Case law

Smith v. State

157 Me. 355 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1961

In November, 1959 the joint board had entertained the issue of damages and had rendered their decisions on November 24, A. D. 1959. The joint board by registered mail dated December 3, A. … Hayford v. Bangor, 103 Me. 434, 437 .)

State v. Ferris

284 A.2d 288 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1971

Commonwealth v. Certain Gambling Implements, 317 Mass. 160 , 57 N.E.2d 542 (1944); Cooper v. Miami, 160 Fla. 656 , 36 So.2d 195 (1948); James v. … Koller v. Duggan, 346 Mass. 270 , 191 N.E.2d 475 (1963); Hackett v. Gale, 104 N.H. 90 , 179 A.2d 451 (1962); Butler Fair and Agricultural Assn. v. Butler School District, 389 Pa. 169 , 132 A.2d 214 (1957).

Mariner v. A.P. Concrete

953 A.2d 1146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2008

Both the employer who accepts the claim and files a memorandum of payment, thus establishing a payment scheme, see Valliere v. Workers’ Comp. … Farris v.

Pattangall v. Gilman

115 Me. 344 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 1916

Curtis, appointed the said Henry Gilman as a member of said board of dental examiners, to fill the vacancy in *346 said board arising by reason of the expiration of the term of office of the relator, Will S. … As said by the court in State v.

Victor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands International

179 A.3d 312 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 8, 2018

See Labbe v. … In LaRochelle v.

Hardy v. Tilton

68 Me. 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 8, 1878

Reddick v. Smith, 4 Illinois, 451. Dawson v. Holbrook, 1 Ohio, 135. Crane v. Freese, 1 Harrison, (N. J.) 305. Conant v. Bicknell, 1 D. Chipman, (Vt.) 50. Farmers' Bank v. Beaston, 7 Gill & Johnson, (Md.) 421. Jones v. … Thompson v. Brown, 17 Pick. 462 .

Gilman v. Dwelling-House Insurance

81 Me. 488 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 23, 1889

Brown, 10 Maine, 49, 51; Little v. Thurston, 58 Maine, 86, 88, and the cases there cited; Ockington v. Law, 66 Maine, 551. … Co. v. Brown, 43 N. Y. 396 ; Buck v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 76 Maine, 586, 588; Walsh v. Phila. Fire Association, 127 Mass. 383, 385 ; Tyler v. Ætna Ins. Co., 12 Wend. 507 . In the case of Fowle v. Springfield Ins.

Oliver v. Berry

53 Me. 206 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1865

Brower v. Fisher, 4 Johns. Ch., 441 . In this case, Chancellor Eest says that, the presumption is a reasonable one, and that a special examination to repel the inference of imbecility seems always to have been required. … See also 1 Greenl. on Ev., § 366, and 2 Kent’s Com., 452, (Little & Brown’s Ed. 609,) and authorities there cited.

State v. Pierce

770 A.2d 630 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2001

Brown, 1998 ME 129, ¶ 6 , 712 A.2d 513, 516 (quoting State v. … See, e.g., Brown, 1998 ME 129, ¶ 8 , 712 A.2d at 516 (finding that the number of the offenses charged “alone is not dispositive of the joinder issue”); State v.

Quintal v. City of Hallowell

956 A.2d 88 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 7, 2008

Moen v. … Danforth v.

Bureau of Taxation v. Town of Madison

541 A.2d 939 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1988

Faucher v. City of Auburn, 465 A.2d 1120, 1124 (Me.1983). … (citing Seven Islands Land Co. v. Maine Land Use Regulation Comm’n, 450 A.2d 475, 480 (Me.1982).

Holmes v. Corthell

80 Me. 31 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 1888

Hathorn v. Eaton, 70 Maine, 219. … S., c. 17, § 12; Brown v. Watson, 47 Maine, 161 ; Dudley v. Kennedy, 63 Maine, 465 ; and from the person maintaining it after, request to abate it. Pillsbury v. Moore, 44 Maine, 154.

Gilbert v. Dodge

130 Me. 417 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 14, 1931

Hammatt v. Emerson, 27 Me., 308, 326; Pratt v. Philbrook, 33 Me., 17, 22; Long v. Woodman, 58 Me., 49, 52; Braley v. Powers, 92 Me., 203; Atlas Shoe Company v. Bechard, 102 Me., 197; Eastern Trust & Banking Company v. … S., Chap. 91, Sec. 28; Cameron v. Tyler, 71 Me., 27; State v. Brown, 75 Me., 456; Copeland v. Hewett, 93 Me., 554. These exceptions being sustained, the writs are left with legally insufficient declarations.

City of Augusta v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway

114 Me. 24 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 7, 1915

Said board may require the officers of the railroad company and of the municipality to attend a hearing in the matter, after such notice of the hearing to. all parties in interest as said board may deem proper. … By the allegation in the petition, which, on a motion to dismiss must be taken to be true, Rines v. Portland, 93 Maine, 227, it appears that the parties in this case adopted the voluntary method.

Jones v. Smith

79 Me. 446 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 1887

Brown, 13 Maine, 236. " The gist of trespass to personal properly is the injury dónete the plaintiff’s possession. … Wilson v. Martin, 40 N. H. 91; Lunt v. Brown, supra; Muggridge v. Eveleth, 9 Met. 235 ; Wade v. Mason, 12 Gray, 335 .

Penobscot Chemical Fibre Co. v. Inhabitants of Bradley

99 Me. 263 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1904

Manchester Mills v. Manchester, 57 N. H. 309; Randell v. Bridgeport, 63 Conn. 321 . … The assessors are an independent statutory board. They are not agents of the town. Their opinions are not the town’s opinions by relation. Rockland v. Farnsworth, 93 Maine, 178.

Hutchins v. Hutchins

136 Me. 513 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 4, 1939

Our Court, in Emmett v. … The latest pronouncement of our Court is found in Cushman Co. v.

Town of Madawaska v. Richard Cayer

103 A.3d 547 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 2014

of Selectmen, during which the Board members heard testimony from the Cayers and the CEO, the Board found the Cayers in violation of the ordinance and directed them to remove the one remaining trailer by July 2010, pay … The Cayers did not appeal the Board’s June 2010 decision to the Superior Court pursuant to M.R. Civ.

State v. Lux

740 A.2d 556 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 16, 1999

State v. Bradley, 658 A.2d 236, 237 (Me.1995) (citing Texas v. … See, e.g., State v.

Harris' Case

124 Me. 68 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 25, 1924

These acts created a Board of Directors of the Port of Portland and gave to this board charge of the construction and administration of the State Pier at Portland and provided that all revenues should be covered into the … Eden v. Southwest Harbor, 108 Maine, 489. Opinion of Justices, 120 Maine, 569. 25 R. C. L., 918.