Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,972 results
3.34s
Campbell v. School Administrative District No. 59
658 A.2d 1094 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 30, 1995
Lucas v. E.A. Buschmann, Inc., 656 A.2d 1193, 1195 (Me.1995); Gordon v. Maine Reduction Co., 358 A.2d 544, 551 (Me.1976). … We accord deference to decisions of the Board interpreting the Workers’ Compensation Act. Curtis v. National Sea Prods., 657 A.2d 320, 322 (Me.1995).
Cited 2 timesPublished8 Me. 32 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1831
. — But it- is alleged, on the part of the plaintiff, that this contract was entered into in reference to a usage or custom prevailing among log dealers on the Kennebec river, to ascertain the quantity of boards which may … Williams v. Gilman, 3 Greenl. 267; 2 Stark. Ev. 453.
Cited 1 timesPublished366 A.2d 174 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1976
State v. Brown, 321 A.2d 478, 483 (Me.1974). On review we look only to see if there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. See State v. Gervais, 317 A.2d 796, 800 (Me.1974); State v. Ryder, 348 A.2d 1, 4 (Me.1975). … State v. Brown, 321 A.2d at 482 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedLucas J. Sirois v. Town of Rangeley
271 A.3d 790 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 24, 2022
v. TOWN OF RANGELEY et al. PER CURIAM [¶1] Lucas J. … See Day v. State Tax Assessor, 2008 ME 39, ¶ 1, 942 A.2d 685. The entry is: Judgment affirmed. Lynne Williams, Esq.
Cited 0 timesPublished68 Me. 425 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 24, 1878
Keyes v. Rebecca J. Parker, certain personal property, which he placed in the defendant’s hands for safe keeping and for which he took his receipt. … Drew v. Livermore, 40 Maine, 266. He cannot impeach it for fraud. Brown v. Atwell, 31 Maine, 351. Nor for irregularity. Clifford v. Plumer, 45 N. H. 269.
Cited 2 timesPublished259 A.3d 127 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 14, 2021
Id. at 237. [¶41] In Brown v. Illinois, the United States Supreme Court discussed at length the application of the exclusionary rule. 422 U.S. 590 (1975). … All three of the Brown factors support suppression of Akers’s confession, as well as the searches.
Cited 12 timesPublished748 A.2d 1001 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 12, 2000
The entry is: The decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board is vacated. Remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein. … The Board concluded, and S.D.
Cited 2 timesPublished974 A.2d 898 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 2009
Rule, ch. 2, § 2(7). [¶ 9] Tambrands relies on Abbott v. … Tucker v. Associated Grocers of Me.
Cited 0 timesPublished681 A.2d 4 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 1996
v. … Clark v. Rust Eng’g Co., 595 A.2d 416, 419 (Me.1991). See also Fletcher v.
Cited 12 timesPublished73 Me. 497 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 29, 1882
Smith v. Brown, 61 Maine, 70. If it was sufficient to serve it upon the attorney of record, it was competent for him to waive any illegality in the service. Lord v. Skinner, 9 Allen, 376 . The case finds that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMaine Milk Commission v. Cumberland Farms Northern, Inc.
160 Me. 366 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 3, 1964
In Milk Control Board of Pennsylvania v. Eisenberg Farm, Products, 306 U. … Milk Control Board v. Eisenberg Farm Products, 306 US 346 , 83 L ed 752, 59 S Ct 528 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedInhabitants of Machias v. Inhabitants of Wesley
99 Me. 17 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 25, 1904
Ellsworth v. … Ken nebunk v. Alfred, 19 Maine, 221; Hampden v. Newburgh, 67 Maine, 370.
Cited 0 timesPublished868 A.2d 172 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 3, 2005
There is a provision in the ordinance authorizing the Gorham Planning Board to waive the fee. Id. at ch. … See Fisher v. Dame, 433 A.2d 366, 374 (Me.1981). [¶ 13] Here, there is no dispute that the Planning Board had authority to consider, approve, and attach conditions to approvals of subdivisions.
Cited 46 timesPublished161 Me. 317 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 1965
special conditions of parole imposed by the board.” 34 M. … See for example Milburn v. Nierstheimer, 401 I. 465, 82 N. E. (2nd) 438, 35 C. J. S., Extradition, § 21 (b), and 22 Am. Jur., Extradition, § 19. See Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 15 M. R. S. A., §§ 201-227.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMaine State Employees Ass'n v. State, Department of Defense & Veterans' Services
436 A.2d 394 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 2, 1981
Board of School Directors, Maine School Administrative District No. 52 v. Tri-Town Teachers Association, 412 A.2d at 992-93 . … Board of School Directors, Maine School Administrative District No. 52 v. Tri-Town Teachers Association, 412 A.2d at 994 . Here, the language of Article XXIV(F) could conceivably support the claim of the MSEA.
Cited 17 timesPublishedMatthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc.
266 A.2d 240 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1970
In Brown’s Case, 123 Me. 424 , 123 A. 421 (1924) a fatal heart dilation resulted from the exertion of shovelling snow. In Patrick v. J. B. … Brown’s Case, supra, 123 Me. at 425 , 123 A. at 422 .
Cited 28 timesPublished78 Me. 509 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1886
What rules, what commands, and what punishments shall be imposed, are necessarily largely within the discretion of the master, where none are defined by the school board. In State v. Pendergrass, 2 D. & B. (N. … The subject was incidentally considered in Stevens v.
Cited 12 timesPublished78 Me. 118 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 30, 1886
Mitchell v. Rockland, 52 Maine, 118; Brown v. Vinalhaven, 65 Maine, 402; Woodcock v. Calais, 66 Maine, 234; Hill v. Boston, 122 Mass. 344 ; Gordon v. … Boston, 104 Mass. 87 ; Hafford v. New Bedford, 16 Gray, 297 ; Shearman and Redfield on Negligence, § 139; Dillon on Municipal Corporations, (3d ed.) § 976.
Cited 12 timesPublishedFrye v. Inhabitants of Town of Cumberland
464 A.2d 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 15, 1983
Gashgai v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 390 A.2d 1080 , 1082 n. 1 (Me.1978). … Meanwhile, the Board commenced proceedings, and Dr. Sullivan signed the complaint in his capacity as Secretary of the Board. Dr.
Cited 19 timesPublished21 Me. 446 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1842
Walcot v. Pomeroy, 2 Pick. 121 ; Lunt v. Brown, 1 Shepl. 236.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna