Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,281 results
1.96s
Span East Airlines, Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp.
486 F. Supp. 831 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 28, 1980
41(b) Judge Freedman considered the defendants’ arguments and in his order of October 9, 1979 stated: “[T]his court is satisfied by the documentation supplied by Span East, consisting of the minutes of a meeting of its board … of directors, that Paul V.
Cited 10 timesPublishedFinnegan v. Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 13, 2024
Brown v. Suffolk Univ., No. 19-cv-40062-DHH, 2021 WL 2785047, at *3 (D. Mass. Mar. 31, 2021) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). … Brown, 2021 WL 2785047, at *4 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknown294 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 3, 1968
United States v. Mitchell, 369 F.2d 323 (2d Cir.). The motion to dismiss the indictment is again denied. … If the Government proves defendant intentionally refused to comply with an order of his draft board, in accordance with the statute, to submit to induction, it is not open to defendant to offer as an excuse that he regarded
Cited 10 timesPublished771 F. Supp. 2d 190 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 24, 2011
On August 24, 2004, Williams allegedly met with a hearing examiner from the Massachusetts Parole Board. (Id.). … V.
Cited 15 timesPublishedMcGrath v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
943 F. Supp. 95 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 21, 1996
McGrath boarded the second locomotive and crossed over to the cabin of locomotive number 2013. … See Rivera v. Union Pac. R.R.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFoisy v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance
241 F. Supp. 2d 65 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 24, 2002
Golber v. BayBank Valley Trust Co., 46 Mass.App. Ct. 256, 704 N.E.2d 1191, 1194 (1999) (quoting Glickman v. Brown, 21 Mass.App.Ct. 229 , 486 N.E.2d 737, 741 (1985), abrogated on other grounds by Cigal v. Leader Dev. … See Poly v.
Cited 6 timesPublished12 F. 217 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1882
I am of the opinion that the evidence sustains the allegations of. the respective libellants as to what took place on board their own vessels; *218 and that the Alfred A. did not luff, but kept off; and the Abby Ingalls did … Bentley v. Coyne, 4 Wall. 509 ; The Ontario, 2 Low. 40 , affirmed on appeal; Swift v. Brownell, 1 Holmes, 467 ; The Mary Doane, 2 Low. 428 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2021
Audette v. Town of Plymouth, 858 F.3d 13, 19 (1st Cir. 2017) (quoting Mulloy v. Acushnet Co., 460 F.3d 141, 145 (1st Cir. 2006)). … City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 385 (1989) (citing Monell v. N.Y. City Dept. of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694–95 (1978)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSutera v. Perrier Group of America, Inc.
986 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 29, 1997
Jacobson and Richard Irons, Ph.D., defendant’s expert, a board certified toxicologist. Dr. … City of Greenville v. W.R.
Cited 23 timesPublished596 F. Supp. 2d 138 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 6, 2009
Introduction Plaintiffs Marek Borkowski, Rufus Alfred Ayers, and Steven Wood bring this maritime action against Defendants F/V Madison Kate and F/V Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Sea Ventures, LLC (“Sea Ventures”). … Airlines, Inc. v. Transp.
Cited 0 timesPublished256 F. Supp. 3d 57 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 21, 2017
Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 , 125 S.Ct. 1432 , 161 L.Ed.2d 334 (2005) (citations omitted); see also Early v. … First, Pearson cites Miranda v.
Cited 0 timesPublished112 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 28, 2000
Rodrigue v. … Kelly v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSullivan v. Greenwood Credit Union
499 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 13, 2007
Corp. v. … See Barnhart v.
Cited 3 timesPublished118 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 19, 2000
Pendleton v. City of Haverhill, 156 F.3d 57, 67 (1st Cir.1998). … RKO General, Inc., 403 Mass. 779 , 532 N.E.2d 675, 681 (1989); Brown v. Hearst Corp., 54 F.3d 21, 27 (1st Cir.1995). Plaintiff concedes this point, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Count V is ALLOWED.
Cited 3 timesPublished8 F. Cas. 757 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 1, 1859
And the case of Brown v. Hunt, 11 Mass. 45 , and Locke v. Swan, 13 Mass. 76 , would amply justify the decision, if any authority would be needed. There are decisions, it is true, that have a different aspect. Byrne v. … The leading case in favor of the old law is Cutter v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedArkwright Corp. v. United States
53 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 14, 1943
When that tax was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. … In the majority of cases the taxpayer was to present his claim before a Board of-Review set up for that purpose.
Cited 2 timesPublished135 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 18, 1955
The case of Eastern Air Lines, Inc., v. … Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 551 , authorizes the Civil Aeronautics Board and the Administrator of Civil Aeronautics to prescribe: (a) (7).
Cited 7 timesPublished639 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 28, 1986
Defendants are the members of the Board of Bar Overseers of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts and Bar Counsel for the Board, the individuals charged with enforcing the Canons of Ethics and all disciplinary rules … In Colgrove v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedIn Re Extradition of Lui Kin-Hong
939 F. Supp. 934 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 29, 1996
.”); Peroff v. … The arrest warrant in this case mistakenly refers to "Brown and Williamson Limited,” a nonexistent coxporation, instead of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation.
Cited 9 timesPublishedTeva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 22, 2019
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions On August 8, 2018, Lilly filed six IPR petitions with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Board”) … The Board has instituted IPR proceedings for all nine Patents-in-Suit.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna