Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterslactapp

8,141 results

1.41s

  • Alphonso v. Bridge Terminal Transport

    2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 2768 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 2003

    Where two permissible views of the evidence exist, a fact finder’s choice between them can never be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong. Id. … Under the Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 § 391.41(b)(7), a person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person “has no established medical history or clinical diagnosis of rheumatic, arthritic

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Ourso

    438 So. 2d 1239 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 12, 1983

    Schell was qualified, based on his training and experience, as an expert in the fields for which he was tendered. … We hold that the verdict of guilty of attempted distribution of a substance falsely represented to be a C.D.S. is clearly supported by the evidence.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

    170 So. 2d 874 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1965

    Clearly this was a dangerous and hazardous condition which could have been remedied easily by installing a floor and walls or hand rails between the cars. … Apparently defendant’s objection is that Reuther was not qualified as an expert on “work trains”. It is not shown wherein that fact would make a difference.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Guillory v. Soloco, Inc.

    570 So. 2d 139 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1990

    An odd lot claimant need not be absolutely helpless to qualify for total disability. … Considering all the evidence, particularly the relative qualifications of the lay and expert witnesses, we find that plaintiff established a prima facie case under the odd lot doctrine.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Smith

    97 La.App. 4 Cir. 1546 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1999

    It is in this regard that this case is clearly distinguishable from Miller. Mr. … Thus there was ample evidence to establish that Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Raymond A. Crawford and Alice Crawford v. William Karl Ordoyne, Jr., M.D. and Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, through the State of Louisiana, LSU Health Care Service Division

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2025

    LeBlanc opined that " the imaging studies, particularly the CT scans referenced above, clearly show that all tacks used by Dr. … Bonner' s affidavit clearly states that his opinions were formulated after reviewing the medical records presented to him, which include the CT reports at issue, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McGurk v. City of Shreveport

    191 So. 553 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1939

    “Plaintiff does not know when, by whom, or under whose authority, nor upon whose property, the sidewalk was laid; and, further, defendant Compere and the officials of the City of Shreveport are or should be better qualified … These authorities are clearly inapplicable.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Mitchell

    163 So. 3d 858 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 2015

    When the direct evidence is thus viewed, the facts established by the direct evidence and inferred from the circumstances established by that evidence must be sufficient for a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable … Our review of the trial evidence shows that these elements were clearly proven.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Burnett v. Lewis

    2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 0020 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 2003

    that the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous). … The trial court erred in giving credence to the testimony of experts who otherwise would not have qualified under the criteria established in the principles of Daubert v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State, in Interest of Dj

    2006 La.App. 4 Cir. 1491 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 16, 2007

    the factfinder is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous". … In order to protect his right to confidentiality and privacy, he will be identified solely by his initials. [2] Qualified Mental Retardation Professional. [3] Dr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Barnes

    597 So. 2d 1109 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 1992

    Honeyman, 565 So.2d 961, 966 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990): Before any witness can testify as an expert, his or her competence must be established to the satisfaction of the court. State v. … A person may qualify as an expert based on experience alone. State v. Smith, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daniel v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.

    2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 2427 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2003

    Daniel, failed to establish the existence of a work related disability. … Robert Segura, who was qualified at trial as a specialist in industrial medicine. Beginning on January 30, 1986 (the day after Mr.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Pearson

    939 So. 2d 568 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 2006

    Though we find no manifest error in the trial court's conclusion that Pearson intended to be domiciled at the Parkwood Street residence, we hold that the trial court clearly erred in concluding that Pearson actually resided … CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, we hereby reverse the trial court's decision and hold that Ricky Don Pearson is not qualified to seek the Office of Chief of Police of the Town of Arcadia.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.

    250 So. 2d 224 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1971

    The three remaining children are not properly represented in this action since no one has qualified to represent them.” Mr. … The record clearly discloses that the exception was not filed until after the answer had been filed. Under the holding in Davis v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Miller

    940 So. 2d 864 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 2006

    The medical evidence adduced at trial clearly demonstrated that the victim died due to non-accidental trauma to her brain. Dr. … records librarian of the hospital in question" would be the ones who could certify any records so as to qualify them for admission in evidence.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Burrow

    505 So. 2d 880 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1987

    and (2) Did the trial court err in excluding the hearsay testimony of an unidentified bystander as it qualifies as a "present sense impression" and an "excited utterance?" … The disadvantaged class includes those legal heirs not within the degree of relationship established by the statute.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bonvillian v. State Ex Rel. Department of Insurance

    2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 0591 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2008

    The district court abused its discretion and was clearly wrong by granting summary judgment on a declaratory judgment action when it was biased by the findings of an ALJ that were contrary to the law. 3. … Bonvillian’s Louisiana resident property and casualty producer’s license so that he may continue to operate as a bail bond agent in this state until such time as he fails to qualify under the terms of the Insurance Code.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Minor Children v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 2024

    The trial court erred in ordering the “harsh, drastic remedy” of preliminary injunctive relief because the Plaintiff failed to establish a clear violation of either La. … First, it is plain to us that, based on our previous discussion, the Archdiocese qualifies as a place of public accommodation by virtue of the state funding it receives. Next, La.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ragas v. Dewey

    663 So. 2d 827 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1995

    Hunter, 495 So.2d 1298 (La.1986) that a periodontist was qualified to testify relative to the standards of a general dentist. … The plaintiff must first establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the doctor’s treatment fell below the ordinary standard of care expected of physicians in his medical specialty, and must then establish a causal

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. City of Baton Rouge

    844 So. 2d 360 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 2003

    Clearly, the court erred in relying on this information, which was outside the record. … However, the constitutionality of this statute was called into question as an abrogation of sovereign immunity contained in Article XII, § 10(A) of the Louisiana Constitution.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.