Case law

Radler v. Turco

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 8, 2020

See El Dia, Inc. v. Governor Rossello, 165 F.3d 106, 110 (1st Cir. 1999); cf. Krohne v. Peterson, 74 F.3d 1246, at *4–5 (9th Cir. 1996) (unpublished). States v. … Throneburg, 87 F.3d 851, 853 (6th Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Sanchez, 225 F.3d 172, 177 (2d Cir. 2000); McDonald v.

Thompson v. Abbott Laboratories

309 F. Supp. 2d 165 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 9, 2004

Board v. E.W. … Co. v.

Jackson v. Servello

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2020

United States v. Brown, 945 F.3d 597, 2 The judge presiding over Petitioner’s motion for a new trial was also the judge who entered Petitioner’s plea. Jackson, 2017 Mass. App. Unpub. … See Brown, 945 F.3d at 602 (quoting United States v. Wallace, 82 F. App’x 701, 702 (1st Cir. 2003)).

Insurance Recovery Group, Inc. v. Connolly

95 F. Supp. 3d 73 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2015

The courts disfavor block billing and have broad discretion in reducing fees requests, generally through an “across-the-board global fee reduction[ ].” Id. at 355 ; see also Torres-Rivera v. … Lipsett v. Blanco, 975 F.2d 934, 940 (1st Cir.1992).

Nickerson-Reti v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 17, 2018

Mass. 2011) (and cases cited); Brown v. Bank of Am., N.A., 67 F. Supp. 3d 508, 515-16 (D. Mass. 2014) (and cases cited). … Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 717 F.3d 224, 241-42 (1st Cir. 2013) (“Young I”) (loss of equity in home and damage to credit rating); Brown, 67 F.

Doe v. Sessions

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 1, 2018

On September 10, 2014, Doe appealed the IJ’s denial to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). (Id. ¶ 22). … See Rombot v. Moniz, 299 F. Supp. 3d 215, 217 (D.

London-Sire Records, Inc. v. Doe 1

542 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2008

July 25, 2006) (posting to internet bulletin boards); Gen. Bd. of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Church v. Cablevision Lightpath, Inc., No. CV-06-3669-ETB, 2006 WL 3479332 , at *4-*5 (E.D.N.Y. … Corp. v.

Paye v. Atrium Medical Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 20, 2023

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) (quoting International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 317 (1945)). … According to its president, Atrium maintains its own officers and board of directors and has its own bylaws, corporate records, financial records, payroll, and budgets. (Carlton Aff. ¶ 6, 9, 13).

Doucette v. Jacobs

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 17, 2018

See Wilber v. … , first/then board, mini schedules, “consistent routine,” transition cues, preferential seating for sensory needs, a slant board, supported seating that provided 90/90/90 degree angles (Rifton chair), discrete trials, preparation

Fine v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 7, 2022

Deeming that she had an obligation to do so, early on May 8, 2018, Mulligan reported the information she had been given to Guardian’s board of directors through the board’s crisis response special committee. … See also Suzuki v.

Swartz v. Schering-Plough Corp.

53 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 17, 1999

Between 1975 and 1976, these three individuals had repeated discussions about SUN-BUG with high-level employees at Schering including President Abraham Plough, 4 Board Member Harry Somson (“Somson”), and the Director of Product … See Hughes v.

Castaneda v. Souza

952 F. Supp. 2d 307 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 3, 2013

See Rumsfeld v. … In Saysana v.

Massachusetts Ass'n of Private Career Schools v. Healey

159 F. Supp. 3d 173 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 25, 2016

See Board of Trs. of State Univ. of N.Y. v. … See Wyeth v.

Luken Communications v. Brightcove, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 19, 2024

See Doe v. Brown Univ., 896 F.3d 127, 130 (1st Cir. 2018). Where appropriate, the Court also “‘supplement[s] those facts by reference to documents incorporated in the pleadings.’” Kando v. R.I. … Id.; see also Starr v.

Central Massachusetts Television, Inc. v. Amplicon, Inc.

930 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 29, 1996

Although the date is somewhere [d]own the road, I believe that it is a good idea to go ahead and get started with all of the paperwork, since I will have to present *21 your proposal to our Board for [its] consideration. … Finch, 57 Md.App. at 232 , 469 A.2d 867 ; accord, Robertson v.

American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc.

774 F. Supp. 2d 375 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 2011

See Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. … He also testified that a former employee of Defendant Biolitec, Joe Brown, invented “the fused cap design” in the early 1990s. (Id. at 158:14-159:8.)

I v. Services of America, Inc. v. Inn Development & Management, Inc.

7 F. Supp. 2d 79 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 13, 1998

Johnson v. State Mut. … Kelley v. National Labor Relations Board, 79 F.3d 1238, 1247 (1st Cir.1996). In the case at bar, no such evidence with respect to the applicable time period has been adduced.

Hickman v. Mittas Inn LLC.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 23, 2018

See Brown v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, 451 F. Supp. 2d 273, 277 (D. Mass. 2006) (“Pro se plaintiffs, like all parties, must ‘comply with the applicable procedural and substantive rules of law.’”) (quoting Overton v. … See Keating v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir. 1988); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986); Scott v.

Doe v. Sessions

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 19, 2018

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) subsequently dismissed her appeal. … On September 10, 2014, Nantume appealed the IJ’s denial to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). (Id. ¶ 22).

Lund v. Henderson

22 F. Supp. 3d 94 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 27, 2014

Dec. 15, 1994) (dismissal of criminal case when the plaintiff ‘stipulated that she would not run an illegal boarding house in the future’ was *108 not favorable termination for purposes of malicious prosecution claim). … V.