Case law

Aubuchon v. Barnhart

403 F. Supp. 2d 152 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 23, 2005

Accord Chelte v. Apfel, 76 F.Supp.2d 104, 108 (D.Mass.1999). … Arnault v. Shalala, 1995 WL 599224 , at *2 (D.N.H. Aug.3, 1995).

Kiley v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Rhode Island

853 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 13, 1994

Board of Trustees, 973 F.2d 968, 970 (1st Cir.1992) (arbitrary and capricious standard used in ERISA breach of fiduciary action); Curtis v. … See Leahy v. The Bon, Inc., 801 F.Supp. 529, 539 (D.Utah 1992); cf. Luby v.

Diosa-Ortiz v. Ashcroft

334 F. Supp. 2d 27 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 21, 2004

See Wang v. … Moin v.

Kahriman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

115 F. Supp. 3d 153 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 14, 2015

See Kvorjak v. … Brown, 900 F.Supp. 567, 572-73 (D.Mass.1995) (“the First Circuit adheres to a more lenient standard under which an employee need only prove that a reasonable person would have resigned..as a result of workplace conditions

Monahan Corp. N v. v. Whitty

319 F. Supp. 2d 227 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 1, 2004

Hanna v. … It was only after that latter unopposed motion was allowed, at a time when all appellate rights vis' a vis that final and separate judgment had virtually gone by the boards in terms of temporal deadlines, 14 that defendants

Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund v. Nomura Asset Acceptance Corp.

658 F. Supp. 2d 299 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 30, 2009

See Gustafson v. … See, e.g., Suna v.

Reinoso Pichardo v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 30, 2021

Corp. v Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … V. The Request for a Stay Will Be Transferred to the Court of Appeals Pro se submissions are subject “to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Haines v.

Oberg v. City of Taunton

972 F. Supp. 2d 174 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 25, 2013

occurred.” 186 The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has long held that the “power to remove an officer ... is of an executive or administrative nature rather than of a judicial, nature.” 187 Collins upheld the power of a board … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (“We have consistently refused to hold municipalities liable under a theory of respondeat superior.”); Monell v. Dep’t of Soc.

Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Preston

472 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 30, 2007

Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822, 829 , 122 S.Ct. 2559 , 153 L.Ed.2d 735 (2002). … Smook v. Minnehaha County, 457 F.3d 806, 810 (8th Cir.2006) (quoting Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. at 829 , 122 S.Ct. 2559 ); N.G. v. Connecticut, 382 F.3d 225, 231 (2d Cir.2004) (same).

Ciolino v. Keystone Shipping Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 1, 2024

Brown v. KFC Corp., No. 05-11167-MBB, 2007 WL 7055476, at *4 (D. Mass. Mar. 19, 2007). The Court, therefore, denies the motion to strike Dr. Quadri’s expert testimony on this alternative basis. C. … Evid. 803(8)(A); see In 5-80”), published on March 13, 1980, states, “[a]ll vessels have some asbestos insulation material on board.” D. 93-3 at 2.

Jane Doe 1 v. Jetblue Airways Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 3, 2021

After boarding their return flight to Newark, Jane Doe #1 discussed the previous night with Jane Doe # 3. [Id. ¶ 19]. They were both stunned by what had happened. [Id.]. … Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011)).

Mangianfico v. Stanton

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 2019

Bradbury v. GMAC Mortg., LLC, 780 F.Supp.2d 108, 113 (D. Me. 2011); see Davison v. … Brown v. Newberger, 291 F.3d 89, 94 (1st Cir. 2002) (quotation omitted).

United States v. Anderson

229 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 23, 2002

See, e.g., United States v. Sebaggala, 256 F.3d 59 (1st Cir.2001); United States v. Beras, 183 F.3d 22 (1st Cir.1999); United States v. Fernandez-Ventura, 132 F.3d 844 (1st Cir.1998); United States v. … See, e.g., Scungio, 255 F.3d at 13 (investigation related to bribery of members of Board of Tax Assessment Review); United States v.

Lydon v. Local 103, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

965 F. Supp. 2d 178 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 17, 2013

In February, 2012 plaintiff filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) which was denied. B. … Haley v. City of Boston, 657 F.3d 39, 46 (1st Cir.2011). B.

Washington v. Milton Bradley Co.

340 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 8, 2004

See Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). … See Proud v.

Ryan v. Alzaim

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 8, 2021

Massachusetts); (3) John DeSousa (engineer licensed in Massachusetts); (4) Brian Hickox (real estate broker licensed in Massachusetts); (5) Leonard Copeland (condominium association officer); (6) Sea N Sand Condominium Board … He complains that the Defendants failed to notify “past and current unit owners that said falsified documents were used at any time, thus negating any ‘fiduciary responsibility’ that said legal counsel and the Board of

Haefeli v. Paul Chernoff

394 F. Supp. 1079 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 22, 1975

Commonwealth v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 447 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). See Wilwording v. Swenson, 404 U.S. 249 , 92 S.Ct. 407 , 30 L.Ed.2d 418 (1971).

United States v. Rodriguez

931 F. Supp. 907 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 18, 1996

Id. at 1087 (quoting United States v. Brown, 925 F.2d 1301, 1304 (10th Cir.1991)). … V.

Turner v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 30, 2022

The Plan states that Liberty Mutual, through its board of directors or a committee of that board, has the right to “amend or modify the Plan” at “any time,” as long as any amendment or modification does not “prejudice … Mesnick v. Gen. Elec. Co., 950 F.2d 816, 822 (1st Cir. 1991) (quoting Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc., 895 F.2d 46, 50 (1st Cir. 1990)).

Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.

825 F. Supp. 361 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 21, 1993

Board of Ed., 611 F.2d 624 , 639 (6th Cir.1979) (“reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the attorney” properly included in the § 1988 “attorney’s fee” award)). … In Deary v.