Case law

Smith v. WGBH-TV, WGBH Educational Foundation

2 Mass. Supp. 25 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 21, 1980

Richman v. General Motors Corporation, 437 F.2d 196, 199 (1st Cir. 1971). Accord, Medeiros v. United States, 621 F.2d 468, 470 (1st Cir. 1980); Zavala Santiago v. Gonzalez, 553 F.2d 710, 712 (1st Cir. 197-7); Pease v. … See, generally, Citizens Utilities Co. v.

Bumps v. Trasavage

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 6, 2020

Gray v. … Cf., Pina v.

Williams v. The Juno

29 F. Cas. 1368 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1810

But the distinction suggested by Judge Peters, in the case of Howland v. … In this decision, I agree with the repeated determinations of Judge Peters, and with the supreme court of Massachusetts in the case of Brooks v. Dorr, 2 Mass. 39 . And the principles of the case of Beale v.

Kelley v. Thompson

7 F. Cas. 1031 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 15, 1867

Chamberlain v. Ward. 21 How. [62 U. S.) 548. The evidence in this case, on both sides, shows that *the lights of the D. … All the witnesses on board that vessel deny it, and no one on the libellants’ schooner, excepting the mate, is willing to say that he saw any change of that sort, though they argue that one must have been made.

Graham v. Sabol

734 F. Supp. 2d 194 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 12, 2010

See Woodson v. … One percipient witness, inmate Anthony Moats, attests that the officials used an ironing board due to a lack of stretchers in the unit. (Ex. A).

The Abbie C. Stubbs

28 F. 719 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 9, 1886

It *720 has been recently decided by the supreme court in the case of Place v. Norwich & N. Y. Transp. Co., 6 Sup. Ct. … They stand on the same footing as repairs made after the collision, which the court decided in Place v. Norwich & N. Y. Transp.

Brisbois v. Hague

85 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 27, 1949

Olin Industries, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board, D.C., 72 F. … Massachusetts Protective Ass’n, Inc., v. Kittles, 5 Cir., 1924, 2 F.2d 211 ; Love v. United States, 8 Cir., 1939, 108 F. 2d 43 ; Di Benedetto v.

Deitrick v. Fenderson

27 F. Supp. 469 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 1, 1939

See Gillingham v. Brown, 178 Mass. 417 , 60 N.E. 122 , 55 L.R.A. 320 ; Markiewicz v. Toton, 292 Mass. 434 , 198 N.E. 659 ; Day v. Mayo, 154 Mass. 472 , 28 N.E. 898 . To return to the findings of fact. … See Gillingham v. Brown, supra, and Wendell v. Clark, 240 Mass. 562 , 134 N.E. 608 . If the whole question were deemed a matter of law and to present no question of fact, the same result is reached.

Wetherell Bros. v. White

46 F.2d 83 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 3, 1930

Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 19 B. T. A. 315; James & Holmstrom Piano Company v. Commissioner, 19 B. T. A. 322; and Joy Floral Company v. Commissioner, 58 App. D. C. 277, 29 F.(2d) 865 . … In the recent case, Panther Rubber Company v. Commissioner (C. C.

The City of Boston

182 F. 174 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 10, 1909

There is before me, as there no doubt was before the jury, conflicting evidence as to the nature and extent of the effects upon her health due to her experiences while on board after the collision. … Kelley v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R., 168 Mass. 308 , 46 N. E. 1063 , 38 L. R. A. 631, 60 Am. St. Rep. 397 .

Powell v. City of Pittsfield

221 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 21, 2002

Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … See Quick v.

Kotler v. American Tobacco Co.

731 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 12, 1990

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 679 F.Supp. 485, 487-8 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 856 F.2d 184 (3d Cir.1988). It is undisputed that Mr. Kotler died of lung cancer in 1986. … Miller v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., supra, at pp. 488-9. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment on this claim.

Govoni v. Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers International Union of America, Local No. 5

573 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 19, 1983

See, e.g., Burroughs v. Board of Trustees, 9 Cir.1976, 542 F.2d 1128 , cert, den., 429 U.S. 1096 , 97 S.Ct. 1113 , 51 L.Ed.2d 543 . … He cites Snyder v.

In Re Pharmaceutical Industry Ave. Wholesale Price

685 F. Supp. 2d 186 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 9, 2010

Brown, Brown, Buchanan & Sessoms, PA, Robert W. Wilkinson, Dogan & Wilkinson, PLLC, Pascagoula, MS, Ronald G. … Luther v. Consol. Indus., Inc., 720 F.Supp. 919, 922 (N.D.Ala. 1989); United States v. Rapoport, 514 F.Supp. 519, 523 (S.D.N.Y.1981); Fleming v.

Rea v. Cutler

20 F. Cas. 344 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 15, 1846

Co. v. Ashby. … stated, otherwise, that the *345 peril sought to be avoided, was that of drifting, stern foremost, on a rocky point, projecting far into the sea, and far from high-water mark, and where, if the vessel had struck, all on board

Terry Steam Turbine Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.

204 F. 103 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1913

See Stuart v. Hayden, 72 Fed. 402, 410 , 18 C. C. A. 618 ; Id., 169 U. S. 1 , 18 Sup. Ct. 274, 42 L. Ed. 639 . … See Stonemetz, etc., Co. v. Brown, etc., Co. (C. C.) 46 Fed. 851, 852 . The petition for leave to file the proposed supplemental answer is therefore denied.

Sullivan v. Tagliabue

828 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 29, 1993

Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 534-35 , 103 S.Ct. 897, 906-07 , 74 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983); Blue Shield of Virginia v. … Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat., Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690, 697 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (quoting Brown Shoe v.

The Clover

5 F. Cas. 1095 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 15, 1869

The theory of the defence is that the only mistake was in not keeping on at full speed; but this mistake would have been avoided hy having a competent lookout on board the Sarnia to report whether she was dangerously near … See O’Neal v. Sears [Case No. 10,530], and The Marcia Tribou [supra].

EMC Corp. v. Chevedden

4 F. Supp. 3d 330 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 16, 2014

In its letter to EMC, the SEC stated: The proposal requests that the board adopt a policy, and amend other governing documents as necessary to reflect that policy, to require the chair of the board of directors to be an independent … member of the board.

Redstone v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

583 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 5, 1984

In addition, the plaintiffs seek relief for both wrongs as violations of Rule G-19 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”). … The motion to dismiss Count VI alleging violations of the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board is ALLOWED.