Case law

Cushing v. Wyman

38 Me. 589 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

Norton v. Young, 3 Greenl. 30. … The plaintiff cannot retain the note of Brown & McCrillis, which he received of the defendants, and at the same time enforce his claim for the horses, which he has admitted to have been paid by that note.

Grubb v. S.D. Warren Co.

837 A.2d 117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 2003

Dillingham v. … see Ervey v.

State v. Smith

435 A.2d 408 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1981

State v. Lagasse, Me., 410 A.2d 537, 542 (1980), quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2792 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). … See State v. King, Me., 379 A.2d 131, 133 (1977).

McIntire v. Plaisted

68 Me. 363 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1878

Cushing v. Thompson, 34 Maine, 496. White v. Brown, 2 Cush. 412 . King v. Ins. Co., 7 Cush. 1 . Bill dismissed, with costs. Appleton, C. J., Babbows, Yibgin, Petebs and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

McAdam v. United Parcel Service & Helmsman Management Services, Inc.

763 A.2d 1173 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 9, 2001

In Freeman v. … Clukey v.

Stubbs v. State

281 A.2d 134 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 9, 1971

The single Justice relied upon State v. Phinney, 42 Me. 384 , and State v. … In State v.

State of Maine v. Jessee Mackin

234 A.3d 1232 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 2020

Facts [¶2] Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, see State v. … Brown, 2017 ME 59, ¶ 7, 158 A.3d 501 (quotation marks omitted).

Bean v. Central Maine Power Co.

133 Me. 9 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 1934

Brown v. DeNormandie, 123 Me., 535, 541, (1924) 124 A., 697 . … Moor v. Shaw, 47 Me., 88; Miles v. United Box Board Co., 108 Me., 270, 80 A., 706 .

Bailey v. City of Lewiston

168 A.3d 762 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 2017

Hird v. … See State v.

Maine Department of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife v. Maine State Employees Ass'n

503 A.2d 1285 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 31, 1986

Maine Labor Relations Bd., 413 A.2d 510, 515-16 (Me.1980) (quoting Board of Education v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, 30 N.Y.2d 122, 129 , 331 N.Y.S.2d 17, 23 , 282 N.E.2d 109, 113 (1972)). … Since the Board is not charged with enforcing section 7036(6), no deference is accorded to the Board. Cf. State v. Maine Labor Relations Bd., 413 A.2d at 514 .

Lippman v. Town of Lincolnville

739 A.2d 842 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 1999

. [¶ 3] We review the Board of Appeals’ decision directly for abuse of discretion, legal error, or findings unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. See Pitcher v. Town of Wayne, 599 A.2d 1155, 1156 (Me.1991). … See Banks v. Maine RSA # 1, 1998 ME 272, ¶ 4 , 721 A.2d 655, 657 . Plaintiffs argue strenuously for an absurd and unreasonable result.

Boston & Maine Railroad v. Saco Valley Electric Railroad

98 Me. 78 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 18, 1903

That decree was afterwards changed by the board upon petition of the Maine Central Eailroad, and the court sustained the commission in its action. (Mamie Central R. R. Co. v. B. O. & O. Railway Co., 89 Maine, 555.) … No power is reserved to the board suo motu to modify or change a decision once made. In the case of the Maine Central R. R. Co. v. B. O. & O. Ry.

State v. Botelho

568 A.2d 1102 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 1990

With one exception, the issues raised on this appeal are controlled by our opinion in Department of Environmental Protection v. Emerson, 563 A.2d 762 (Me.1989). … Department of Environmental Protection v. Emerson, 563 A.2d at 768 . The record reflects that 10 to 12 million tires are presently stored at defendants’ facility.

State v. Sirois

478 A.2d 1117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 1984

Brennan v. Saco Construction, Inc., 381 A.2d 656, 662 (Me.1978). … Ackerman v.

Chequinn Corporation v. Mullen

159 Me. 375 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 19, 1963

Goodwin v. Nedjip, 117 Me. 339, 342 , 104 A. 519 . The statute carries no right of appeal from a denial by the board (or as here the municipal officers or town council). … Illinois State Board of Dental Examiners v. People (I ll.) 13 N. E. 201, 202 .

Commercial Union Insurance v. Maine Employers' Mutual Insurance

794 A.2d 77 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 2002

See, e.g., Bennett v. Prawer, 2001 ME 172, ¶ 8 , 786 A.2d 605, 608 ; Union River Valley Teachers Assoc. v. Lamoine Sch. Comm., 2000 ME 57, ¶ 5 , 748 A.2d 990, 991-92 ; Board. of Dirs. of Maine S.A.D. 33 v. … Bd. v.

Woodbury v. Maine Central Railroad

110 Me. 224 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 3, 1913

During the progress of the work, and during the night following, the area of blocks 1 and 2 was surrounded by a fence three or four feet high, with two boards on each, and board uprights at the corners. … Maxfield v. Maine Central R. R. Co., 100 Maine, 79. ' The plaintiff himself was bound to exercise ordinary care. All passengers are.

Napp v. Parks Camp, Ltd.

932 A.2d 531 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 4, 2007

Yeadon Fabric Domes, Inc. v. Me. … App.1988); Balvik v. Sylvester, 411 N.W.2d 383, 385-88 (N.D.1987); Baker v.

Smith v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

940 A.2d 1079 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 15, 2008

Lewiston Daily Sun v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 43 1999 ME 143, ¶ 16 , 738 A.2d 1239, 1243 (quotation marks omitted). … See Ten Voters of the City of Biddeford v. City of Biddeford, 2003 ME 59, ¶ 9 , 822 A.2d 1196, 1200 .

Dennett v. Dow

17 Me. 19 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1840

In Brown v. Bellows, 4 Pick. 179 , this was expressly held not to be in conflict with the general rule, and upon that ground admitted. In Whitaker v. … Salisbury, 15 Pick. 544, the court decide, that the party who calls a witness, shall not be permitted to impeach his general character, which they state was also decided in Brown v. Bellows .