Case law

Almonte v. Reno

27 F. Supp. 2d 106 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 19, 1998

In Wallace v. … In Barreiro v.

Sponge Products Corp. v. Fowler

147 F. Supp. 803 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 14, 1957

Gillman v. Stern, 2 Cir., 114 F.2d 28, 30 . … There is a board or plate hinged to the back of the brush just above the sponge-pad with a lever arrangement for forcing the board or plate down on the sponge-pad to squeeze. water from it.

United States v. Women's Sportswear Mfrs.' Ass'n

75 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 10, 1947

Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U.S. 375, 397, 398 , 25 S.Ct. 276 , 49 L.Ed. 518 ; Anderson v. United States, 171 U.S. 604 , 19 S.Ct. 50 , 43 L.Ed. 300 ; Hopkins v. … Therefore, cases like National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 , and National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Pimental

199 F.R.D. 28 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 20, 2001

represent a select minority of board members. … See United States v. Anderson, 778 F.2d 602, 605 (10th Cir.1985); United States v. Lartey, 716 F.2d 955, 964 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. Thomas, 593 F.2d 615, 623 (5th Cir.1979); United States v.

Gatti v. National Union Fire Insurance

939 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 15, 2013

Stewart v. U.S. … Browning v. Navarro, 887 F.2d 553, 558 (5th Cir.1989); see also Burgos v. Hopkins, 14 F.3d 787, 790 (2d Cir.1994).

Bally v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

707 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 1988

Miller v. Grgurich, 763 F.2d 372, 373 (9th Cir.1985); see also Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel, 257 U.S. 92, 97 , 42 S.Ct. 35, 37 , 66 L.Ed. 144 (1921). … See Butler v. Polk, 592 F.2d 1293, 1296 (5th Cir.1979) (stating that “it is axiomatic that ambiguities are generally construed against removal”); Jones v.

Shulse v. Western New England University

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 4, 2020

Doe v. Brown Univ., 166 F. Supp. 3d 177, 181 n.3 (D.R.I. 2016) (quoting Arruda v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 310 F.3d 13, 18 (1st Cir. 2002)).   … Claims Against Caprio and the Board Defendants have also requested dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against Caprio and the Board.

United States Department of the Treasury v. Gosselin

252 B.R. 854 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 31, 2000

(In re Fernandez), 123 F.3d 241, 244-245 (5th Cir.1997); Mitchell v. Franchise Tax Board, State of California (In re Mitchell), 209 F.3d 1111 , 1119 (9th Cir.2000). … See, e.g., Elias v. California Franchise Tax Board (In re Elias), 218 B.R. 80, 87 (9th Cir. BAP 1998); DeAngelis v. Lasky (In re DeAngelis), 239 B.R. 426, 430 (Bankr.D.Mass.1999) (Kenner, C.J.).

Rice v. President & Fellows

2 Mass. Supp. 154 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 3, 1981

That designation also describes the small governing board of the University which acts as the board of directors of the corporation. The members of the faculty are not “Fellows” ás alleged by the plaintiff. … Dombrowski v. Dowling, supra. Cf., e.g., Harvey v. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc., 589 F.2d 451, 455, n. 7 (9th Cir. 1979); Giant Paper and Film Corporation v. Albemarle Paper Co., 430 F.Supp. 981, 985 (S.D.

Egger v. Local 276, Plumbers & Pipefitters Union

644 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 23, 1986

(“the Board”). … Id. at 71-73 , 95 S.Ct. at 989-90 ; Graphic Arts Int’l Union, Local 280 v. N.L.R.B., 596 F.2d 904, 914 (9th Cir.1979). Egger was not required to proceed by filing a complaint with the Board rather than the EEOC.

In Re Raytheon Securities Litigation

157 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 29, 2001

P’shp. v. … P’ship, LP v.

The Revere

20 F. Cas. 574 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 15, 1862

She there took on board a cargo of turpentine, and sailed on her return voyage; and, soon after leaving Beaufort, was boarded by the United States gunboat Daylight, the captain of which said to the master of the Revere, as … Co. v. Woods, 6 Cranch [10 U. S.] 29, and other authorities cited by the counsel for the claimants.

United States v. Peguero-Martinez

771 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 30, 2010

See Bifulco v. … See, e.g., United States v.

D'Agostino v. Federal Insurance

969 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 10, 2013

Subsequently, on February 4, 2013, the plaintiff served interrogatories on Federal and noticed the deposition of Brown and Dupont Forensic Consultants, LLC (“Brown and Dupont”), a firm that had been retained by Federal to … See McCarthy v.

Beaulieu v. Hartigan

430 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 14, 1977

Jimenez v. … Brown, Assistant U. S.

Parker v. New England Oil Corp.

4 F.2d 392 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 18, 1924

Old Dominion Copper Co. v. Bigelow, 188 Mass. 315, 320 , 74 N. E. 653 , 108 Am. St. Rep. 479 ; s. c., 203 Mass. 159 , 89 N. E. 193 , 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 314; Erlanger v. New Sombrero Co., 3 App. Cas. 1218; Hayward v. … Hill v. Hall, 191 Mass. 253, 263, 264 , 77 N. E. 831 , and cases cited. This general principle is well stated in Arnold v. Brown, 24 Pick. 89 , 96, 97, 35 Am.

B. C. Morton International Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

199 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 29, 1961

Howard v. Lyons, 360 U.S. 593, 597 , 79 S.Ct. 1331 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1454 ; Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564 , 79 S.Ct. 1335 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 1434 ; Greenberg v. Panama Transport Co., D.Mass., 185 F.Supp. 320 . … See dissenting opinions of Justices Douglas and Brennan in Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 446-448 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 1469 . Motion granted. Amended complaint dismissed with costs.

Sternklar v. Heritage Auction Galleries, Inc. (In Re Rarities Group, Inc.)

434 B.R. 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2010

See, e.g., Brown v. Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. … Bank, N.A. v.

Fiorino v. Turner

476 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 19, 1979

E. g., Brown v. Duggan, 329 F.Supp. 207 (W.D.Pa.1971) ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242); Bryant v. Donnell, 239 F.Supp. 681 (W.D.Tenn.1965) ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 371). … E. g., Briley v.

Howard v. 9,889 Bags of Malt

255 F. 917 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 15, 1919

And it would he a serious sacrifice of his interests if the ship was compelled, in order to preserve the lien, to remain day after day with, her cargo on board, waiting until the consignee found it convenient to pay the freight … , or until the lien could be enforced in a court of admiralty.” ' See, also, Costello v.