Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
773 results
0.74s
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Dec 29, 2020
Weber7 technically only applies to “mixed” habeas petitions, and the petition here is not, at least yet, “mixed,” the standard is nevertheless applicable because Petitioner clearly seeks to transform his petition into a … Because the holding in Ramos has not yet been applied retroactively, Petitioner cannot at this time establish that he qualifies for the exception in Article 930.8(A)(2).
Cited 0 timesUnknown96 B.R. 620 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jan 24, 1989
After the time for appeal had run, the validity of the sale was established, even against nonparties to the sale proceeding. … (We emphasize that all this is Gekas’s version of the events; it is not established truth.)
Cited 10 timesPublished329 F. Supp. 2d 772 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Aug 5, 2004
In order to establish a prima facie case, the plaintiff then had to establish: (1) that she is covered by the FMLA; (2) that she suffered an adverse employment decision; and either (3a) that she was treated less favorably … Further, the Baton Rouge Marriott placed plaintiff in a managerial role, as she had been before as the Executive Housekeeper, even though it had clearly followed the law in replacing plaintiff as Executive Housekeeper because
Cited 16 timesPublishedGoudeau v. Dental Health Services, Inc.
901 F. Supp. 1139 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Oct 10, 1995
Buckley’s hours depended upon whether she was initiating some new program or solving problems as they arose with an established program. … The testimony showed that the individual dentists and those employees who were qualified shared in the defendant’s profits through its profit sharing plan.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAtchafalaya Basinkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs
310 F. Supp. 3d 707 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Feb 27, 2018
than those relied upon by the agency, the court would still be compelled to uphold the agency's finding so long as *716 their experts were qualified and their opinions reasonable. 38 B. … The Court cannot agree with Plaintiffs' characterization, and the administrative record establishes the contrary.
Reversed on other grounds by Atchafalaya Basinkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs, 894 F.3d 692 (2018)Cited 1 timesPublishedCarroll v. SGS North America, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Sep 28, 2020
to offer any expert opinion; Woolfson’s deposition testimony directly contradicts the conclusory statements and unfounded analysis found in the Affidavit, establishing a glaring lack of relevancy and reliability … forth Woolfson’s qualifications and experience, because that information is contained in Woolfson’s expert report, which was issued on May 24, 2019 and previously produced to Carroll.9 After arguing that Woolfson is clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownFountain v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · May 29, 2024
Each such statement shall begin with the designation “Admitted,” “Denied,” or “Qualified” and, in the case of an admission, shall end with such designation. … Oct. 18, 2021) (granting summary judgment dismissal because although the plaintiff fell due to a raised floormat at the storefront, the hazard was clearly visible and others noticed the hazard so the “condition was open
Cited 0 timesUnknown124 F. Supp. 3d 751 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Aug 24, 2015
Thus, the facts of Bailey are clearly much more analogous to the facts here. … Although Defendant's exact distance from his residence at the time of the stop was not *755 made clear at the hearing, the Court is satisfied as the fact finder that the distance certainly would not qualify as being within
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jul 20, 2020
A claim is factually frivolous if the alleged facts are “clearly baseless, a category encompassing allegations that are ‘fanciful,’ ‘fantastic,’ and ‘delusional.’”18 A claim has no arguable basis in law if … under Farmer’s “subjective” prong, plaintiffs must show that prison officials acted with a “sufficiently culpable state of mind.”48 The deliberate indifference standard sets a very high bar: the plaintiff must be able to establish
Cited 0 timesUnknownLewis v. Ascension Parish School Board
72 F. Supp. 3d 648 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Dec 18, 2014
Later that year, the School Board established a “Growth Impact Committee.” 4. … (“Bates”), who was qualified as an expert on the impact of a disproportionate number of at-risk students on an academic environment. 30 According to Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · Feb 2, 2023
Thus, the Fifth Circuit found no error in the district court’s conclusion that the guards did not act with deliberate indifference and were entitled to qualified immunity. Id. at 490. … Finally, any individual capacity claims fail because Gautreaux, Grimes, and Leader are entitled to qualified immunity. (Id.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · Mar 30, 2021
“A contract is formed by consent of the parties established through offer and acceptance.” SnoWizard, Inc. v. Robinson, 897 F. Supp. 2d 472, 478 (E.D. La. 2012) (citing La. Civ. Code art. 1927). … Unless specific statutes state otherwise, Louisiana law allows offer and acceptance to be made in any manner that is “clearly indicative of consent,” and there need not be conformity between the manner in
Cited 0 timesUnknownCentral Facilities Operating Co. v. Cinemark USA, Inc.
36 F. Supp. 3d 700 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Aug 6, 2014
Read in its entirety, the clear language of Article VII establishes the parties’ intent to establish obligations under two different scenarios. … The Court’s reading is further supported by the second scenario’s use of the qualifying phrase, “In the event.”
Cited 8 timesPublishedLouisiana Delta Service Corps v. Corporation for National and Community Service
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jun 27, 2025
established under the national service laws.” 42 U.S.C. §§ 12651 et seq.; 45 C.F.R. § 2500.2. … , or to establish a private right of action for their enforcement.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · Oct 19, 2022
Now the Government moves for summary judgment (Doc. 64, the “Motion”), arguing that undisputed evidence establishes that Cajun, a construction company, did not conduct any qualified research activities during the tax year … Defendants fail to offer competent evidence or argument establishing that Cajun performed “qualified research” The QRTC provides
Cited 0 timesUnknownMartin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
132 F. Supp. 3d 794 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Sep 23, 2015
It does' so because both contentions defy the Rules’ clear text, well-established case law, and the relevant documents. … Next, Winn-Dixie argues that Plaintiff was not qualified for her post. (Id. at 8.)
Cited 19 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · May 26, 2026
“The factors relevant to this inquiry include: (1) whether material issues of fact are at issue; (2) whether there has been substantial prejudice; (3) whether the grounds for default are clearly established; (4) whether … The grounds for default have been clearly established and, given the length of time Plaintiff has been on notice and the specific admonition of the Court, both orally and in writing,47 the default was not caused by good
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · Mar 26, 2025
“To make a prima facie case of disability discrimination under the ADA, [a plaintiff] must establish that ‘(1) she has a disability or was regarded as disabled, (2) she was qualified for the job, and (3) she was subject … anatomical loss affecting one or more body systems, such as neurological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory (including speech organs), cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, immune
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · Sep 20, 2019
a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the plaintiff must establish two elements: “(1) that the conduct in question deprived a person of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution or laws of the … excessive, and (3) the excessiveness of which was clearly unreasonable” (Cooper v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · Oct 10, 2024
A claim is factually frivolous if the alleged facts are “clearly baseless, a category encompassing allegations that are ‘fanciful,’ ‘fantastic,’ and ‘delusional.’” Id. at 32-33. … , if the court determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue; or the action is frivolous or malicious; fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna