Case law

Pacheco v. Cambridge Technology Partners (Massachusetts), Inc.

85 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 1, 2000

Moran v. Levin, 318 Mass. 770, 773 , 64 N.E.2d 360 (1945); Zimmerman v. … See, e.g., Raab v. Gen.

Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. Sweet

83 F. Supp. 2d 214 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 9, 2000

United States v. … See Costa v.

James v. Cox

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 22, 2022

Workers v. 163 Pleasant St. … Noviello v.

Geshke v. Crocs, Inc.

889 F. Supp. 2d 253 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 7, 2012

On July 19, 2010, the Geshke family boarded an MBTA escalator at the Aquarium Station carrying patrons to the lower-level train platform. There were conspicuous warnings posted at the entrance to the escalator. … See also Uloth v.

Massachusetts v. Bull HN Information Systems, Inc.

16 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 7, 1998

See, e.g., EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities, 957 F.2d 424, 427 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 906 , 113 S.Ct. 299 , 121 L.Ed.2d 223 (1992). I will follow suit here. 19 . … Board of Governors, 957 F.2d at 428 (finding retaliation in collective bargaining provision that provided that grievances could not proceed to arbitration if employee brings ADEA claim); U.S. EEOC v.

Chao v. Ballista

772 F. Supp. 2d 337 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 25, 2011

Farmer v. … Thibault v.

Maple Grove Farms of Vermont, Inc. v. Euro-Can Products, Inc.

974 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 30, 1997

See Fennell v. … Jug 12 is designed in both brown and light blue. It also displays the "Spring Tree” name which is bordered on each side by a large tree with sap buckets. 7 .

Landry v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'n

177 F. Supp. 142 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 8, 1959

This Court finds that at the time of the collision the fair value of the catch on board the Mary J. Landry was “over $3,300”. R. 21. 22. If the Mary J. … A. v. Alliance Assur. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 50 F.Supp. 986 . Cf. Wetherell Bros. Co. v. United States Steel Co., 1 Cir., 200 F.2d 761, 763 . See Notes 64 Harv.L.Rev. 446, 72 Harv.L. Rev. 1154.

Chalverus v. Pegasystems, Inc.

59 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 30, 1999

Epstein v. … Wells v.

Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.

265 F.R.D. 14 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 4, 2010

DiFiore, 07-10070; Jones v. … Board of County Comm’rs of Arapahoe County, 945 P.2d 395, 403 (Colo. 1997); Ayotte Bros. Const. Co. v. Finney, 42 Conn.App. 578 , 680 A.2d 330, 332 (1996); News World Commc’ns, Inc. v.

Del Gallo v. Parent

545 F. Supp. 2d 162 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 28, 2008

See Burson v. … In Greer v.

Cox v. Massachusetts Department of Correction, et.al.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 10, 2019

See United States v. … .”); Onofrio v.

Rocha v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 23, 2020

White v. … v.

The Estate of Patrick G. Russi v. East Side Enterprises, LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 25, 2020

See Dartt v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 427 Mass. 1, 3 (1998). The court agrees. … v. Massachusetts Comm’n Against Discrimination, 441 Mass. 632, 637 (2004), quoting Dahill v. Police Dep’t of Boston, 434 Mass. 233, 237 (2001).

Penate v. Kaczmarek

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 17, 2022

Pursuant to the Rules of the Board of Bar Overseers, the Board must now review the case, at which time it may adopt the findings of the SHO or revise any findings which it determines to be erroneous, “paying due respect … Thus, it would make no difference to the finality analysis if the Board’s decision were on appeal. 4 Plaintiff also cites to Chase Manhattan Mortg. Corp. v.

Walters v. Boston City Council

District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 8, 2023

In April 2022, the Board of Election Commissioners adjusted voting precinct boundaries, increasing the number of precincts in the city from 255 to 275. … Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. 285, 306 (2017) (quoting Growe v. Emison, 507 U.S. 25, 41 (1993)).

United States v. Zygarowski

724 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 27, 1989

As the inspectors passed the Ford Bronco which the defendant had driven to the post office, they observed a brown paper parcel, now empty, in which the videocassette had been mailed. Id. … In Daury v.

Strahan v. Linnon

967 F. Supp. 581 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 20, 1997

Although most vessels in violation may be boarded, commercial whale watching boats are not to be boarded. Id. at 8. … Brown, 643 F.2d 835, 857-58 (1st Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds sub nom., Weinberger v.

Krick v. Raytheon Company

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 29, 2023

Stalcup’s FOIA litigation also suggests that the FBI interfered with the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) investigation. [Id. at ¶¶ 84- 92]. … Cir. 1999) that pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 1154, “the statute means what it says: No part of the Board’s actual report is admissible as evidence in a civil suit.” Fleming v. Robinson Aviation (RVA), Inc., No.

United States v. Perez

46 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 8, 1999

See United States v. Rivera, 971 F.2d 876 (2d Cir.1992); United States v. Wiggins, 905 F.2d 51 (4th Cir.1990); United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. … In an unpublished decision, United States v. Brown, 1996 WL 283313 (1st Cir.