Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,024 results
1.39s
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 24, 2019
The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas clearly described the role of USDA-APHIS assessments as follows: APHIS … In addition, the “exhibitor shall establish and maintain programs of adequate veterinary care that include . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 2022
The disability discrimination statutes envision a “cooperative” and “flexible” process that “involves both the employer and the qualified individual with a disability.” Rennie v. United Parcel Serv., 139 F. … an employer engages in an interactive process with the employee, in good faith, for the purpose of discussing alternative reasonable accommodations, but the employee fails to 17 Townsend contends that Eaton did not clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 2022
The disability discrimination statutes envision a “cooperative” and “flexible” process that “involves both the employer and the qualified individual with a disability.” Rennie v. United Parcel Serv., 139 F. … an employer engages in an interactive process with the employee, in good faith, for the purpose of discussing alternative reasonable accommodations, but the employee fails to 17 Townsend contends that Eaton did not clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownHarrington v. Lesley University
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 12, 2021
Harrington bears the burden of establishing that the continuing violation doctrine applies. See Shervin v. … To establish the availability of the continuing violation doctrine, a plaintiff must allege three prerequisites.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAmgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.
126 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 19, 2001
However, this finding is insufficient to establish infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. … In order to serve this policy purpose, “the description must clearly allow persons of ordinary skill in the art to recognize that [the inventor] invented what is claimed.”
Cited 22 timesPublishedSiOnyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 30, 2018
HC, as the petitioner, and HPK, as an identified real party-in-interest in the IPR, clearly fall within the statutory definition. … But it is at least doubtful, in light of Halo, whether evidence establishing that an infringer should have known of the existence of certain patents (but did not know their exact contents) can suffice to establish that
Cited 0 timesUnknownAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 8, 2023
To meet this burden, ICE must establish that it “made a good faith effort to conduct a search for the requested records, using methods which can be reasonably expected to produce the information requested.” … To qualify as a good faith search, ICE must show that its methods “were reasonably expected to produce the information requested.” Kidd, 362 F. Supp. 2d at 294.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 2026
Standard for Entitlement to Disability Benefits To qualify for benefits, claimants must demonstrate that they are “disabled” within the meaning of the Social Security Act. … Clearly, ALJs cannot be expected to perform a comparison of each and every one of every claimant’s severe impairments to each and every listing. However, 20 C.F.R.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSmartling, Inc. v. Skawa Innovation Ltd.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 31, 2019
The Trade Dress At Issue As an initial matter, “the burden to clearly identify the trade dress at issue is on the plaintiff.” … “‘Although whether a particular set of acts, in their factual setting, is unfair or deceptive is a question of fact . . . the boundaries of what may qualify for consideration as a [Chapter] 93A violation is a question of
Cited 0 timesUnknownRyan v. The Newark Group, INC.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 18, 2024
In general, “court filings are recognized not for the truth of the matters asserted within them, but instead only to establish the fact that related litigation has been initiated or to establish that the fact that documents … This lacking factual foundation could not establish Harvard’s liability to the Plaintiffs on any claim.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · May 12, 2023
It was at this point, Plaintiffs contend, that USCIS abandoned the existing standards for qualifying for humanitarian parole and adopted new ones. [Id. ¶ 54]. C. … “Such actions clearly and directly involve a foreign affairs function, and so fall within the exception without a case-by-case iteration of specific undesirable consequences.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · May 12, 2020
In sum, the virus is clearly present in BCHOC, though its current prevalence is unknown. … Nonetheless, there remain critical safety gaps that establish a likelihood of irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary equitable relief.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLan Global, Inc. v. Alchemy Telco Solutions US, LLC
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2024
Within the framework of the MPA as a whole, “‘Working’ condition” is clearly understood to mean “functional.” Under the MPA, Alchemy was obligated to provide Lan Global with functional, or “working,” devices. … Under that Rule, a qualified expert may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert's . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 13, 2020
Furey had only mild and moderate limitations and, therefore, could not qualify under the “paragraph B” criteria. [Id.]. As to whether Ms. … Furey could qualify based on the “paragraph C” criteria, which requires that a mental disorder be “serious and persistent,” ALJ Klibaner found that the evidence failed to establish the presence of the “paragraph C” criteria
Cited 0 timesUnknownNoonan v. Wonderland Greyhound Park Realty LLC
723 F. Supp. 2d 298 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 8, 2010
Noonan fails to establish that notice was made in conformity with section 11.1 regarding any such nonpayment as a matter of law. … Again, Noonan fails to establish such notice as a matter of law.
Cited 23 timesPublishedUnited States v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 8, 2021
On July 6, 2021, the court denied DePuy’s motion, stating its finding “that DePuy has failed to establish that any information in the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) that previously may have been restricted was not in the … “Without a doubt, the disregard of court orders qualifies as extreme behavior . . . .” Malot, 478 F.3d at 44.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 12, 2023
endangered species in which the association’s member established a demonstrable interest). … However, Plaintiffs have not established standing as to these challenges.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPurdue Pharma, L.P. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. <b><font color="red"> LEAD CASE</font></b>
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 2018
At a minimum, Purdue’s response to the examiner did not clearly disclaim all other forms of oxycodone, including oxycodone myristate. … In other words, if a drug contains a pharmaceutical excipient (component D) with an excipient function (function Z) that also happens to irritate when the product is abused, that excipient would not qualify
Cited 0 timesUnknown820 F. Supp. 2d 151 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 20, 2011
Therefore, to qualify as an impartial juror an individual must not have views or personal experiences that will prevent or substantially impair his or her ability to decide a matter based solely on the evidence. … Moreover, thinking of J and P damaged, if not destroyed, C’s general ability to think clearly and respond rationally, rather than with excessive emotion, about other matter’s.
Cited 17 timesPublishedContent Square SAS v. Decibel Insight Limited
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 23, 2021
Statutory Framework An invention is generally patentable if it qualifies as a “new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter.” 35 U.S.C. § 101. … Indeed, language in the relevant specification “clearly indicate[d] that the claims are directed to an improvement in the functioning of computers, particularly those with small screens.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna