Case law

Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. Sweet

62 F. Supp. 2d 282 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 16, 1999

It is governed by a self-perpetuating Board of Trustees that consists of representatives from each of the member universities. See Dkt. #81, Ex. 1; id., Ex. 4 at v. B. … See Kauffman v. Anglo-American Sch. Of Sofia, 28 F.3d 1223, 1224 (D.C.Cir.1994). In Kauffman , the plaintiff sued a private school after its governing board fired him from his position as the school’s director. See id.

STATE POLICE FOR AUTOMATIC RETIREMENT v. Difava

164 F. Supp. 2d 141 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 5, 2001

Cotter v. … Schools v.

Richard v. BY MARCEL v. v. CITY OF MEDFORD

924 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 24, 1996

See Honig v. … But see Deborah V. v. Leonard, 1993 WL 393055 , at *1-2 (D.Mass.

In Re Air Crash Disaster at Boston, Massachusetts on July 31, 1973

399 F. Supp. 1106 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 21, 1975

authority for its application, the Vermont Supreme Court relied on decisions of New Hampshire, New York and Pennsylvania, all of which have abandoned the lex loci rule, 3 and the First Restatement of Conflicts, Goldman, supra; Brown … The decedents purchased their plane tickets in Vermont, boarded the aircraft in Vermont and expected to return to Vermont. The accident occurred in Massachusetts. Delta does business in both Massachusetts and Vermont.

McDonald v. Cape Cod Trawling Corporation

71 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 13, 1947

Plaintiff complains that the corporate employer failed to supply a reasonably safe place in which the decedent could work and that that failure was the cause of injuries to and the death of the decedent while he was a seaman on board … That, as Tun-stall v. Brotherhood, 323 U.S. 210, 213 , 65 S.Ct. 235 , 89 L.Ed. 187 and Peyton v.

Bailey v. Dart Container Corp. of Michigan

980 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 29, 1997

Bailey reiterated this statement when the examiner rejected application claims 13, 3 and 5 of the ’015 patent. 8 In an appeal to the Board of Appeals in the United States Patent and Trademark (“the Board of Appeals”), Bailey … B100185-B100186) and to the Board of Appeals after the final rejection (Docket Entry #60, Ex. 8, pp. B100209-B100210).

Soo v. Bone Biologics Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 13, 2021

Shortly thereafter, the Founders resigned from their positions on the Board (Drs. Wu and Soo) and Scientific Advisory Board (Dr. Ting). … Grajales v. P.R. Ports Auth., 682 F.3d 40, 44–45 (1st Cir. 2012) (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)).

Woodley v. Town of Nantucket

645 F. Supp. 1365 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 17, 1986

Voutour v. … V.

Diaz v. Jiten Hotel Management, Inc.

822 F. Supp. 2d 74 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 8, 2011

See id.; see also Maceira v. Pagan, 698 F.2d 38, 40 (1st Cir.1983); Chestnut v. Coyle, No. 99-10236, 2004 WL 438788 , at *3 (D.Mass. Mar. 09, 2004) (Zobel, J.); Horney v. … $495; James Krusky, $165.00; Ramon Suero, $332.50; Steezynska, Rogue, and Hernandez, $462.10; Oswaldo LopezVenagas, $225.00; interpreter $450; Maria Lopez, $243.00; Samya Yamin, $138.08; Rosita Morel, Telma Ebanks, Denise Brown

Barth v. City of Peabody

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 2018

In fiscal year (“FY”) 2010, the Board of Assessors of the City of Peabody (“the board of assessors”) assessed the land, which consisted of .042 acres, as worth $116,200 and the building as … authority of such board . . .

Cromwell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

483 B.R. 36 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 20, 2012

In the case of TILA, the Federal Reserve Board (“Board”) promulgated the regulations as 12 C.F.R. § 226.01 et seq., known as “Regulation Z”, through authority conferred by 15 U.S.C. *41 § 1604 (a). … Palmer v.

Shahzade v. Gregory

923 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 8, 1996

See United States v. Montas, 41 F.3d 775, 783 (1st Cir.1994). The proposed expert must qualify as an expert and must offer testimony relating to reliable scientific knowledge. Daubert v. … In a case raising the same issue, Isely v.

The Drill Boat No. 4

233 F. 589 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 1916

No. 3,939; Daniels v. Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co., 24 N. Y. 447 . … Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615, 623 , 13 Sup. Ct. 672, 37 L. Ed. 582 ; Consolidated Co. v. Knickerbocker, etc., Co., 200 Fed. 840 (D. C. Me.).

Boston's Children First v. City of Boston

62 F. Supp. 2d 247 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 10, 1999

Board of Comm’rs. of Miller County, 45 F.Supp.2d 1369, 1370 (M.D.Ga.1998); Eisenberg v. Montgomery County Public Schools, 19 F.Supp.2d 449, 451-52 (D.Md.1998) (Discussed infra. Section B.) … Tito v. Arlington County School Board, 1997 U.S. Dist.

Jones v. Bowen

679 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 10, 1988

Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 [1938]). … Richardson v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Happ

295 F. Supp. 2d 189 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 25, 2003

V. … SEC v.

Welch v. Paicos

26 F. Supp. 2d 244 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 22, 1998

Ass’n, Inc. v. … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 37, 40 (1996) (under ABA Model Rule 1.9(a), accepting alleged former client’s consent limited to the case at bar, and therefore declining to consider whether attorney was conflicted out); Hasco, Inc. v.

Norris v. Moroney

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 18, 2022

No. 1] against individual members of the Massachusetts Parole Board (“Board”), its attorneys, and various parole officers. On August 15, 2022, Norris filed a Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Doc. … See DesRosiers v. Moran, 949 F.2d 15, 23 (1st Cir. 1991).

IN RE: G.E. ERISA LITIGATION

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 30, 2019

Janak, John Slatner, and Chip Knight. 3 Defendants are General Electric Company (“GE”), GE Asset Management, Benefit Plan Investment Committee, GE Asset Management Committee, GE Pension Board, GE Board of Directors, GE … Id.; see also Velazquez v. Massachusetts Fin. Servs. Co., 320 F. Supp. 3d 252, 261 (D. Mass. 2018) (holding that monies paid out of a fund, rather than the plan, are not considered a plan asset); Fleming v.

Bellatty v. Barrett Mfg. Co.

192 F. 229 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 16, 1911

The man on the wharf was standing near the edge, with the barrel hooked on, ready to hoist on board, waiting for the tackle to be made ready. At this time Eitz, a teamster in the general employment of C. J. … Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 212 U. S. 215 , 29 Sup. Ct. 252, 53 L. Ed. 480 , and 152 Fed. 166 , 81 C. C. A. 399 .