Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterslactapp

8,141 results

1.64s

  • State v. Galindo

    968 So. 2d 1102 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 2007

    Ellie Wetsman, who was qualified as an expert in pediatric medicine including the treatment of pediatric sexual abuse, testified at trial that she examined the victim which examination included obtaining a history. … In order to prevail, a defendant must establish both that counsel's performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced the defendant. State v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • State v. Young

    271 So. 3d 422 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 15, 2019

    This certainly does not qualify Defendant as the exceptional case such as to warrant a finding that the sentencing provisions of La.R.S. 15:529.1 are unconstitutional as applied to him, nor does the recognition of the Defendant's … The record establishes that Defendant originally pled not guilty to the underlying offenses on July 25, 2014.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Succession of John L. Cazenave, Jr.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 2023

    Saux and Nurse Diaz, which it recognized was qualified on the assumption that Johnny was taking his prescribed medications. … Clearly, no quick litmus -paper test exists to apply to the evaluation of mental capacity in all cases.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ruby Gatlin Bickham, Wilbur Hayes Bickham, James Hayes Bickham, Individually and on Behalf of his Minor Children, James Hayes Bickham, II and Alyssa Dawn Bickham, and Misty Byrd Bickham v. Charles Regan Toon, Progressive Security Insurance Company, Teresa Marie Minarik, and ABC Insurance Company

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 2020

    have been foreseen”), “Toon’s actions clearly displayed a conscious indifference to the consequences that were likely to, and unfortunately did, occur. … of fault of all persons causing or contributing to the injury shall be determined, regardless of whether the other person is a party to the action or a nonparty, and regardless of the person’s insolvency, ability to pay, immunity

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Colby Stafford Harrington v. Town of Benton, Cori Desha Harrington, individually and as Trustee of the Patrick Hough Harrington Trust, and as Succession Representative of the Succession of Patrick Hough Harrington, Patrick Jordan Harrington, individually and as trustee of the Patrick Hough Harrington Trust, Mark Allen Harrington, Gaelan Scott Harrington, Jonah Blake Harrington, and Estate of Patrick Hough Harrington (consolidated with) Succession of Patrick Hough Harrington

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 2025

    App. 3 Cir. 1972), writ denied, 260 La. 1121, 258 So. 2d 376 (1972); or by other acts “clearly indicating” acceptance, Succession of Davisson, supra. … R.S. 47:2180 established the manner in which notice of delinquencies in immovable property taxes should be provided to comply with Art. VII, § 25.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Larry Bize, Sr. and Michelle R. Bize v. Malcolm Larvadain

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 2018

    as paupers. 10 By contrast, La.R.S. 13:4522 includes an express exception for those qualified as paupers. … As in this case, decisional law allowed the plaintiff an opportunity to qualify to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wayne Guillot, Et Ux. v. Reece Guillot, Et Ux.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2014

    The majority also finds the record establishes Reece was wrong to follow Wayne to his home and confront him in his own driveway. … Nor does the evidence establish that Wayne impliedly consented to the batteries perpetrated by Reece and Benjamin.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 2017

    While peremptory challenges are one means of assuring the selection of a qualified and unbiased jury, the U.S. … After a knowing and voluntary waiver of the Miranda rights, law enforcement officers may continue questioning a suspect unless or until he clearly requests an attorney. Davis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Alfred Palma, Inc. v. Crane Services, Inc.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2003

    The waiver was clearly articulated in the bill of sale and was made known to the buyer. … However, fraud need only be proven by a preponderance of the evidence and may be established by circumstantial evidence. LSA-C.C. art. 1957.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • William Coury Moss and Sarah James Moss v. Sugarland Exterminating and Chemical Company, Inc.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 8, 2024

    Lastly, the court reiterated that the purpose of abandonment is not to “dismiss actions on mere technicalities, but to dismiss actions which in fact clearly have been abandoned.” Id. at 786. … Therefore, we find that plaintiff failed to establish that his requests for production of documents directed to non-parties qualified as steps in the prosecution of his suit. Id. at 23.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • John L. Soileau v. Churchill Downs Louisiana Horseracing Company, L.L.C.,. Churchill Downs Louisiana Video Poker Company, L.L.C.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 2021

    Specifically, it qualifies as a licensed establishment because it 6 Louisiana Revised Statutes 27:438 relates to the “[d]istribution of device revenues” in quarter-horse and thoroughbred horse racing. … Specifically, it qualifies as a device owner because it “owns and operates . . . video draw poker devices in licensed establishments[,]” including at the CDLHR-owned Fair Grounds Race Course & Slots facility and at off-track

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Mayeux

    265 So. 3d 1096 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 6, 2019

    However, La.R.S. 15:438 does not establish a stricter standard of review on appeal than the rational juror's reasonable doubt standard. … As explained above, evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts may also be introduced to establish proof of motive.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State of Louisiana v. John Joseph

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 2005

    The facts, as stated at the time the guilty plea was entered, clearly support the plea of guilty to the charge of aggravated burglary. … Charging the defendant with both aggravated burglary and armed robbery, based upon the same set of facts, clearly violates the “same evidence” test as set forth in Crosby and Steele.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Alliance for Aff. Energy v. New Orleans

    578 So. 2d 949 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1991

    The report also clearly described the wisdom of diversification between nuclear and coal fired power. … Therefore, we decline to change the law or establish a new remedy for imprudently incurred costs.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Roy Neely v. Department of Fire

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 2021

    That review is multifaceted, and, in reviewing factual findings, appellate courts “should apply the clearly wrong or manifest error rule.” Walters v. … As the result of a first offense confirmed (MRO certified) positive test result as established by City Civil Service Rules for the use of alcoholic beverages or any of the illegal and/or unlawfully obtained

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Kennerson

    695 So. 2d 1367 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 7, 1997

    The bill clearly charges the defendant under La.R.S. 14:62 and states the essential elements of the offense. … Jones, 537 So.2d 848 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989) (fifteen years for a second offender convicted of simple burglary "clearly not excessive").

    Cited 578 timesPublished
  • Cami Lindgren, Et Ux. v. John T. Ning, M.D.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 2012

    Kubricht to establish that Dr. Ning’s use of the InterStim was below the standard of care because he failed to treat Mrs. … Ning clearly established that Dr. Ning’s credibility was highly questionable. Therefore, any error in this regard was harmless. As part of their argument, the Lindgrens also contend Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State of Louisiana v. Billy Ray Vice

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 2008

    However, La.R.S. 15:438 does not establish a stricter standard of review on appeal than the rational juror’s reasonable doubt standard. … extortion, a violation of La.R.S. 14:66, which provides: Extortion is the communication of threats to another with the intention thereby to obtain anything of value or any acquittance, advantage, or immunity

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Iberia General Hospital v. St. Mary Sugar Cooperative, Inc.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 2016

    Gaudet further verified that the EOMB sent by LUBA clearly identified the services rendered to Mr. Martinez as outpatient services. 3 Ms. … Louisiana Administrative Code Title 40, Part I, § 2507 makes no distinction concerning the type of medical services that qualify for the ninety percent reimbursement, only that the workers’ compensation employee is an

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Xxi Oil & Gas, LLC v. Hilcorp Energy Company

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 9, 2013

    “The statute clearly connects the costs reported to the benefits received in exchange. … Regardless of whether Hilcorp‟s statement substantially supplied adequate information, the statute makes clear, without any additional qualifying or modifying language, that the statement must be sworn.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.