March, the Planning Board approved Cottle’s project unanimously, … Smoke Rise, Inc. v.

Eaton v. Waite

66 Me. 221 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 11, 1877

Leavitt v. Savage, 16 Maine, 72, 73. Page v. Webster, 15 Maine, 249, 256. Frye v. Barker, 4 Pick. 382 . Halsted v. Brown, 17 Ind. 202 .

Campbell v. Eveleth

83 Me. 50 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 3, 1890

Hull v. Hall, 78 Maine, 114. … Kane v. Northern Centr. R. R. Co. 128 U. S. 91 . Guthrie v. Me. Centr. R. R. Co, 81 Maine, 572.

Town of Vienna v. Kokernak

612 A.2d 870 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 28, 1992

See Marxsen v. Board of Directors, Maine School Admin. Dist. No. 5, 591 A.2d 867, 872 (Me.1991). … See Fichter v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 604 A.2d 433, 437 (Me.1992). In the instant case the procedure that was used allowed both parties to present their positions.

State v. Cook

2 A.3d 333 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 24, 2010

State v. Cook, 2010 ME 81, ¶ 2 , 2 A.3d 313, 314 ; accord State v. Schmidt, 2008 ME 151, ¶2 , 957 A.2d 80, 83 . … See State v.

Phillips v. Sherman

61 Me. 548 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

Tucker v. Campbell, 36 Maine, 346 ; Davis v. Stevens, 57 Maine, 594; Moor v. Shaw, 47 Maine, 90. … Whether the complainant is the sole owner of the land described in the complaint, depends upon the validity of a tax-deed given by Abner Brown, collector of taxes for the town of Monson, to Aretas Chapin, bearing no date,

Perkins

141 Me. 137 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 18, 1944

Gilman, supra, but, expressly, that it is important whether the wife has contributed to the acquisition of the estate, Brown et al. v. Hodgdon, 31 Me., 65. … It has been declared with some frequency in this Court that each case involving an allowance under our statute should be determined upon its own particular facts, Brown v. Hodgdon, supra; Kersey v.

Dishon v. Maine State Retirement System

569 A.2d 1216 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 8, 1990

Beaulieu v. City of Lewiston, 440 A.2d 334, 338 (Me.1982); see also Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221, 230, 238-39 , 101 S.Ct. 1074, 1080, 1084-85 , 67 L.Ed.2d 186 (1981). … McNicholas v. York Beach Village Corp., 394 A.2d 264, 269 (Me.1978).

Forbes-Lilley v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission

643 A.2d 377 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 16, 1994

Although the review board sent her a copy of its decision and informed her of her right to appeal the decision, the claimant did not contest the board’s finding. … In McInnis v. Maine Unemployment Ins.

State v. Prior

662 A.2d 225 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 1995

The officer testified that there were four Coast Guard reports concerning the incident: a Boarding Report, a situation report, a Supplemental Boarding Report, and a dispatcher’s log. … See Libby v. Concord General Mut. Ins. Co., 452 A.2d 979 (Me.1982). The record contains no evidence demonstrating either an express, implied, or apparent agency relationship.

Burton v. Mayo

106 Me. 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 2, 1909

by no more than one-fourth of an inch that board must be scaled as of the next lesser specified length. … The case of Chase v. Bradley, 17 Maine, 89, cited by the defendant, is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar.