Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,972 results
1.26s
99 Me. 426 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1904
Amherst Bank v. Root, 2 Met. 522 ; Middlesex Co. v. Lawrence, 1 Allen 339 ; Railroad Co. v. Elwell, 8 Allen 371 . The obligors remain bound because as was intimated by Chief Justice Shaw in *430 Chelmsford Co. v. … The case of Norris v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedHackett v. Western Express, Inc.
21 A.3d 1019 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 23, 2011
Mary's Regional Medical Center v. Bath Iron Works, 2009 ME 92, ¶ 7 , 977 A.2d 431, 433 . … Although federal law does not control how we define average weekly wage, see Clukey v. Piscataquis Cnty.
Cited 7 timesPublished77 Me. 590 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 1885
Can a seller recover the price of boards and shingles sold and delivered without a survey by some proper officer ? This point is determined against the plaintiff by the case of Durgin v. Dyer, 68 Maine, 143. … Abbott v. Goodwin, 37 Maine, 203 ; Rogers v. Humphrey, 39 Maine, 382. These cases stood in their day on the outermost verge of the law on which they were decided.
Cited 2 timesPublished151 Me. 312 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 1955
The plaintiff in the case of Wood v. Browne and the defendant in the case of Browne v. Wood being allegedly aggrieved except to the acceptance of the referees’ report filed in the Superior Court for Cumberland County. … Plaintiff Browne acquired Lot No. 37, plaintiff Wood acquired lot No. 36.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWarren v. Inhabitants of Stetson
30 Me. 231 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849
Trustees of ministerial and school fund in Levant v. Parks, 1 Fairf. 441; 3 Fairf. 381. … But it is the treasurer of the board, chosen by the trustees, not the treasurer of the town, who is empowered to execute the deed.
Cited 0 timesPublished4-One Box Machine Makers v. Wirebounds Patents Co.
131 Me. 70 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 23, 1932
At 9:30 on the morning of March 9, the full board of directors met. No minutes of the meeting were made. In such a case, action taken may be established by parol. Peirce v. … Tower v. Haslam, 84 Me., 86, 90.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAnheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Walton
135 Me. 57 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 9, 1937
Their interest is clear and immediate, within the rule approved in Truax v. Raich, Truax v. Corrigan, and Terrace v. … Cook Brewing Co. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished79 Me. 71 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 1887
Levant v. Co. Commissioners, 67 Maine, 435; Tewksbury v. Co. Commissioners, 117 Mass. 564 ; Fairbanks v. Fitchburg, 132 Mass. 43 . … Howland v. Co. Com. 49 Maine. 143; Hicks v. Ward, 69 Maine, 441. Nor do we think the present case is one which calls for any exception to-the rule.
Cited 1 timesPublished58 Me. 439 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1870
In Brown v. … Brown v. Atwood, 7 Greenl. 356.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTown of Poland v. T & M Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
987 A.2d 524 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 21, 2010
Brown, 3 Reform of the Rules for Attachments, 7 Me. … McGillivray v. Royal Ins.
Cited 10 timesPublished66 Me. 469 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1876
Stevens v. Merrill, 110 Mass. 57, 59 . In that case the court say that “when a mortgageor obtains a decree of redemption his right is thereby defined, and no other or different right remains to him. … Borromscale v. Tuttle, 5 Allen, 377 . Gerrish v. Black, 109 Mass. 474 . Brown v. Simons, 45 N. H. 211. 2 Hill Mort. 105.
Cited 3 timesPublished71 Me. 309 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1880
New Orleans v. Wardens, etc., 11 La. An. 244. … First Baptist Church v. R. R. Co. 5 Barb. 79 , and cases there cited.
Cited 10 timesPublished117 Me. 194 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1918
From the photographs introduced in the case it appears that the sides and ends of the building were boarded down to the ground or, as the plaintiff’s father stated, “it was boarded from the ground to the eaves.” … Russell v. M. C. R. R., 100 Maine, 406; McClain v. Caribou National Bank, 100 Maine, 437; Moffatt v. Kenny, 174 Mass., 311 .
Cited 10 timesPublished157 Me. 355 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1961
In November, 1959 the joint board had entertained the issue of damages and had rendered their decisions on November 24, A. D. 1959. The joint board by registered mail dated December 3, A. … Hayford v. Bangor, 103 Me. 434, 437 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished284 A.2d 288 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1971
Commonwealth v. Certain Gambling Implements, 317 Mass. 160 , 57 N.E.2d 542 (1944); Cooper v. Miami, 160 Fla. 656 , 36 So.2d 195 (1948); James v. … Koller v. Duggan, 346 Mass. 270 , 191 N.E.2d 475 (1963); Hackett v. Gale, 104 N.H. 90 , 179 A.2d 451 (1962); Butler Fair and Agricultural Assn. v. Butler School District, 389 Pa. 169 , 132 A.2d 214 (1957).
Cited 7 timesPublished47 Me. 109 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1860
Brown, 34 Maine, 107. When an article is manufactured to order, delivery only can pass a title. Hilliard on Sales, 28; 2 Kent’s Com., 504. The contract here was merely executory. … Bennett v. Platt, 9 Pick., 558 ; Brewer & al. v. Smith, 3 Maine, 44. The non-suit was properly ordered. Exceptions overruled,. Tenney, 0. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, and Kent, JJ., concurred.
Cited 0 timesPublished953 A.2d 1146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2008
Both the employer who accepts the claim and files a memorandum of payment, thus establishing a payment scheme, see Valliere v. Workers’ Comp. … Farris v.
Cited 0 timesPublished115 Me. 344 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 1916
Curtis, appointed the said Henry Gilman as a member of said board of dental examiners, to fill the vacancy in *346 said board arising by reason of the expiration of the term of office of the relator, Will S. … As said by the court in State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished31 Me. 62 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849
State v. Burlingham & al. 15 Maine, 104; Griffin v. Brown, 2 Pick. 304 . Even m a collateral proceeding, if her testimony would be the means of discord and contention between her and her husband, it would be rejected. … The People v. Bill, 10 Johns. 94 ; Gilmore v. Bowden & al. 3 Faif. 412; Commonwealth v. Marsh & al. 10 Pick. 57 . But the wife is not a party to the record, and therefore does not fall within the rule.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGilman v. Dwelling-House Insurance
81 Me. 488 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 23, 1889
Brown, 10 Maine, 49, 51; Little v. Thurston, 58 Maine, 86, 88, and the cases there cited; Ockington v. Law, 66 Maine, 551. … Co. v. Brown, 43 N. Y. 396 ; Buck v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 76 Maine, 586, 588; Walsh v. Phila. Fire Association, 127 Mass. 383, 385 ; Tyler v. Ætna Ins. Co., 12 Wend. 507 . In the case of Fowle v. Springfield Ins.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna