Case law

Inhabitants of Bradley v. Penobscot Chemical Fibre Co.

104 Me. 276 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 29, 1908

But for the cutting up process in Bradley, we think the principles declared in Ellsworth v. Brown, 53 Maine, 519, and Farmingdale v. … In Ellsworth v.

Boisvert v. Reed

692 A.2d 921 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 7, 1997

See 618 A.2d at 213 ; Keating v. … Gagne v.

Libby ex rel. Libby v. Legrow

400 A.2d 381 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 19, 1979

Ferguson v. Bret- *383 ton, Me., 375 A.2d 225, 227 (1977); Lyman v. Bourque, Me., 374 A.2d 588, 590 (1977); Lowery v. Owen M. Taylor & Sons, Inc., Me., 374 A.2d 325, 327 (1977); Gowell v. … Thompson, Me., 341 A.2d 381, 384 (1975); Avery v. Brown, Me., 288 A.2d 713, 715 (1972); see Wing v. Morse, Me., 300 A.2d 491 (1973). The entry is: Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed. WERNICK, J., did not sit. .

Smith v. Market Square Health Care Center

704 A.2d 379 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1997

See Rosetti v. … We recently rejected a similar contention in Ray v. Carland Constr., Inc., 1997 ME 206, ¶ 6 , 703 A.2d 648 .

Carey v. Osgood

18 Me. 152 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1841

Slasson v. Brown et al. 20 Pick. 437 , has been cited as an opposing authority. That depended upon the revised law of Massachusetts, c. 98, for the relief of poor prisoners. … It does not therefore conflict with Agry v. Betts, the statute of Massachusetts not containing the provision, which was the ground of that decision.

Dean v. W. S. Given Co.

123 Me. 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1923

Dyer v. Libby, 61 Maine, 45. Also see Edwards v. Brown, *93 98 Maine, 165. … Marsh v. Hyde, 3 Gray, 331 . See, supporting that idea, Thompson v. Alger, 12 Met., 428 ; Browne, Statute of Frauds, Sec. 343; Williston on Contracts, Sec. 566; Dallavo v. Richardson, (Mich.), 96 N. W., 20 .

Knight v. Burnham

90 Me. 294 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 27, 1897

Plaintiff claims to recover the price of boards sold by him to defendant by the thousand feet. Defense that the boards were not surveyed by a sworn surveyor, before delivery as *295 required by R. S., c. 41, § 15. … Richmond v. Foss, 77 Maine, 590. Plaintiff replies that he surveyed the boards, and that he was a legal surveyor of lumber.

Stratton v. Bailey

80 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1888

True the father paid nothing for his board, and that may have been furnished by the husband. But providing the board is not a provision of the labor. … Colby v. Lamson, 39 Maine, 119 ; Oxnard v. Swanton, Id. 125. By R.

Thompson v. Consolidated Constructors

677 A.2d 554 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1996

We conclude that the Board, pursuant to Beaulieu v. … Gurney v. Commercial Welding Co., Me. W.C.C.App.Div. 733, 735 (Me.1992); Milles v. Carl Thompson, Jr., Me. W.C.C.App.Div. 4152, 4155-56 (Me.1990). See also Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr.

Bixby v. Whitney

5 Me. 192 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1827

The verdict proves that the note in the present case has not been paid, either in boards or money. The motion is overruled. … Webster v. Lee 5. Mass. 334. Hodges v. Hodges 9. Mass. 320. Smith v. Whiting 11. Mass. 445, and cases there cited.

Parsons v. City of Bangor

61 Me. 457 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1872

In Briggs v. … In Colton v.

Penley v. City of Auburn

21 L.R.A. 657 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1893

Baldwin v. Bangor, 36 Maine, 518 ; Bryant v. Biddeford, 39 Maine, 193; Farrell v. Oldtown, 69 Maine, 72; Wellman v. Dickey, 78 Maine, 29. … S., c. 17, § § 5-11, 12, 13 ; Dickey v. Maine Telegraph Co. supra; Brown v. Watson, 47 Maine, 161; Davis v. Weymouth, 80 Maine, 307; Holmes v. Corthell, 80 Maine, 31; Jackson v. Castle, 80 Maine, 119 ; S.

Richardson v. Maine Employment Security Commission

229 A.2d 326 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 1967

Category B: Ball Brothers Company, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division (1963), 135 Ind.App. 68 , 189 N.E.2d 429 , no compensation. Fahl et al. v. … Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation (June 1965), 2 Ohio App.2d 286 , 207 N. E.2d 774 , remanded to the Board of Review due to insufficiency of the record. Marcum v. Ohio Match Co. et al.

Nutter v. Bailey

32 Me. 504 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1851

This suit appears to have been commenced to recover the value of boards sold and delivered by the intestate to the defendant. … Whitman v. Freeze, 23 Maine, 185. The testimony of Samuel Ames was legally admissible to prove the acts of the defendant, and that a survey was made by his direction.

J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. Stahl

117 Me. 190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1918

People’s National Bank v. Nickerson, 108 Maine, 341; Austin v. Baker, 112 Maine, 267. For this reason we should be amply justified in overruling the exceptions. … Co. v. Hodgkins, 66 Maine, 109. When a person signs a written contract he is presumed, by the ordinary rales of law, to know its contents, whether read or not. Great Northern Mfg. Co. v. Brown, 113 Maine, 51.

Garing v. Fraser

76 Me. 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 23, 1884

Dunlap v. Glidden, 31 Maine, 435, 439; Severance v. Judkins, 73 Maine, 379 ; Damport v. Sympson, Cro. Eliz. 520; Eyres v. Sedgwicke, Cro. Jac. 601; Phelps v. Stearns, 4 Gray, 106 ; Rice v. … Parker v. Huntington, 2 Gray, 128 ; Brown v. Lakeman, 12 Cush. 482 and cases there cited; Parker v. Farley, 10 Cush. 279 . And even if we adopt the suggestions as to the inflexibility of the rule of Ch. Jus.

Cottle Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Farmington

693 A.2d 330 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 5, 1997

According to the Town’s sewer ordinance, such permits may be obtained only by applying to the Sewer Commission, comprised of the Board of Selectmen. [¶4] In March, the Planning Board approved Cottle’s project unanimously, … Smoke Rise, Inc. v.

Hopkins v. Hersey

20 Me. 449 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1841

Brown v. Wotton, Cro. James, 73; Adam v. Brougton, 2 Strange, 278; Murrell v. Johnson, 1 Hen. & Munf. 450, and Floyd v. … Browne, 1 Rawle, 121 , establish the position, that a change of title is effected by the judgment, without satisfaction. And the law is so laid down in 1 Chitty’s Pl. 76, and in 3 Dane, c. 77, art. 1, <§> 2.

Moores v. Inhabitants of Springfield

144 Me. 54 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 28, 1949

In the case of Rettinger v. School Board, 109 A. … Bank, 108 Fed. 505 , Coffin et al. v. Board of Com’rs., 114 Fed. 518 and the same case on appeal in Board of Commissioners v.

Town of Vienna v. Kokernak

612 A.2d 870 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 28, 1992

See Marxsen v. Board of Directors, Maine School Admin. Dist. No. 5, 591 A.2d 867, 872 (Me.1991). … See Fichter v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 604 A.2d 433, 437 (Me.1992). In the instant case the procedure that was used allowed both parties to present their positions.