Case law

STATE POLICE FOR AUTOMATIC RETIREMENT v. Difava

138 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 28, 2001

See Alden v. … (quoting Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159 , 167 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. 3099 , 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985)). Most recently, in Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama v.

United States v. Weiner

701 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 13, 1988

The Coast Guard and and agents of the Federal Communications Commission boarded the SARAH and silenced the broadcasts. … They cite Boureslan v. ARAMCO, 857 F.2d 1014 (5th Cir.1988).

Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.

126 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 19, 2001

Egrie and Browne submitted declarations to the Board in which they described these experiments and pointed the Board to the relevant laboratory notebooks. Trial Ex. 213 at AM 17 079613(79) (Lin Ex. 112, Doc. Nos. … The Court also notes that the Board is the ultimate arbiter of matters of patentability within the Patent Office and the examiner is bound by the Board's decision.

Gill v. Office of Personnel Management

699 F. Supp. 2d 374 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 8, 2010

This argument stems from the fact that, unlike OPM, the Merit Systems Review Board deemed Mr. … Ass'n v.

Eeoc v. Intern. Bro. of Elec. Wkrs.

506 F. Supp. 480 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 20, 1981

Gamble v. … It is difficult to say exactly what the Minutes of the Trial Board prove. On this ground alone, summary judgment should be denied. Polaroid Corp. v. Schuster's Express, Inc., 1 Cir., 1973, 484 F.2d 349, 351 .

Amaral v. Commissioner of Social Security

797 F. Supp. 2d 154 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 13, 2010

The Decision Review Board (the “Board”) selected Amaral’s case for review, and soon thereafter Amaral requested an additional thirty days to submit additional documents. Id. at 8 . … V.

Barry Wright Corp. v. Pacific Scientific Corp.

555 F. Supp. 1264 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 28, 1983

Exclusionary conduct has been very broadly defined, most notably by Judge Wyzanski in United States v. … Computer Products v. Intern. Business Machines, 613 F.2d 727, 742 (9th Cir.1979).

Schmid v. National Bank of Greece, S.A.

622 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 14, 1985

Brown v. Kendall, 60 Mass. 292 (1850). The general rule is that, absent a special relationship, a person owes no duty to protect another from a third person’s wrongdoing. … Morrin v. Manning, 205 Mass. 205 , 91 N.E. 308 (1910); Marshall Vessels, Inc. v. Wright, 331 Mass. 487 , 120 N.E.2d 286 (1954).

Smith v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

684 F. Supp. 1113 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 11, 1988

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … The plaintiffs rely primarily on the decision in Cleveland Board of Education v.

Crawford v. Blue

271 F. Supp. 3d 316 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 21, 2017

The Merit Rating Board (the “Board”) and the Registry jointly administer CMVI matters. Id. ¶ 17. Four employees handle initial receipt of citations, hearing requests, and payments. Id. … Mard v. Town of Amherst, 350 F.3d 184, 188 (1st Cir. 2003) (citing Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538-41 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Board of Regents v.

Wood v. Goodman

381 F. Supp. 413 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 17, 1974

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L. Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L. Ed.2d 570 (1972); Lucia v. Duggan, 303 F. Supp. 112 (D.Mass., 1969). 6. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 570 n. 7 and 8, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L. Ed.2d 548 (1972); Id., at 585-587 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Vanderzanden v. Lowell School Dist.

The Vincennes

28 F. Cas. 1193 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 17, 1858

or crew need be on board until the vessel sailed, and he cited McLanahan v. … S.] 184. cited in Curtis, 7, 520; Weir v. Aberdeen, 2 Barn. & Aid. 320; Fland. Shipp. 64; Abb. Shipp. 421.

Town of Barnstable v. Berwick

17 F. Supp. 3d 113 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 2, 2014

Rptr. 1111 *117 (2010), followed by another onslaught against the Facilities Siting Board. See Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Inc. v. … See Papasan v.

Boston Chapter, NAACP, Inc. v. Beecher

371 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 11, 1974

Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167 , 1171 (2nd Cir., 1972); Pennsylvania v. O’Neill, 348 F.Supp. 1084, 1089-1090 (E.D.Pa., 1972). … [Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955).]” Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192, 200 , 93 S.Ct. 1463, 1469 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 (1972).

Albertini v. Summit Technical Services, Inc.

287 F. Supp. 2d 92 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 2003

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Gold, 30 F.3d 251, 253 (1st Cir.1994). … NASCO, Inc. v. Public Storage, Inc., 29 F.3d 28, 32 (1st Cir.1994).

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Aldred Inv. Trust

58 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 19, 1945

Adams and V. C. Bruce Wetmore, owners of the majority of the voting stock of Eastern Racing Association which operated the Suffolk Downs horse racing track in East Boston. … This authority was granted by the Board and Adams and Wetmore were hired in such capacities.

AW Chesterton Co., Inc. v. Chesterton

951 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 15, 1997

The Board sought to make this change because it would generate considerable tax savings. 1 To finalize the S election, the Board was required to obtain the unanimous consent of the shareholders. … Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc., 370 Mass. 842, 850-52 , 353 N.E.2d 657, 663 (1976). AH shareholders, including minority shareholders, are bound by the duty. See Smith v.

Boston Packaging Machinery Co. v. Woodman Co.

125 F. Supp. 567 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 10, 1954

Inc. v. … Rosenberg Bros. & Co., Inc. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 .

Cape Ann Investors LLC v. Lepone

296 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 15, 2003

Blue Chip Stamps v. … See Camelio v.

Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Springfield v. White

45 F.2d 911 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 19, 1930

The present ease is fully covered by Tyler v. U. S., 281 U. S. 497 , 50 S. Ct. 356 , 74 L. Ed. 991 , 69 A. L. … Board of Tax Appeals in Pennsylvania Company for Insurance v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, decided November 3, 1930, that tho Tyler Case applies regardless of the date when the tenancies were created.