Case law

Bell v. Hampden County District Attorney Office

District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 7, 2025

Martinez v. Petrenko, 792 F.3d 173, 179 (1st Cir. 2015 (quoting Ruiz Rivera v. Pfizer Pharm., LLC, 521 F.3d 76, 84 (1st Cir. 2008)); see also Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … See Virginia Off. for Prot. & Advocacy v. Stewart, 563 U.S. 247, 253 (2011).1 (“A]bsent waiver or valid abrogation, federal courts may not entertain a private person’s suit against a State.”); Brown v.

Moss-Rosenberg Verft, A/S v. General Dynamics Corp.

78 F.R.D. 55 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 30, 1977

See Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 368 U.S. 464, 472-73 , 82 S.Ct. 486 , 7 L.Ed.2d 458 (1962); Hahn v. … Peckham v. Ronrico Corp., 171 F.2d 653, 657 (1st Cir. 1948).

Vardakas v. American DG Energy, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 2, 2018

Ganem v. … See Ocasio-Hernandez v.

Curran v. City of Boston

777 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 14, 1991

Stillwater Board of Realtors, 578 F.2d 1319 , 1321 *120 (10th Cir.1977) (discussing procedure relevant to a motion to dismiss); Mitchell v. … See Andujar v.

United States v. Goldfine

169 F. Supp. 93 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 19, 1958

V read into evidence during the re-direct ■examination of William L. Donovan.] It was during this same summer season that Agent Patrick J. … Reference at that time was made to United Mine Workers v. United States, 330 U.S. 258 , 67 S.Ct. 677 , 91 L.Ed. 884 .

ARMERY v. Potter

497 F. Supp. 2d 134 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 24, 2007

Mesnick v. General Elec. Co., 950 F.2d 816, 822 (1st Cir.1991) (quoting Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc., 895 F.2d 46, 50 (1st Cir.1990)). … See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(e); see also Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). Accordingly, she was required to file her civil action by May 12, 2005.

Healy v. Henderson

275 F. Supp. 2d 40 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 7, 2003

In Brown v. Gen. Servs. … Gillen v.

Paris Medicine Co. v. Brewer & Co.

17 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 23, 1936

Wolf Bros. & Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. (C.C.A.) 206 F. 611 ; Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. v. National Aluminum Works (D.C.) 226 F. 815 ; Notaseme Hosiery Co. v. Straus (C.C.A.) 201 F. 99 . … McLean v. Fleming, supra; Menendez v. Holt, 128 U.S. 514 , 9 S.Ct. 143 , 32 L.Ed. 526 ; Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co., supra.

Reid v. Donelan

991 F. Supp. 2d 275 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 9, 2014

Plaintiff appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). While his immigration case was pending, Plaintiff filed a motion with the IJ requesting a bond re-determination hearing. … See Ortega v. Hodgson, No. 11-cv-10358-MBB, 2011 WL 4103138 (D.Mass. Sept. 13, 2011) (Bowler, Mag. J.); Flores-Powell v. Chadbourne, 677 F.Supp.2d 455 (D.Mass.2010) (Wolf, J.); Sengkeo v.

Jefferson Insurance v. Roberts

349 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 2, 2004

See Anderson v. … See e.g., Alternative System Concepts, Inc. v.

Cryer v. Massachusetts Department of Correction

763 F. Supp. 2d 237 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 7, 2011

Johnson v. Board of Bar Overseers of Mass., 324 F.Supp.2d 276, 286 (D.Mass.2004) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). … American Lithuanian Naturalization Club, Athol, Mass., Inc. v. Board of Health of Athol, 446 Mass. 310, 313-314 , 844 N.E.2d 231, 235 (2006) (footnotes omitted).

Forsythe v. Sun Life Financial, Inc.

475 F. Supp. 2d 122 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 22, 2007

See, e.g., Daily Income Fund v. Fox, 464 U.S. 523 , 526 n. 2, 104 S.Ct. 831 , 78 L.Ed.2d 645 (1984); Green v. Nuveen Advisory Corporation, 295 F.3d 738, 743 (7th Cir.2002); King v. … See, e.g., Kahn v.

Bruce v. Weekly World News, Inc.

203 F.R.D. 51 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 11, 2001

WWN’s first argument is based on Fantasy, Inc. v. … While the Copyright Act does not offer a crystal-clear definition of what is meant by the term “prevailing party,” in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v.

Insurance Co. of North America v. Protection Mutual Insurance

939 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 9, 1996

In 1994, however, Good Samaritan’s board of directors determined to reevaluate its insurance program with an eye toward consolidating its coverage under a single insurer. … Co. v. Security Mutual Ins.

Holland v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.

100 F. Supp. 2d 53 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 1999

Such use of medical devices for non-approved purposes has traditionally been regulated by the hospitals in which physicians practice and by their state medical boards, not by FDA. Bierhans Aff., Ex. 40 at 2. … Commonwealth v. Blackstone Valley Elec. Co., 67 F.3d 981, 986 (1st Cir.1995). In this case, the plaintiff’s response to the defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (Dkt.

Henry v. Hodgson

District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 16, 2018

DesRosiers v. Moran, 949 F.2d at 24; see Weir v. … Brown v. Ross County, No. 14-333, 2014 WL 4284874, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2014). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1.

Alarcon

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 17, 2025

Yet, Respondents also concede that this case is materially similar” to Doe v. Moniz, __ F. Supp. 3d __, 2025 WL 2576819 (D. Mass. … The Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision in Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025), is unpersuasive and does not change the analysis.

First Commodity Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

644 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 31, 1986

Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 551 F.2d 1270, 1279-80 (D.C.Cir.1977); accord, e.g., Public Utilities Commissioner of Oregon v. … Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v.

Picard v. Buoniconti

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 8, 2023

Republic of Argentina v. NML Cap., Ltd., 573 U.S. 134, 138 (2014). Pursuant to Fed. R. … ClearOne Commc'ns, Inc. v. Chiang, 276 F.R.D. 402, 404 (D. Mass. 2011) (quoting United States v. Neumann, No. 86–cv–0034, 1999 WL 156151, at *1 (D. Mass. Mar. 5, 1999)). Further, under Fed. R. Civ.

Franklin Process Co. v. Hoosac Mills Corporation

8 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 19, 1934

United States v. Grimaud, 220 U. S. 506 , 31 S. Ct. 480 , 55 L. Ed. 563 . The result of this tendency has been a vast accumulation of administrative law, so-called, applied by boards, commissions, and officials. … Wallace, supra, the court refused to uphold the law involved, there was dicta in the opinion indicating that if Congress had from the evidence before it regarded that the sales for future delivery on a board of trade directly