Case law

Langone v. Russo Bros.

964 F. Supp. 24 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 3, 1996

In March 1986 the Board of Trustees of the New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund amended section two of article V of the trust agreement to add the following language: In addition to all sums due to the … CJC Holdings, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, 1996 WL 142553 at * 11 (N.L.R.B. March 27, 1996) (citation omitted); accord National Labor Relations Board v.

Schmidt v. Boston Housing Authority

505 F. Supp. 988 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 20, 1981

Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo, 425 F.Supp. 987 (D.C.Pa. 1976), stay denied 429 F.Supp. 222 , modified 564 F.2d 126 (3d Cir. 1977), cert, denied 435 U.S. 908 , 98 S.Ct. 1457 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Gautreaux v. … Metropolitan Housing Development v. Village of Arlington Heights, 558 F.2d 1283 (7th Cir. 1977) (Arlington Heights II); Resident Advisory Board v.

In Re Segue Software, Inc. Securities Litigation

106 F. Supp. 2d 161 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 26, 2000

Brown made similarly favorable comments. … Brown was one of the lead underwriters for Segue’s 1996 initial public offering of its common stock. 12 .

Ultra-Temp Corp. v. Advanced Vacuum Systems, Inc.

194 F.R.D. 378 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 6, 2000

The only case cited by the plaintiff on this issue in its motion for reconsideration is Denver Roof and Homer Roof v. Brown, a Sixth Circuit case. … However, the citation is to a case entitled Roof v. Brown which is part of a list of Sixth Circuit "Decisions Without Published Opinions."

TB Holdings, LLC v. Town of Saugus, Scott Crabtree, and John Does 1-10

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 2, 2026

There are two ongoing proceedings 2 Planning Boards are the “subdivision control agency in all cities and towns, except Boston.” Del Duca v. … In Bristol Asphalt, Co., Inc. v.

Storlazzi v. Bakey

894 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 25, 1995

See Leahy v. Board of Trustees, 912 F.2d 917 (7th Cir.1990) (finding that union was not acting under color of state law and therefore § 1983 claim was barred); Hovan v. … Cleveland Board of Education v.

Foster v. Mydas Associates, Inc.

779 F. Supp. 614 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 12, 1991

Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 279 (3d Cir.1990); see also Foster v. Mydas, 943 F.2d at 144 . … See *620 Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d at 279, 280 . Thus, for the reasons outlined above, this Court has determined that the defendants should be awarded costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 .

In Re Celexa & Lexapro Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

751 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 10, 2010

Id.; Salenga v. … Padula v. Lilarn Props.

Evans v. Nantucket Community Sailing, Inc.

582 F. Supp. 2d 121 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 22, 2008

Menin v. … Hirsch is board certified in neurology and psychiatry whereas Dr.

Franchi Construction Co. v. Local No. 560 of the International Hod Carriers

248 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 30, 1965

United Brick & Clay Workers of America v. Deena Artware Inc., 198 F.2d 637 (6th Cir. 1952); Schatte v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Emp., 182 F.2d 158, 165 (9th Cir. 1950); Pepper & Potter, Inc. v. … The objection that the alleged conduct of which the plaintiffs complain constitutes an unfair labor practice and is, therefore, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board has been answered by

Graham v. Sabol

734 F. Supp. 2d 194 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 12, 2010

See Woodson v. … One percipient witness, inmate Anthony Moats, attests that the officials used an ironing board due to a lack of stretchers in the unit. (Ex. A).

Van Wagner Communications, LLC v. Massachusetts Department of Transportation

953 F. Supp. 2d 313 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 10, 2013

The OAA was controlled by a three-member board, appointed by the governor. In 1955 the OAA was renamed the Outdoor Advertising Board (“OAB”). In 1965 Congress enacted the Federal Highway Beautification Act (“FHBA”). … Corp. v. Pub. Serv.

Bush v. Quebecor Printing (USA) Corp.

130 F. Supp. 2d 301 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 21, 2001

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp., 138 F.3d 1374, 1393 (11th Cir.1998); Browning v. AT&T Paradyne, 120 F.3d 222 , 226-27 (11th Cir.1997). A. … See Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

Steele v. Bongiovi

784 F. Supp. 2d 94 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 17, 2011

Plevan, Scott Brown, Christopher G. Clark, Clifford M. Sloan and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates (“the Attorney Defendants”). … See id.; Solis-Alarcon v.

Bumps v. Trasavage

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 6, 2020

Gray v. … Cf., Pina v.

Parikh v. Franklin Medical Center

940 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 20, 1996

See, e.g., Eastman Kodak Co. v. … See Venzie Corp. v. U.S. Mineral Products Co., Inc., 521 F.2d 1309, 1317-18 (3rd Cir.1975); White v. Rockingham Radiologists, Ltd., 820 F.2d 98, 104 (4th Cir.1987); Keener v.

Tri-City Community Action Program, Inc. v. City of Malden

680 F. Supp. 2d 306 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 22, 2010

Tri-CAP then applied to the Malden Planning Board for a special permit to make the renovations. … See Sole v.

Williams v. The Juno

29 F. Cas. 1368 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1810

But the distinction suggested by Judge Peters, in the case of Howland v. … In this decision, I agree with the repeated determinations of Judge Peters, and with the supreme court of Massachusetts in the case of Brooks v. Dorr, 2 Mass. 39 . And the principles of the case of Beale v.

Kelley v. Thompson

7 F. Cas. 1031 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 15, 1867

Chamberlain v. Ward. 21 How. [62 U. S.) 548. The evidence in this case, on both sides, shows that *the lights of the D. … All the witnesses on board that vessel deny it, and no one on the libellants’ schooner, excepting the mate, is willing to say that he saw any change of that sort, though they argue that one must have been made.

Mongue v. The Wheatleigh Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 23, 2023

See Murray v. Grocery Delivery E-Servs. … (quoting Cohen v. Brown Univ., 16 F.4th 935, 945 (1st Cir. 2021)).