Case law

Deguio v. United States

732 F. Supp. 1240 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 1990

Follansbee v. Ohse, 293 Mass. 48, 52 , 199 N.E. 387 (1935) (quoting Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp., 267 Mass. 501, 516 , 167 N.E. 235 (1929)); Perry v. … See Interstate Busses Corp. v.

Roy v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 7, 2020

In Gilliand, the plaintiff bus drivers and attendants initially sued the School Board and the companies with which the School Board contracted to provide bus services alleging that the defendants' failure to pay overtime … After the School Board was dismissed from the suit, the defendant bus companies moved to dismiss on the ground that the School Board was a required and indispensable party. See id. at *1.

Genzyme Corp. v. Federal Insurance

657 F. Supp. 2d 282 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 2009

Effectively, the loss — if any — was imposed on Biosurgery Division shareholders as soon as the board of directors’ firm intention to follow through with the Share Exchange was announced. … Puerto Rico v.

Megitt v. Indymac Bank, F.S.B.

547 F. Supp. 2d 56 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2008

(“TILA”), the implementing Federal Reserve Board Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 , et seq. (“Regulation Z”), and TILA’s state counterpart, the Massachusetts Consumer Cost Disclosure Act (“MCCDA”), Mass. Gen. … See also McKenna v.

Nachbaur v. Mahoney

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 6, 2024

This is a shareholder derivative action brought on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation against its Board of Directors and certain of its executive officers alleging various breaches of fiduciary duties and violations … Nixon v Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978); see also Alchem USA Inc. v. Cage, 2022 WL 3043153 (3d Cir. 2022); Deherrera v.

Gentili v. Sturbridge

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 10, 2021

According to the Massachusetts Bar Association’s website, Plaintiff (Board of Bar Overseers #189060) is a retired member of the state bar. … Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 444 Mass. 837, 843 (Mass. 2005) (citing Heacock v. Heacock, 402 Mass. 21, 23 n. 2, 520 N.E.2d 151 (1988).

Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 12, 2022

Droplets, Inc. v. … Hollmer v.

Pollini v. Raytheon Disability Employee Trust

54 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 11, 1999

MetLife cites Pokol v. E.I. … See Nguyen v. Chater, 172 F.3d 31 (1st Cir.1999).

United States v. Matta-Timmins

81 F. Supp. 2d 193 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 3, 2000

See Caplin & Drysdale Chartered v. … See Davis v.

Hussey v. East Coast Slurry Co., LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 1, 2022

She was further advised to attend a meeting on August 27, 2019 with the School’s board of trustees. Id. … LEXIS 144335, at *23 (quoting Beal v. Board of Selectmen of Hingham, 646 N.E.2d 131, 138 n.5 (Mass. 1995)); see Bourbeau, 445 F. Supp. 2d at 114.

Yaghoobi v. Tufts Medical Center

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 11, 2024

See Cok v. … See e.g., Noonan v.

Gil v. VORTEX, LLC

697 F. Supp. 2d 234 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 25, 2010

See Dahill v. … Gil Opp’n at 9, citing Dartt v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc.

Wallace v. Reno

24 F. Supp. 2d 104 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 7, 1998

Co. v. … Dion v.

United States v. Ramos

591 F. Supp. 2d 93 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 29, 2008

Board of County Comm’rs, 837 F.Supp. 338 , 344 (D.Colo.1993) (“While race is an appropriate characteristic for identifying a particular suspect, it is wholly inappropriate to define a class of suspects.”); People v. … See United States v. Brown, 500 F.3d 48, 56-57 (1st Cir.2007) (Terry stop can generate enough evidence to provide probable cause for warrantless arrest).

Rodgers v. CALLAWAY GOLF OPERATIONS, INC.

796 F. Supp. 2d 232 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 10, 2011

L. ch. 151B is actually a claim arising under Sections 7 or 8 of the NLRA and, therefore, jurisdiction vests exclusively with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). See San Diego Building and Trades Council v. … See Beddall v. State St.

Goldman v. Winn

565 F. Supp. 2d 200 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 1, 2008

In re Pratt, 462 F.3d 14, 21 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting Lamphere v. Brown Univ., 798 F.2d 532, 536 (1st Cir.1986) for this definition); see also Buildex Incorporated v. … Goldman was thirty-two years old and had light brown hair, which he wore in a large “Afro” style.

MacNeil v. Astrue

908 F. Supp. 2d 259 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 8, 2012

Because the Decision Review Board (“DRB”) did not act on the Commissioner’s decision within the allotted 90-day period, the ALJ’s decision became final. … See Anderson v. Astrue, 682 F.Supp.2d 89, 97 (D.Mass.2010).

Rae v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts MBTA

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 22, 2021

Dkt. 45-3 at 44; see Wojcik v. … The Court accordingly ALLOWS the motion for summary judgment on Count V. V.

Rothman v. Office Environments of New England Health & Welfare Benefit Plan

794 F. Supp. 2d 276 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 10, 2011

Margaret O’Connor, a neurologist who is Board Certified in Clinical Neuropsychology, performed an independent neurological exam of Rothman for more than six hours. … For example, in Leahy v.

StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 30, 2024

Corbett v. Browning, 2024 WL 862160, at *3 (D. Mass. Feb. 13, 2024). F.3d 67, 72-73 (1st Cir. 2007), quoting Davis v. Monroe Cnty. … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997). “[A] claim that an institution could or should have done more does not establish deliberate indifference.” M.L. ex rel. D.L. v. Concord Sch.