Case law

In re Swift

108 F. 212 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 4, 1901

See Talty v. Trust Co., 93 U. S. 321 , 23 L. Ed. 886 ; Cumnock v. Savings Inst., 142 Mass. 342 , 7 N. E. 342 . … See Moreland v. Brown, 30 C. C. A., 23 , 86 Fed. 257 ; Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. School Dist. Mo. 8, 36 C. C. A. 432 , 94 Fed. 705; Spokane Co. v. First Mat. Bank, 16 C. C. A. 81 , 68 Fed. 979 .

Princiotta v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

532 F. Supp. 1009 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 1, 1982

See Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 430 , 96 S.Ct. 2697, 2702 , 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976). … See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227, 230 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Hayes v. New England Millwork Distributors, Inc., 602 F.2d 15, 19-20 (1st Cir. 1979).

Sweeney v. Keystone Provident Life Insurance

578 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 19, 1983

Compare Brown v. Providence Gas Co., 445 F.Supp. 459 (D.R.I.1976) (amendment related back); to Marine Midland Bank v. … In Raymer v. Bay State Nat’l Bank, 384 Mass. 310 , 424 N.E.2d 515 (1981) and Dodd v.

Tauber v. Town of Longmeadow

695 F. Supp. 1358 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 7, 1988

Sub-paragraph (d) permits the installation of traffic signs by the Board of Selectmen. … Verrilli v. City of Concord, 548 F.2d 262, 265-66 (9th Cir. 1977).

Fischer v. U. S. Department of Transportation

430 F. Supp. 1349 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 29, 1977

She prevailed before the Civil Service Commission Appeals Review Board, winning a retroactive promotion and back pay. She now seeks to recover interest on the back pay and an award of attorney’s fees. … Alyeska Pipeline Co., supra; Turner v.

In Re Eaton Vance Corporation Securities Litigation

206 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 11, 2002

Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc., 194 F.3d 185, 191 (1st Cir.1999). … See Gross v. Summa Four, Inc., 93 F.3d 987, 991 (1st Cir.1996); Serabian v. Amoskeag Bank Shares, Inc., 24 F.3d 357, 367 (1st Cir.1994); In re Boston Tech. Inc. Sec.

Cobb v. SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS

334 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 31, 2004

On February 26, 2004 plaintiff Matthew Cobb, Esq., pro se, filed this federal case seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction against state judicial proceedings to review a Board of Bar Overseer’s (“BBO”) recommendation … See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962) (a motion to amend may be denied because of undue delay and/or because the amendment would be futile); Kennedy v.

United States v. Vallee

380 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 5, 2005

United States v. … States v.

Raytheon Co. v. McLellan

304 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 8, 1969

See, e. g., O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 1950, 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 ; O’Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Assoc. Inc., *435 1964, 380 U.S. 359 , 85 S.Ct. 1012 , 13 L.Ed.2d 895 . … See Proctor v. Hoage, 1935, 65 U.S.App.D.C. 153 , 81 F.2d 555 ; Martin v.

Aronson v. Servus Rubber Division of Chromalloy American Corp. Employees' Profit-Sharing Plan

566 F. Supp. 1545 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 19, 1983

See also Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank, 485 F.Supp. 629, 635 (W.D. Wis.1979). 3. … Indeed, as was observed in Freund v.

Gordon v. Ashcroft

283 F. Supp. 2d 435 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2003

This is a challenge to a final order of removal issued against the petitioner by the Board of Immigration Appeals. … See Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.1986); Scott v. Schweiker, 702 F.2d 13, 14 (1st Cir.1983); United States v.

Needleman v. Bohlen

457 F. Supp. 942 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 30, 1978

In Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), the United States Supreme Court stated: , Property interests, of course, are not created by the Constitution. … Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

United States v. Cafiero

221 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 26, 2002

[T]he captain requested that physicians on board the flight sedate the defendant .... … In the case of United States v.

Parenti v. Ponte

565 F. Supp. 987 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 17, 1983

See, e.g., Hewitt v. Helms,-U.S.-,- --, 103 S.Ct. 864, 869-71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983), Olim v. Wakinekona,-U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1741 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983). … Compare King v. Higgins, 702 F.2d 18 , 1 Cir.1983 (disciplinary hearing must be accompanied by at least minimal procedural safeguards) with Daigle v.

United States v. Soto-Mateo

948 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 3, 2013

United States v. Stokes, 124 F.3d 39, 44 (1st Cir.1997). … Defendant did not seek to appeal the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Instead, he explicitly waived his right to appeal in the stipulated agreement.

Filippou v. Italia Societa per Azioni Di Navizione

254 F. Supp. 162 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 18, 1966

Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354, 381-384 , 79 S.Ct. 468 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 368 ; Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 , 73 S.Ct. 921 , 97 L.Ed. 1254 ; Volkenburg P.P.A. v. Nedereland-Amerik. Stoomv. … Maats, 1 Cir., 336 F.2d 480 ; Zouras v.

Kettenbach v. Demoulas

822 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 28, 1993

Park v. … Norman v. Brown, Todd & Heybum, 693 F.Supp. 1259, 1261 (D.Mass. 1988) (denying motion to transfer under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a)).

Ahoyian v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority

211 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 4, 1962

Dreyer v. Illinois, 1902, 187 U.S. 71 , 23 S.Ct. 28 , 47 L.Ed. 79 ; Opinion of the Justices, supra. Nor are plaintiffs without certain rights of review. Luke v. … Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 1938, 303 U.S. 41 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 . Plaintiffs’ first move should have been to seek the relief offered by section 40 itself. McCarthy v.

Estrada v. Progressive Direct Insurance

53 F. Supp. 3d 484 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 20, 2014

Co. v. … Ltd. v. Brown & Brown, Inc., 533 F.3d 20, 23 (1st Cir.2008) (quoting Martinonis v. Utica Nat'l Ins. Grp., 65 Mass.App.Ct. 418, 421 , 840 N.E.2d 994 (2006)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Doe v. Medeiros

266 F. Supp. 3d 479 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 21, 2017

Co. v. … There, the court affirmed a judgment entered by the state’s Unemployment Compensation Review Board (the "Board”) where the company for whom the secret shopper worked never showed up for the unemployment hearing. Corp.