Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,281 results
0.51s
45 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 4, 1942
Compare: Hannaford v. Charles River Trust Co., 241 Mass. 196 , 134 N.E. 795 ; Fowler v. Savage, 3 Conn. 90, 100, 101 . … Clews v. Jamieson, 182 U.S. 461 , 21 S.Ct. 845 , 45 L.Ed. 1183, 1192 ; Brown v. Fletcher, 235 U.S. 589 , 35 S.Ct. 154 , 59 L.Ed. 374, 378 ; and compare Security Bank of New York v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBruno v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.
229 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 12, 1964
Local Union No. 25 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. … New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., 350 U.S. 155 , 76 S.Ct. 227 , 100 L.Ed. 166 ; Great Northern Railway Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 272 F.2d 741 .
Cited 6 timesPublished150 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 31, 2001
When the COLOSO II was eventually boarded, the captain and crew were arrested. See id. at 549 . … See Norton v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedInterface Group-Massachusetts, LLC v. Rosen
256 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 7, 2003
Callahan v. Harvest Board Int’l, Inc., 138 F.Supp.2d 147, 157 (D.Mass.2001). … Workers of Am. v. 163 Pleasant St. Corp., 960 F.2d 1080, 1089 (1st Cir.1992)); see also Callahan v. Harvest Board Int’l, Inc., 138 F.Supp.2d 147, 164 (D.Mass.2001).
Cited 12 timesPublishedFaulkner Hospital Corp. v. Schweiker
537 F. Supp. 1058 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 13, 1982
Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas v. … Provider Reimbursement Review Board Hearing Decision # 79-D96, R. p. 21. (emphasis added). 9 .
Cited 6 timesPublished222 F. 1012 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 8, 1914
In some cases, such organizations have been held to be partnerships (Williams v. Johnson, 208 Mass. 544, 552 , 95 N. E. 90 ), and in others to be strictly trusts (Williams v. Milton, 215 Mass. 1 , 102 N. E. 355 ). … A “board of directors” is provided for, who may be appointed by the trustee and are removable by him; their duties are merely to advise the trustee; they are negligible as to the questions here raised.
Cited 23 timesPublished616 F. Supp. 1495 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 5, 1985
Guthrie v. … Morgan v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCrompton & Knowles Loom Works v. Stafford Co.
205 F. 925 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 25, 1913
This mechanism seems to be so clearly described as a matter devised by the inventor that cases of the type of Steward v. American Lava Co., 215 U. S. 161, 168 , 30 Sup. Ct. 46, 54 L. Ed. 139 , and United Wireless Co. v. … United States v. Fisk, 3 Wall. 445, 447 , 18 L. Ed. 243 ; 2 Am. & Eng. Enc. of L. (2d Ed.) 333 et seq.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMullenix v. Forsyth Dental Infirmary for Children
965 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 13, 1996
Dibart, a board certified periodontist, obtained a dental degree in France in 1982 and in the United States in 1989. He is a board certified periodontist. Forsyth hired Dr. Dibart as a staff associate. According to Dr. … Board of Trustees, 55 F.3d at 951 , and the male employee’s proven ability to generate higher revenue for the employer’s business, see Byrd v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedState Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
874 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 11, 1995
Co. v. … United States v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedYandell v. White City Amusement Park, Inc.
232 F. Supp. 582 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 1964
The Court refused to allow the trustee to further answer, Hovey v. Crane, 29 Mass. (12 Pick.) 166 (1831); Carrique v. Sidebottom, 44 Mass. (3 Metc.) 297 (1841); Collins v. … See Nineteenth Ward Bank v.
Cited 2 timesPublished29 F. Cas. 1309 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 15, 1859
S. v. Reid, 12 How. [53 U. … S. v. Barker [Case No. 14,516].
Cited 3 timesPublished638 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 1986
E.g., Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650, 652-53 , 85 S.Ct. 614, 616-17 , 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1965); Robbins v. George W. Prescott Publishing Co., 457 F.Supp. 915, 919 (D.Mass.1978); Azzi v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Rose v. Nashua Board of Education, 679 F.2d 279, 282 (1st Cir.1982).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 2, 2019
Knight v. Spencer, 447 F.3d 6, 15 (1st Cir. 2006) (quotations omitted); see also Epsom v. … Malone v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLeaver v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 19, 2024
Gillen-Brown. … Gillen-Brown have made a plausible allegation their religious beliefs were the reason for the adverse actions.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNorthern Voyager Ltd. Partnership v. Thames Shipyard & Repair Co.
214 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 17, 2002
The Coast Guardsmen then began boarding the fishing boat with additional pumps. With the crew’s guidance, they tried to dewater the vessel. … See United States v. S.A.
Cited 2 timesPublished18 F. Cas. 1269 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1866
Montgomery v. Wharton [Case Mo. 9,737], and on appeal, 1 Dall. [1 U. S.] 49. … shall bring it up at that .time. 2 With regard to the allegation that the libel-lant has forfeited all his wages by carrying some casks of Madeira wine, when the shipping articles prohibit the bringing distilled spirits on board
Cited 3 timesPublishedFederal Election Com'n v. MASS. CITIZENS
589 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 29, 1984
Buckley v. … Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished236 F. Supp. 2d 161 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 13, 2003
In Santa Fe v. … Peil v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. v. Converse, Inc.
86 F. Supp. 3d 35 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 18, 2015
Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 , 57 S.Ct. 163 , 81 L.Ed. 153 (1936). … It did not submit an opposition to the registration of the Converse Midsole Trademark when it was first published for opposition in January, 2013, nor did it initiate a proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna