Case law

Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Omega Flex, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 28, 2021

Id. at 96; see also Harrison v. … Inc. v. KLT Indus., Inc., 2014 WL 5320174, at *3 (D.

Turley v. Zivkovich

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 5, 2018

No. 136 at ¶ 148.Hewas later required to write the Academy’s use of force model on the board “every day during his lunch break.” … Of the County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S.397, 410 (1997).

Walsh Construction Company v. Demtech, LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 3, 2020

(internal quotation marks omitted); Braga v. … While it is true that “a bailee properly may delegate to another the performance of the services required with respect to the bailed property,” Little, Brown & Co. (Inc.) v. Am. Paper Recycling Corp., 824 F.

Pettit v. AngioDynamics, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 2021

where the corporation maintains its headquarters—provided that the headquarters is the actual center of direction, control, and coordination . . . and not simply an office where the corporation holds its board … Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 133 n.11 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)).

Metrom Rail, LLC v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and Piper Networks, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 8, 2025

Co., Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for W. … Cir. 2013); see also Landis v. N. Am.

Satchi v. Rheon U.S.A., Inc.

255 F. Supp. 3d 253 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 12, 2017

Both engineers conclude “[tjhe board in-feed conveyor was part of the Rheon line .... ” Corliss Aff. ¶ 8; Mroszcyzk Aff. ¶ 7; See also Def. … Lohnes v. Level 3 Communs., Inc., 272 F.3d 49, 50 (1st Cir. 2001); Noonan v. Staples, Inc., 556 F.3d 20, 25 (1st Cir. 2009).

Polaino v. Bayer Corp.

122 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 13, 2000

See Rotman v. … He is certified by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene in the Chemical Aspects of Industrial Hygiene. Dr.

Lopez v. United States

349 F. Supp. 2d 179 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 20, 2004

Declaration of Debra Browne, Attachment, Article III ¶¶ 2-3, # 6. … V.

Kaul, MD v. Boston Partners, Inc

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 30, 2021

Co. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for W. … Kaul sent to the Executive Director of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine, it appears as though Mr.

Bourguignon v. MacDonald

667 F. Supp. 2d 175 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 30, 2009

See Winkler v. Horgan, 629 F.Supp.2d 159 (D.Mass.2009) (Saris, J.); Madrane v. Hogan, 520 F.Supp.2d 654, 669 (M.D.Pa.2007); Martinez v. Gonzales, 504 F.Supp.2d 887 (C.D.Cal.2007); Parlak v. … Lawrence v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 221, 227 (1st Cir.2006); see also Ponta-Garcia v. Byron, 08-cv-30005-MAP (D.Mass. Apr. 25, 2008); Osumah v. MacDonald, 08-cv-30007-MAP (D.Mass. Apr. 3, 2008); Charles v.

McMann v. Doe

460 F. Supp. 2d 259 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 31, 2006

The appearance of a person in a public place necessarily involves doffing the cloak of privacy which the law protects.” 50 Publishing a description of business activity, describing a posting made on a public message board … See Gertz v.

Booten v. United States

95 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 3, 2000

In Wozniak v. … Turcotte, 494 F.2d at 178 (citing Brown v. Church of Holy Name of Jesus, 105 R.I. 322 , 252 A.2d 176, 180 (1969)).

Rose v. Baystate Medical Center, Inc.

985 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 25, 1997

Desrosiers, 885 F.Supp. at 312 (citing Sabree, 921 F.2d at 402 and quoting Berry v. Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971, 980 (5th Cir.1983)). … See Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.1986); Scott v. Schweiker, 702 F.2d 13, 14 (1st Cir.1983); United States v.

United States v. Birkett

501 F. Supp. 2d 269 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 21, 2007

The Statutory Maximum After Rita v. United States In United States v. … Nov. 9, 2005); United States v. Dicicco, Crim. A. No. 04-10005-WGY (D.Mass. Feb. 3, 2005); United States v. Brown, Crim. A. No. 04-10225-WGY (Jan. 31, 2005).

Brent S. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 19, 2019

Defendant denied coverage for Jake’s treatment at Ashcreek Ranch because it was “a residential treatment [sic] and boarding school” and thus “not a covered type of provider” under Plaintiffs’ plan. [Id. ¶ 37]. … and board charges from Ashcreek Ranch qualify for coverage under the plan; (ii) Plaintiffs fail to allege a violation of ERISA based on the denial of benefits because, even in the absence of the Recreational Exclusion,

Dillon Boiler Services Company, Inc. v. Soundview Vermont Holdings LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 29, 2019

Cossart, 804 F.3d at 20 (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … V. 163 Pleasant Street Corp., 960 F.2d 1080, 1091 (1st Cir. 1992); see also Escude Cruz v.

Wolfson v. American Airlines, Inc.

170 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 2001

Co. v. … Comair, Inc., 134 F.3d 254, 259 (4th Cir.1998) (holding that intentional tort claims were not preempted to extent they did not relate to airlines’ decision to deny passenger permission to board); Abdu-Brisson v.

Western Sea Fishing Co., Inc. v. Locke

722 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 13, 2010

Inc., F/V Voyager, Inc., F/V Challenger, Inc., F/V Endeavour, Inc., and Cape Clam, Inc. … (quoting Alliance Against IFQs v. Brown, 84 F.3d 343, 350 (9th Cir.1996)).

Matos v. Astrue

795 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 7, 2011

Doyle v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 144 F.3d 181, 184 (1st Cir.1998). … Gonzalez Perez v.

Drexler v. Tel Nexx, Inc.

125 F. Supp. 3d 361 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 28, 2015

Drexler would be “eligible for a bonus for up to 10% of his base salary based on his performance and company profit” subject to the Board of Directors’ approval. Mr. … In Webster v.