Case law

Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.

825 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 11, 1993

Browning-Ferris Indus., 845 F.2d 404 (2nd Cir.1988), aff'd, 492 U.S. 257 , 109 S.Ct. 2909 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989). … V.

Doe v. Wentworth Institute of Technology, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 3, 2022

Wills v. Brown Univ., 184 F.3d 20, 26 (1st Cir. 1999). … Mangla v. Brown Univ., 135 F.3d 80, 83 (1st Cir. 1998) (citing Russell v. Salve Regina College, 938 F.2d 315, 316 (1st Cir. 1991)).

Hernandez v. Ashe

745 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 13, 2010

See Whitley v. … Brown v. United States, 557 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir.2009). Accord Brush v. Jiminy Peak Mtn. Resort, Inc., 626 F.Supp.2d 139, 147 (D.Mass. 2009).

P.L.A.Y., Inc. v. Nike, Inc.

1 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 24, 1998

Tuttle v. Metz Co., 229 Mass. 272 , 118 N.E. 291 (1918). See also Lipson v. Adelson, 17 Mass.App.Ct. 90 , 456 N.E.2d 470, 471 (1983); Poskus v. … Not only did NIKE agree to multiple performance obligations, but unlike a unilaterally-based executory accord, PLAY agreed to designate a NIKE representative to its Board of Directors and committed to not using any other

Catrone v. Ogden Suffolk Downs, Inc.

683 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 11, 1988

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 540 (1962). … In England v.

Reich v. U.S. Department of Energy

784 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 17, 2011

In Gilmore v. … See Kissinger v.

United States v. Patel

524 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 27, 2007

Brown v. Warden, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 682 F.2d 348, 349 (2d Cir.1982). 45 . See, e.g., United States v. Cockrell, 1997 WL 1876542, *2, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23467 at *5-6 (M.D. Ala. … United States v.

Shurtleff v. City of Boston

District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 3, 2019

V. … In considering the design, the Board sought public comments. Id. at 2245.

State Street Trust Co. v. Hassett

45 F. Supp. 671 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 12, 1942

The merger contract was made subject to the ratification and approval of the directors and shareholders of each corporation, the Commissioner of Banks of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and of *673 the Board of Governors … As the court said in Burnet v.

United States v. Boliero

923 F. Supp. 2d 319 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 13, 2013

In United States v. … United States v.

Continental Bank, National Ass'n v. Village of Ludlow

777 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 31, 1991

Co. v. … Norman v. Brown, Todd & Heyburn, 693 F.Supp. 1259, 1262 (D.Mass.1988) (Skinner, J.) (citing authorities). This Court likewise refuses to do so.

Goulet v. Carpenters District Council of Boston & Vicinity

884 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 28, 1994

Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1, 10 , 77 S.Ct. 598, 603 , 1 L.Ed.2d 601 (1957). … In Condon v.

Picard

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 5, 2026

Brown v. Gov’t of D.C., 390 F. Supp. 3d 114, 123 (D.D.C. 2019). “Thus, courts typically do not reach the merits of a First Amendment challenge at the motion-to-dismiss stage.” Id. … (cleaned up)); accord Brown, 390 F.

Agresti v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

631 F. Supp. 1245 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 1986

Cotter v. … Rodriguez v. Secretary of HHS, 647 F.2d 218, 223-224 (1st Cir.1981); Browne v. Richardson, 468 F.2d 1003, 1006 (1st Cir.1972). It should not, however, form the sole basis for the Secretary’s decision. Rodriguez v.

Godinez v. Alere Inc.

272 F. Supp. 3d 201 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 23, 2017

Morgan as financial advisor to Alere’s board regarding potential corporate transactions. … Four days later, the Alere board- authorized J.P. Morgan to contact other potential acquirers. On January 11, 2016, Alere presented at a J.P.

Rolland v. Cellucci

106 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 28, 2000

Rather, the court believes that a ten percent across the board reduction adequately eliminates the duplication that it has discovered, examples of which are described above. … See Missouri v.

Roberts v. Crowley

538 F. Supp. 2d 413 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 6, 2008

See Horvath v. … Sheppard v. River Valley Fitness One, L.P., 428 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.2005) (quoting U.S. v. Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d 1, 30 (1st Cir.2004)).

Oliveira Dos Reis v. Vitello

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 8, 2025

See Hernandez- Lara v. … See Reid v. Donelan, 17 F.4th 1, 9 (1st Cir. 2021).

Ross v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 11, 2021

Airframe Sys., Inc. v. … Mulrain v. Board of Selectmen of Town of Leiscester, 944 F.2d 23, 25 (1st Cir.1991). Thus, the Court need not parse which law governs for both yield the same outcome.

Chase v. United States Postal Service

149 F. Supp. 3d 195 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 1, 2016

at Chase that “there’s a job posted on the bulletin board for any injury compénsation specialist since you’re the biggest fraud when it comes to injuries.” … Hodgens v. Gen.