Case law

Needleman v. Bohlen

457 F. Supp. 942 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 30, 1978

In Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), the United States Supreme Court stated: , Property interests, of course, are not created by the Constitution. … Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

United States v. Cafiero

221 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 26, 2002

[T]he captain requested that physicians on board the flight sedate the defendant .... … In the case of United States v.

Riehm v. Hambleton

53 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 21, 1943

. § 63 , to review the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the Patent Office which awarded priority of invention between these same parties to the defendant Frederick Hambleton. … See Larson v. Crowther, 55 App.D.C. 58 , 1 F.2d 761 , DeForest v. Owens, 18 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1424, 49 F.2d 826 , and Owens v. Sponable, 21 C.C.P.A., Patents, 992, 69 F.2d 650, 652 .

Parenti v. Ponte

565 F. Supp. 987 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 17, 1983

See, e.g., Hewitt v. Helms,-U.S.-,- --, 103 S.Ct. 864, 869-71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983), Olim v. Wakinekona,-U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1741 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983). … Compare King v. Higgins, 702 F.2d 18 , 1 Cir.1983 (disciplinary hearing must be accompanied by at least minimal procedural safeguards) with Daigle v.

United States v. Soto-Mateo

948 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 3, 2013

United States v. Stokes, 124 F.3d 39, 44 (1st Cir.1997). … Defendant did not seek to appeal the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Instead, he explicitly waived his right to appeal in the stipulated agreement.

Filippou v. Italia Societa per Azioni Di Navizione

254 F. Supp. 162 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 18, 1966

Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354, 381-384 , 79 S.Ct. 468 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 368 ; Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 , 73 S.Ct. 921 , 97 L.Ed. 1254 ; Volkenburg P.P.A. v. Nedereland-Amerik. Stoomv. … Maats, 1 Cir., 336 F.2d 480 ; Zouras v.

Kettenbach v. Demoulas

822 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 28, 1993

Park v. … Norman v. Brown, Todd & Heybum, 693 F.Supp. 1259, 1261 (D.Mass. 1988) (denying motion to transfer under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a)).

Estrada v. Progressive Direct Insurance

53 F. Supp. 3d 484 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 20, 2014

Co. v. … Ltd. v. Brown & Brown, Inc., 533 F.3d 20, 23 (1st Cir.2008) (quoting Martinonis v. Utica Nat'l Ins. Grp., 65 Mass.App.Ct. 418, 421 , 840 N.E.2d 994 (2006)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Ahoyian v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority

211 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 4, 1962

Dreyer v. Illinois, 1902, 187 U.S. 71 , 23 S.Ct. 28 , 47 L.Ed. 79 ; Opinion of the Justices, supra. Nor are plaintiffs without certain rights of review. Luke v. … Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 1938, 303 U.S. 41 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 . Plaintiffs’ first move should have been to seek the relief offered by section 40 itself. McCarthy v.

Brooks v. Walker

82 F.R.D. 95 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 27, 1979

In Link v. … Link v. Wabash Railroad, supra, 634 n.10, 82 S.Ct. 1386 ; Schwarz v. United States, 384 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1967); Brown v. Bliss, 72 F.R.D. 198 (D.Md.1976). Order accordingly.

Hairston v. Home Loan & Investment Bank

814 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 18, 1993

Co., 350 F.2d 924, 928-29 (8th Cir.1965); Donohue v. Board of Elections, 435 F.Supp. 957, 964 (E.D.N.Y.1976); McCarty v. Amoco Pipeline Co., 595 F.2d 389, 395 (7th Cir.1979). … In Williams v.

United States v. Little

59 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 23, 1999

Co. v. Ropes & Gray, 65 F.3d 973, 981 (1st Cir.1995). More importantly, the court doubts whether the state board’s administrative decision may be considered a final judgment on the merits. See Stowe v. … The court understands that Defendant may seek judicial review of the state board’s finding.

The Sarah Jane

21 F. Cas. 456 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 15, 1868

The libellants allege that they have served as mariners on board the sloop Sarah Jane, in voyages between Boston and Quincy. … See Maguire v. Card, 21 How. [62 v. S.] 248; Bondies v. Sherwood, 22 How. [63 U. S.] 214; Allen v. Newberry, 21 How. [62 U. S.] 244; Nelson v. Leland, ubi supra; New Jersey Steam. Nav. Co. v. Merchants’ Bank, ubi supra.

Lane v. Potter

699 F. Supp. 2d 358 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 2010

On or about December 7, 2007, he appealed his reassignment to the Merit System Protection Board (“MSPB”). … See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

New England Apple Council, Inc. v. Donovan

640 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 9, 1985

Church of Scientology v. Harris, 653 F.2d 584, 587 (D.C.Cir.1981); Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives, 656 F.2d 856, 870 (D.C.Cir.1981). … News 6267, 6288; Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 742 (D.C.Cir.1979). First, the Court may consider what, if any, benefit accrued to the public through plaintiff’s request for and receipt of information.

Kingsley v. Lania

221 F. Supp. 2d 93 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 25, 2002

It is, at a minimum, questionable whether the instant dispute, which took place well before boarding and far from the plane, was the type of dispute which would be preempted. … Other circuits have “adopted a much broader definition,” including coverage of boarding procedures. Id. and cases cited.

Blake v. Fair

563 F. Supp. 836 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 2, 1983

Concord Advisory Board v. Hall, 447 F.Supp. 398, 404 (D.Mass.1978); .. . … Concord Advisory Board v. Hall, 447 F.Supp. at 404 . “An isolation cell must be sanitary, adequately lighted and ventilated.” Laaman v. Helgemoe, 437 F.Supp. 269, 310 (D.N. H.1977).

Nicastro v. the Gas Screw Peggy B.

173 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 7, 1959

Two of his crew members boarded the Peggy B. and placed Berdan in a sling in which he was lifted aboard the St. Victoria. Nieastro notified the Coast Guard. … Respondent cites as authority for this proposition only a dictum in The Judith Lee Rose, Inc. v. The Clipper, D. C., 169 F.Supp. 885, 887 .

In Re the Snow Maiden

159 F. Supp. 30 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 24, 1958

Saturday, November 19, 1955, the schooner The Snow Maiden, under the command of its owner White, went aground on Brown's Bank, during a storm. At 4 a. m. … Folsom v. Barrett, 180 Mass. 439, 441-442 , 62 N.E. 723, 724 .

Commonwealth v. Sullivan

803 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 22, 1992

Commonwealth of Mass. v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 816 F.2d 796, 799-800 (1st Cir.1987), rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom. Bowen v. … Set aside the Board’s Decision No. 1034; and 3. Grant such declaratory and other relief as the Court deems just. Complaint at 7.