Case law

John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.

94 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 2, 1999

Citing Clegg v. Butler, 424 Mass. 413 , 676 N.E.2d 1134 (1997), Flattery v. Gregory, 397 Mass. 143 , 489 N.E.2d 1257, 1260 (1986), Leardi v. Brown, 394 Mass. 151 , 474 N.E.2d 1094 (1985), and Van Dyke v. St. … Turnpike Motors, Inc. v. Newbury Group, Inc., 596 N.E.2d at 993 ; O’Blenes v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Lynn, 492 N.E.2d at 356 ; see, e.g., Kahn v.

Black v. Astrue

729 F. Supp. 2d 474 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 30, 2010

The Decision Review Board denied Black’s request for review on March 17, 2009, and adopted the decision of the hearing officer as the Commissioner’s final decision. Id. at 1-5. … Johnson v. Bowen, 817 F.2d 983, 986 (2d Cir.1987).

Stokes v. Saga International Holidays, Ltd.

218 F.R.D. 6 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 21, 2003

See Kiely v. Raytheon Co., 105 F.3d 734, 735 (1st Cir. 1997)(per curiam); Garita Hotel L.P. v. Ponce Fed. Bank, F.S.B., 958 F.2d 15, 17 (1st Cir.1992). Gorski v. … The unfair competition statutes permit suit to be brought by “any board, ... or by any person acting for the interests of itself, its members or the general public” commenced within four years after the cause of action accrued

The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Boston

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 31, 2023

In Bormuth v. … This case is unlike Williamson v. Brevard County, which found that a county board’s selection process rendered its legislative prayer practice unconstitutional. 928 F.3d at 1314-15.

Britell v. United States

150 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 16, 2001

Baker v. … Harris v.

Hebert v. Vantage Travel Service, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 24, 2021

Salvas v. … V.

United States v. Clifford (In Re Clifford)

255 B.R. 258 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 21, 2000

See Ghandour v. United States, No. 97-5062, 1997 WL 716143 , at *1, 132 F.2d 52 (Fed.Cir. Nov. 17, 1997) (unpublished); United States v. Jones, 33 F.3d 1137, 1139 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. … Running 7 F.3d 1293, 1297 (7th Cir.1993); Raba v. United States, 977 F.2d 941 , 943 (5th Cir.1992); Donelan Phelps & Co. v. United States, 876 F.2d 1373 , 1374 n. 2 (8th Cir.1989); Williams Indus. v.

Gammons v. Massachusetts Department of Housing & Community Development

523 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 28, 2007

Monroe v. … See Brown v. Hot, Sexy & Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525 , 536 & n. 9 (1st Cir.1995). 8 . For the above reasons defendants claim that the doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes the instant litigation is mistaken.

United States Ex Rel. O'Keeffe v. Sverdup Corp.

131 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 31, 2001

Barth v. … Ill, § 10.2, FA-8, pp. 1-2, ¶ 2), the Town of Middleborough’s Planning Board (Id. at § 10.5, LA-3, p. 3, ¶ 12), the Town of Braintree (Id. at § 10.5, LA-19, p. 5, ¶ 22), and the Chairman of the Office of the Planning Board

Cabral v. Sullivan

757 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 19, 1991

Libby, McNeil and Libby Corp. v. Alaska Industrial Board, 215 F.2d 781, 782 (9th Cir.1954). … In Kotteakos v.

Javier

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 3, 2026

See Brown, 596 U.S. at 136; Parker v. Matthews, 567 U.S. 37, 48–49 (2012) (per curiam) (“[C]ircuit precedent does not constitute ‘clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court[.]’ … Brown, 596 U.S. at 144 (alterations in original) (quoting Renico v. Lett, 559 U.S. 766, 776 (2010)).

McKinney v. National Dairy Council

491 F. Supp. 1108 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 28, 1980

Thus, in Wehr v. … Molinar v.

Robles Soto v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 19, 2019

Brown were low back pain, hip pain, childhood Perthes disease, facet syndrome, and right knee pain (A.R. 909). Dr. Brown reviewed Plaintiff’s medical history with him and examined him. … See Brown v. Colvin, 111 F. Supp. 3d 89, 101 (D.

Cashman v. Shalala

817 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 1993

whether the report of a non-examining medical advisor can constitute substantial evidence "will doubtlessly vary with the circumstances, including the nature of the illness and the information provided to the expert”); Browne … v.

Gandor v. Torus National Insurance

140 F. Supp. 3d 141 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 2015

Chesterton Co. v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund, 445 Mass. 502 , 838 N.E.2d 1237, 1250 (2005) (quoting Trustees of Tufts Univ. v. Commercial Union Ins. … The injury here as stated by Attorney Lowenstein is incorrect in his assessment that any misstep by him caused you damage or that the [Zoning Board of Appeal] decision could have been overturned by the filing of the case

United States v. Commonwealth of Mass.

724 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2010

The operator must log the lookout’s name and duty hours and maintain a record of the crew on board during towing. Id. … Ray, 435 U.S. at 178 , 98 S.Ct. 988 (quoting Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 767, 774 , 67 S.Ct. 1026 , 91 L.Ed. 1234 (1947)).

Big & Tall of America, Inc. v. Den Norske Bank (In re Big & Tall of America, Inc.)

167 B.R. 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 29, 1994

The newly elected “boards” then passed respective resolutions ostensibly placing both Big and Shoppes under the bankruptcy court’s protection. … Trust Nat’l Bank v.

Kelley v. United States

27 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 24, 1939

Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U.S. 445 , 50 S.Ct. 202 , 74 L.Ed. 538 , 67 A.L.R. 1010 ; Francisco Sugar Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 47 F.2d 555, 557 ; Finance & Guaranty Co. v. … Crowell v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 62 F.2d 51 ; United States v. Anderson, 269 U.S. 422 , 46 S.Ct. 131 , 70 L.Ed. 347 ; United States v. Mitchell, 271 U.S. 9 , 46 S.Ct. 418 , 70 L.Ed. 799 ; Wickwire v.

Mompoint v. Department of Elementary & Secondary Education

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 30, 2019

This allegation arises from comments posted on a “staff recognition board” that Peske implemented for her unit. Id. Peske posted compliments about members of the staff weekly. Id. … At most, she alleges her colleagues saw on the staff recognition board that her work was “good,” rather than “great.” Mompoint does not allege that any damages resulted.

Lima v. Post Consumer Brands, LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 2, 2019

See In re Quaker Oats Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal Litig., No. 16-cv-1442, 2017 WL 4676585, at *5 (C.D. Cal. … Oct. 10, 2017) (analyzing the complaint to determine whether plaintiffs had alleged that “maple & brown sugar” was a flavor or a sweetener).