Case law

Carver v. State

482 Md. 469 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 20, 2022

In Hunt, this Court described what qualifies as “newly discovered evidence” within the context of Maryland Rule 4-331(c), which is equally applicable to actual innocence proceedings under Crim. … In my view, this was clearly erroneous. The circuit court did not explain how, under any realistic assessment of what actually transpired at trial, Mr.

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Rodeheaver

197 Md. 632 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 17, 1951

The appellant posted bulletins advertising for a man qualified to do this work. Mr. … be found to be a cause of the accident, but just as clearly the speed of the train had nothing to do with it.

Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United States

355 Md. 110 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 29, 1999

Transit I (“right of way” and “parcel of land”), but it more clearly indicates an easement was granted than D.C. … No single factor is usually sufficient to establish the inference of abandonment. Id.

Oglesby v. State

441 Md. 673 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 23, 2015

The sentencing provision is qualified in paragraph (3) of the subsection. … Where, as here, Congress conveyed its purpose clearly, ... we decline to manufacture ambiguity where none exists.” United States v.

Mizen v. Thomas

156 Md. 313 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 17, 1929

By the decisions of this court the respective interests of mortgagor and mortgagee have been frequently and clearly defined. In Ford v. … One is that there is no evidence that they were ever able to redeem the property, and such inferences as may be drawn from the established facts indicate that they were not.

Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford County

414 Md. 1 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 11, 2010

For reasons clearly set forth in the testimony of Mr. Westmoreland, the St. … The Express Powers Act clearly contemplates zoning as an activity that exists in a sphere separate from the operations of State level regulation.

In the Matter of Judge Pamela J. White

451 Md. 630 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 22, 2017

In particular, the statute provides for the issuance and enforcement of subpoenas, service of process, administration of oaths or affirmations by witnesses, and grants of immunity to witnesses. Id. … State, 276 Md. 638, 647 (1976) (“it is firmly established that an accused has a constitutional right to a fair trial but not necessarily to that seldom experienced rarity, a perfect trial”) (quotation marks and citations

Evans v. State

333 Md. 660 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 16, 1994

, and they were clearly sufficient to meet the standard enunciated in Morgan v. … Other than that they would both serve life sentences, no attempt was made to establish a correlation, close or otherwise, between the two.

Questar Builders, Inc. v. CB Flooring, LLC

410 Md. 241 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 25, 2009

And clearly told me that he felt there was a—a warranted dollar change, and it was in the magnitude of $103,000, and that he clearly would not proceed to do the work without a signed change order in that amount of money. … to the trial court’s factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard does not, of course, apply to legal conclusions.’ ” Karsenty v.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. James

385 Md. 637 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 16, 2005

The evidence adduced at the hearing clearly and unequivocally establishes that no written communication was sent to Mr. Kazim throughout Mr. … Kazim as a retainer and to pay for the costs of an investigator qualify as “trust money” under Section 10-301 of the Business Occupations and Professions Article.

Assanah-Carroll v. Law Offices of Maher

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 28, 2022

Under these definitions, residential tenants who lease real property qualify for protection under the MCPA. See Golt v. … under a private right of action established by the General Assembly.

Davis v. Frostburg Facility Operations

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 19, 2018

Panel members are selected at random from a listing of qualified arbitrators maintained by the Director of the ADR office. Id. § 3-2A- 04. … Because the complaint in Cannon did not clearly allege claims beyond the HCA, we remanded for further pleading. 296 Md. at 38–39.

Colmary v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.

124 Md. 476 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 12, 1915

The presumption in such cases is clearly stated by Judge Busks: in the late case of Dixon v. … In that ease, therefore, it will be for the party who seeks to establish a trust in behalf of the prayer of the purchase money to displace, by sufficient evidence, the presumption that exists in favor of the legal title.’

Casey v. Mayor of Rockville

400 Md. 259 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 30, 2007

The statutes make no distinction in terms of how and in what order, relative to the processing of a qualifying permit application, a property may be nominated for historic designation. … The record in the present case indicates clearly that notice was given and hearings were conducted with respect to the adoption of Ordinance No. 19-03.

Singh v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 26, 2026

Morton contains no explicit statement that—in all cases—placing an individual in a police cruiser automatically qualifies as an arrest. … Briscoe immediately made her way to the scene and began making calls to locate a qualified DRE. Det. Cpl.

Williams v. State

394 Md. 98 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 3, 2006

The information that question sough) to elicit was clearly not so prejudicial as a direct family relationship to a member of the State would be. … A direct family relationship to an employee of the State's Attor *116 ney's Office certainly qualifies as a reason that may affect a juror's impartiality and, thus, the fairness of the trial. .

Prince George's Co. v. Zimmer Dev.

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 20, 2015

We perceive also that the RDA seeks to foster a degree of independence in and immunize, to some extent, the Commission from undue grass roots and hierarchical political influence. … The access to Adelphi Road shall be clearly labeled as right-in/right-out access.

State v. Taylor

431 Md. 615 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 21, 2013

It is well established, however, that a defendant must provide a statement “from which the court could reasonably conclude” that the defendant desires to discharge his or her attorney, and proceed with new counsel or self-representation … At least there the parties discussed more clearly Taylor’s desire to substitute Stein for Amaral.

Williamson v. State

413 Md. 521 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 22, 2010

It explained: “What we have here is clearly an area where [Williamson] doesn’t have any expectation of privacy to begin with an object that he quite clearly left behind because he was done with it. … In so doing, ‘[w]e extend great deference to the fact finding of the suppression court and accept the facts as found by the court unless clearly erroneous.’ Nathan v.

Trimble v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 17, 2025

These are the ultimate criteria that a movant must establish to be entitled to a reduced sentence. … Means qualified his opinion that he too would have diagnosed Mr.